collapse

Author Topic: 340 or 400 Spine?  (Read 497 times)

Offline Lingcod

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 186
  • Friends don't let friends eat farmed Salmon
340 or 400 Spine?
« on: August 18, 2017, 11:08:11 PM »
According to the GT chart I'm right in between 340 and 400 spine. I shoot 400 spine now and they seem ok. My max shooting range is 40 yds due to eye sight. My arrows are 26.5", draw weight @ 70# and using 125gr broadheads. At my short ranges will it make much of a difference to go with 340? Any thoughts would be great before I drop $70-90 on a half dozen arrows. 
“Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other.”

Offline luckyman

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 286
  • Location: mount vernon
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2017, 05:05:46 AM »
Sounds like you're pushing a 400 about as far as you can but if it groups broadhead then what the hey.
I shoot 27" 340 at 65# 100 grain heads and there about perfect.
I'm not sure.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 11852
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2017, 06:47:59 AM »
I shot for many years with 27" goldtips at 67 pounds but back then I was shooting light broadheads.  I switch this year to a 350 black eagle carnivore and have them loaded up with 42 grain brass inserts and a 125 grain rival from radical archery design.  My foc comes out at 16.6 %.

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2714
  • Location: NW Washington
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2017, 08:48:14 AM »
Ling, I would probably be shooting 340s with your setup.  Whenever you're on the line between XXX and XXX spine, its always better to opt for the heavier.  Heavier, stiffer arrows result in more KE and well, they're just plain tougher when blasting into a rib (or two).  Just my thoughts. 
Darton Archery Maverick II
"Sir, left side Sir!" "Are you sure Private Pyle?"
Elknut Field Staff

Offline Lingcod

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 186
  • Friends don't let friends eat farmed Salmon
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2017, 09:00:17 AM »
340 it is, Thanks guys! I'll grab a dozen today and see how they work.
“Always do what is right. It will gratify half of mankind and astound the other.”

Online Seahawk12

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 2790
  • Location: Kirkland
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2017, 09:05:29 AM »
Ling, I would probably be shooting 340s with your setup.  Whenever you're on the line between XXX and XXX spine, its always better to opt for the heavier.  Heavier, stiffer arrows result in more KE and well, they're just plain tougher when blasting into a rib (or two).  Just my thoughts.
:yeah:
I would go with the 340s.
You won't notice much difference. However, with early season so close I would be very hesitant to make any changes to my set-up.
But, if you are right on the border line between the two I would always go with the size up option.
One look at the photos of a shattered arrow through someones forward hand is all the convincing I'll ever need.
 :chuckle:
« Last Edit: August 19, 2017, 09:32:21 AM by Seahawk12 »
"I make up my opinions from facts and reasoning, and not to suit any body but myself. If people don't like my opinions, it makes little difference as I don't solicit their opinions or votes."
William Tecumseh Sherman

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 11852
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2017, 09:24:44 AM »
You agree with the above than say stick with the 400's :dunno:

Online Seahawk12

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 2790
  • Location: Kirkland
Re: 340 or 400 Spine?
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2017, 09:30:49 AM »
You agree with the above than say stick with the 400's :dunno:
Lol. The dangers of typing and talking to a kid.
Good thing I wasn't chewing gum too.  :chuckle:
Looks like Lingcod made his decision anyway.
"I make up my opinions from facts and reasoning, and not to suit any body but myself. If people don't like my opinions, it makes little difference as I don't solicit their opinions or votes."
William Tecumseh Sherman

 

* Recent Topics

First bear ever - BIG boar down! by robodad
[Today at 10:57:36 PM]


Golden Retriever Puppies by lokidog
[Today at 10:55:39 PM]


Multiple AR uppers 5.56, 6x45 and 270 AR by jpharcher
[Today at 10:49:10 PM]


PUPPIES! Our Golden Retriever Amber by lokidog
[Today at 10:45:20 PM]


Dayton-Marengo by Maverick
[Today at 10:34:38 PM]


Multi season permits, good or bad? by PolarBear
[Today at 10:11:57 PM]


2017 Deer, post them here (photos & stats) by chuckster
[Today at 10:11:16 PM]


BIG BUCK UP!!! by PastorJoel
[Today at 10:08:16 PM]


Wife's opening day Mulie by Calvin Rayborn
[Today at 09:58:23 PM]


Popular place by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 09:54:57 PM]


Jolly mtn fire, Teanaway GMU 335 by slowhand
[Today at 09:50:33 PM]


Well, this is gonna be different..... by fishnfur
[Today at 09:47:19 PM]


FS:Beeman SK X2 Dual Caliber Air Rifle(NEW) by Tiger1358
[Today at 09:47:16 PM]


Who you look'un at? by Elkcollector82
[Today at 09:38:48 PM]


wtb knight bighorn 50 cal. rifle by Lefty315
[Today at 09:21:45 PM]


Help with youth hunt preferably in Skok Unit. by pd
[Today at 09:13:18 PM]


Pictures in personal message? by RB
[Today at 09:06:47 PM]


jennabug's first deer story by ELKBURGER
[Today at 09:02:05 PM]


1999 22ft. Dutchman travel trailer by Salmonmoocher12
[Today at 08:57:51 PM]


2017 Bears by csaaphill
[Today at 08:51:56 PM]