collapse
Free Domestic Economy Shipping

Author Topic: High buck legality question  (Read 3853 times)

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
High buck legality question
« on: August 25, 2017, 01:21:54 PM »
I know this will look like a silly unlikely senerio, but I sometimes hunt places this could be a very realistic encounter.........

So if a person is just out of the wilderness area and a buck is in the legal wilderness area would it be legal to take the shot? I have looked through the regs and didn't see anything that addressed this. And no offense to anybody, I'm not looking for guess's or opinions. Just facts on if that would be legal or not.

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17506
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2017, 01:27:01 PM »
You could be considered hunting in an area that is not open to hunting, so it would not be legal.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2017, 01:38:09 PM »
You could be considered hunting in an area that is not open to hunting, so it would not be legal.
If I'm looking for game in a legal area and shoot an animal in a legal area I think there could be an argument to be made? I was hoping someone knew of something in the laws clearly spelled this out. And just to be clear wouldn't do this unless I knew it was legal. A buddy and I were talking about this today is why I brought it up.

Offline GUscottie

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 752
  • Location: Graham, Wa
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2017, 02:09:13 PM »
Here's my  :twocents: on this....

Where were you? in an area not legal to harvest an animal
Where was the animal? In a legal area...
If a cops sees this:He's going to cite you and charge you with hunting in an area you're not supposed to be in.

I personally wouldn't want to risk my $$ (for a lawyer and all the legal fees) and my hunting rights over a situation like this. If you get charged with a crime like this in WA, you lose your hunting in 42 or 44 states for x-years...Not even worth it in my opinion
Wishing I was fishing...or in Wyoming

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17506
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2017, 02:11:59 PM »
It doesn't necessarily even require someone to shoot from a closed area to be considered hunting.

(62) "To hunt" and its derivatives means an effort to kill, injure, harass, harvest, or capture a wild animal or wild bird.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.08.010
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2017, 02:17:38 PM »
Here's my  :twocents: on this....

Where were you? in an area not legal to harvest an animal
Where was the animal? In a legal area...
If a cops sees this:He's going to cite you and charge you with hunting in an area you're not supposed to be in.

I personally wouldn't want to risk my $$ (for a lawyer and all the legal fees) and my hunting rights over a situation like this. If you get charged with a crime like this in WA, you lose your hunting in 42 or 44 states for x-years...Not even worth it in my opinion

I agree with you.  Just wondering if there is anything in the law that addresses this senerio. Do both animal and hunter need to physically in the area? Or just the animal being harvested need to in open area? I  would surely think hunter in open area shooting animal in closed would be a sure no no.

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4917
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2017, 02:19:31 PM »
Because the location of the hunter is what determines whether it is legal or not in that case, a deer in a closed area would not be legal.

The deer is not the one doing the "hunting."
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2017, 02:29:28 PM »
It doesn't necessarily even require someone to shoot from a closed area to be considered hunting.

(62) "To hunt" and its derivatives means an effort to kill, injure, harass, harvest, or capture a wild animal or wild bird.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.08.010

Seeing that I would have agree it would not be legal probably or something a person would most likely be sited for. The only argument that could be made is a person was not trying to kill, injure, harass, ext. In a closed area if the animal targeted was known to be in an open area.

Just figured this must have been addressed at some point with the amount of miles of wilderness borders there are in this state. And even the cases one gmu is open and the bordering one is closed in other seasons.

Edit: to add to that a person could spot a deer in a legal area while not being in that area. And put a stock on it making sure he was physically in the legal area when he pulled the trigger. But by the letter of the law you sited he began "hunting" in a closed area because that is where the effort to kill originated?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2017, 02:41:59 PM by cboom »

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2017, 02:33:40 PM »
Because the location of the hunter is what determines whether it is legal or not in that case, a deer in a closed area would not be legal.

The deer is not the one doing the "hunting."

You kind of lost me there, or didn't read it right? Fully would think if the deer is in a closed area it would be illegal.

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17506
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2017, 02:34:29 PM »
I once was in a situation where elk were in an area closed to hunting, across the road from an open area. I asked an enforcement officer if someone could legally push the elk from the closed area into the open area. He said it could be considered hunting to push them across the road, even without having a firearm.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2017, 02:55:21 PM »
I once was in a situation where elk were in an area closed to hunting, across the road from an open area. I asked an enforcement officer if someone could legally push the elk from the closed area into the open area. He said it could be considered hunting to push them across the road, even without having a firearm.

I could sure see how they could use the harass part of the law there. Interesting reading the law you posted and reading your last post.  A person could be considered hunting with no weapon and no intent killing an animal.

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 4229
  • Location: Black Diamond
    • Backcountryhunting.net
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2017, 03:16:25 PM »
Grey area for sure, a guy could say that he was hunting bear in the area that was closed to the high buck.  I bet its up to the investigating officer if shooting across a wilderness boundary from one GMU into another would be enough to consider it a violation.  the deer that died would have been in an open area for the hunt so it could be legal who knows.....

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4917
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2017, 03:24:55 PM »
Because the location of the hunter is what determines whether it is legal or not in that case, a deer in a closed area would not be legal.

The deer is not the one doing the "hunting."

You kind of lost me there, or didn't read it right? Fully would think if the deer is in a closed area it would be illegal.

Don't think that you read it right, see the bolded parts, we are both saying the same thing there, just using different words.
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 10621
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2017, 03:29:08 PM »
I personally would shoot it, but maybe it would be the same thing as shooting from the side of the road?
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2017, 03:39:29 PM »
Because the location of the hunter is what determines whether it is legal or not in that case, a deer in a closed area would not be legal.

The deer is not the one doing the "hunting."

You kind of lost me there, or didn't read it right? Fully would think if the deer is in a closed area it would be illegal.

Don't think that you read it right, see the bolded parts, we are both saying the same thing there, just using different words.

I'm a bit slow!

 

* Recent Topics

The old Warrior by danderson
[Today at 08:10:25 AM]


2016 Booner Mule Deer Mount by Sandberm
[Today at 08:00:49 AM]


Observatory quality Elk Success by mtndew
[Today at 07:59:50 AM]


WTS bushmaster ar15 with vortex strike eagle 1x6x24 +acc.(PRICE DROP) by LongBomb
[Today at 07:57:36 AM]


My Bethel Quality Bull tag hunt...... by Rainier10
[Today at 07:44:09 AM]


tearing down dams by Born2late
[Today at 07:01:25 AM]


White river archery quality elk 653 by bkaech
[Today at 06:52:38 AM]


Found 6x7 bull looking for shooter!!!! by 2MANY
[Today at 06:42:11 AM]


2018 Coho MA 8-10 by h20hunter
[Today at 06:24:00 AM]


Crispi Boots Leaking by NorseNW
[Today at 06:14:46 AM]


high dollar cast iron by Blacklab
[Today at 06:06:52 AM]


New member - Introduction by debord35
[Today at 06:01:48 AM]


2007 Yamaha TW200 by lewy
[Today at 05:51:21 AM]


Elk at Dosewallips State Park by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:39:53 AM]


FS-Davis/Happys air dryers price drop to $30 each by MADMAX
[Today at 05:07:14 AM]


FS- semi auto- Remington 7400 in .270 win, ***** last price drop to $300 by MADMAX
[Today at 05:06:17 AM]


2018 County Challenge! and still...one more and done! by bearpaw
[Today at 01:47:25 AM]


$30 worth of raffle tickets..... by bearpaw
[Today at 01:23:01 AM]


Mt. View Unit by Shawn Ryan
[Yesterday at 11:41:39 PM]


Accuracy sucks, Advice needed by Biggerhammer
[Yesterday at 11:32:27 PM]