collapse
GET THE MOST OUT OF YOUR GPS MAP Bearpaw Outfitters, Quality Hunts for over 30 Years

Author Topic: moose 10 pts or less?  (Read 7945 times)

Offline Bullkllr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2932
  • Location: Graham
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #50 on: May 14, 2017, 01:24:08 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?

"yoogle that on your google"

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 648
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #51 on: May 14, 2017, 01:42:18 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
I'm thinking if you don't ultimately draw a tag they count you as unsuccessful in the summary yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16499
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #52 on: May 14, 2017, 02:13:31 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2581
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #53 on: May 14, 2017, 03:47:42 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.

Offline Bullkllr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2932
  • Location: Graham
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #54 on: May 14, 2017, 04:12:31 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.

That makes sense  :tup:

So in many categories (less for OILs), a lot with the top points seem to be doing points only. Someone has 29 points for antlerless elk, and bought another point. In fact, only 1 of the 33 with 20 or more points didn't do points only for antlerless elk (and didn't draw Pine Mtn. Ranch fwiw). Plausible; still seems a bit weird.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2017, 04:31:50 PM by Bullkllr »
"yoogle that on your google"

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16499
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #55 on: May 14, 2017, 04:25:25 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.

That makes sense  :tup:

So in many categories (less for OILs), a lot with the top points seem to be doing "points only" then.
That is most likely the case. In addition, some applicants with maximum points have a bias. They are applying for the most difficult to draw hunts, and possibly only applying for one hunt choice versus multiple hunts.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 648
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #56 on: May 14, 2017, 06:18:16 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16499
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #57 on: May 14, 2017, 06:21:31 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 648
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #58 on: May 14, 2017, 07:07:28 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.

I would venture to guess that the 3 extra names in the hat is far outweighed by the 1000's of people who are gaining an extra 10 or 20 names in the hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16499
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #59 on: May 14, 2017, 07:14:04 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.

I would venture to guess that the 3 extra names in the hat is far outweighed by the 1000's of people who are gaining an extra 10 or 20 names in the hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
On average, the total number of "names in the hat" for quality hunts increases by about 15% per year. Someone with one point gets 300% more points going from year one to year two, and thus gains ground. Someone with 20 points gets only 10% more points going from year 20 to year 21 (400 to 441), and thus loses ground.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Miles

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3214
  • Location: Colorado
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #60 on: May 19, 2017, 08:46:47 AM »
I wouldn't waste my time applying for WA moose.  There are better options, that include hunting moose before you die of old age.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 10718
  • Location: The valley
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #61 on: May 19, 2017, 09:54:01 AM »
 :chuckle:

Offline huntnnw

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 6789
  • Location: Spokane
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #62 on: May 22, 2017, 05:37:43 AM »
I wouldn't waste my time applying for WA moose.  There are better options, that include hunting moose before you die of old age.

 :yeah: pony up the money for ID.. You will be moose hunting in a few years

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 10718
  • Location: The valley
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #63 on: May 22, 2017, 05:40:21 AM »
Apply as you are not out much money if you do and you might end up being lucky

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3020
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #64 on: May 22, 2017, 06:01:01 AM »
Here are the 2016 stats. Some of the tags went to folks with 2 or 3 points.
It's a Lottery.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2016category_points_anymoose.pdf

Offline jkononen

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 378
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley, Wa
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #65 on: May 25, 2017, 02:01:22 PM »
Here are the 2016 stats. Some of the tags went to folks with 2 or 3 points.
It's a Lottery.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2016category_points_anymoose.pdf
The 2 and 3 point winners for 49 degrees north we're a 10 year old and a 11 or 12 year old. Both from Skagit valley.
we live for the nights we never remember with the people we'll never forget

Offline smithjacksonsublette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 9
  • Location: lake stevens
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #66 on: June 28, 2017, 08:14:58 PM »
My 11 year old drew 124 with 3 points. From north Snoho. Not sure what youth odds are but that seems pretty good to me.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4273
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #67 on: July 10, 2017, 06:38:36 PM »
I drew 49 any moose in 2008 w 10 points.

Offline sure shot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 2
  • Location: Longview
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #68 on: September 17, 2017, 07:18:16 PM »
I drew an any moose in 49 deg, north this Oct. with 9 points.

Offline Buckblaster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: NE WA
  • 2015 Wyoming Moose
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #69 on: September 19, 2017, 12:45:37 PM »
Wow, I'm one of the 4 max-point holders, but it still doesn't guarantee me a tag.  Thinking that I may never draw a moose tag in this state, I put in for Wyoming moose points for 15 years before I finally had enough preference points to draw there.  In 2015, I cashed in my points and shot a 38" bull, which wasn't huge, but I took home 300 lbs of boned out meat, and I couldn't be happier. 
NRA Life Member

"The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late."
Thomas Jefferson

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 33725
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #70 on: September 19, 2017, 01:26:09 PM »
Max points right now is 22, and the data posted was from the previous year, so it looks like there are 310 people with "max points."

Offline Buckblaster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: NE WA
  • 2015 Wyoming Moose
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #71 on: September 19, 2017, 01:41:51 PM »
Sorry, I assumed I had max since I haven't missed a moose application since the early 1990's, but I looked up my points, and I in fact have only 22 points.  I am still not encouraged that I'll draw a tag any time soon. 
NRA Life Member

"The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late."
Thomas Jefferson

Offline Falcon

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 827
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #72 on: September 19, 2017, 03:05:17 PM »
Max points right now is 22, and the data posted was from the previous year, so it looks like there are 310 people with "max points."

Bcat..................You're a shoe in next year for a moose tag :drool:
Cast all your anxiety upon him, for he cares for you.    1 Peter 5:7

Offline Buckblaster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: NE WA
  • 2015 Wyoming Moose
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #73 on: September 19, 2017, 03:11:26 PM »
If the top points were actually preference points, the odds for getting one of the 103 any moose tags would be about 1 in 3.  The bonus point system is worthless.
NRA Life Member

"The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late."
Thomas Jefferson

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16499
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #74 on: September 19, 2017, 03:31:28 PM »
Max points right now is 22, and the data posted was from the previous year, so it looks like there are 310 people with "max points."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 

* Recent Topics

Freshest Whitetail Deer Scent by Fishoutdoors2016
[Today at 04:40:03 AM]


Hirshey's Washington Hunts 2017 by tgomez
[Yesterday at 11:52:08 PM]


Braque Francais by jagermiester
[Yesterday at 11:42:54 PM]


Blacktail Rut? by Eric M
[Yesterday at 11:32:00 PM]


Wheel/tire change question by thinkingman
[Yesterday at 11:22:56 PM]


Son had his first miss today... by lokidog
[Yesterday at 11:10:50 PM]


Factory 6.5 creedmore for big game by GurrCentral
[Yesterday at 11:06:48 PM]


Got an OIL permit long before I'm due..... by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 11:06:03 PM]


First bear ever - BIG boar down! by lokidog
[Yesterday at 11:00:34 PM]


2017 Elk, post them here (photos & stats) by csaaphill
[Yesterday at 10:52:36 PM]


Jayda Harmon's elk by branches
[Yesterday at 10:50:34 PM]


2017 Deer, post them here (photos & stats) by csaaphill
[Yesterday at 10:49:53 PM]


Well, this is gonna be different..... by lokidog
[Yesterday at 10:45:38 PM]


Bear walked right into camp! by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 10:44:04 PM]


As They Lay 2017 by lokidog
[Yesterday at 10:42:28 PM]


Who's going to be killing branched bulls in the Peaches area on Monday? by Biggerhammer
[Yesterday at 10:38:25 PM]


WY Solo DIY Public Land Antelope Success by finnman
[Yesterday at 10:37:04 PM]


Predator-proof pens ‘last-ditch effort’ to save Selkirk caribou by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 10:36:47 PM]


ISO Tree Faller Maple Valley by liljozie495
[Yesterday at 10:33:06 PM]


Elk novice needing strategy help. by cohochemist
[Yesterday at 10:31:01 PM]