collapse
Free Domestic Economy Shipping Be a more successful hunter!

Author Topic: High buck legality question  (Read 3407 times)

Online Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4662
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2017, 03:48:56 PM »
I personally would shoot it, but maybe it would be the same thing as shooting from the side of the road?

Not really, because if done right, shooting from the side of the road is legal.

Think more along the line of standing in an open unit and shooting a deer in a clearing that happens to be in a park.

One area is open the other is not.  The deer is killed in a closed area, so it was not legally taken.
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Online Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4662
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2017, 03:57:47 PM »
My examples are based on the OP's assertion that he knows the area the deer is standing is open and he is in a closed area.

Since the burden lays on the hunter to know his location and boundaries/property lines, GMU restrictions or requirements, etc. I can't see a situation where if discovered, he could put up a good arguement for not being cited.

Possibly could argue no intent to violate the law to the Judge if he didn't know that where he was standing was closed , but I don't think if it went that far, the hunter would walk away without some degree of a penalty.


Corrected my mistake...thanks for seeing it, cause I sure couldn't!!   :DOH:
« Last Edit: August 25, 2017, 04:32:46 PM by Blacktail Sniper »
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Online Boss .300 winmag

  • Best Biggie Blogger
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9670
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • DAN-O CAN'T TAKE BIGGIE PICS
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2017, 04:25:37 PM »
My examples are based on the OP's assertion that he knows the area the deer is standing is closed.

Since the burden lays on the hunter to know his location and boundaries/property lines, GMU restrictions or requirements, etc. I can't see a situation where if discovered, he could put up a good arguement for not being cited.

Possibly could argue no intent to violate the law to the Judge if he didn't know that where the deer was standing was closed, but I don't think if it went that far, the hunter would walk away without some degree of a penalty.

Op said the deer was in the open area, shooter outside of open area.  ;)
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc On!

Offline 3nails

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 3500
    • Jeff Hinkle
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2017, 04:27:54 PM »
 This seems like a no brainer to me. If outside of the open area that would be hunting in a closed area regardless of where the buck is standing. Also not having hunter orange on would make it illegal also.
"The word of God is like a lion. You don't have to defend a lion. All you have to do is let the lion loose, and the lion will defend itself."
Charles Spurgeon

Instagram    3nails_hinkle

Offline huntnfmly

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1793
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2017, 04:28:45 PM »
Beat me to it boss.
Yes the op is in closed area deer is not
I'm your dam tour guide arty...
Take as many dam pictures as you want ....
Are there any dam questions ..

Online Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4662
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2017, 04:28:56 PM »
My examples are based on the OP's assertion that he knows the area the deer is standing is closed.

Since the burden lays on the hunter to know his location and boundaries/property lines, GMU restrictions or requirements, etc. I can't see a situation where if discovered, he could put up a good arguement for not being cited.

Possibly could argue no intent to violate the law to the Judge if he didn't know that where the deer was standing was closed, but I don't think if it went that far, the hunter would walk away without some degree of a penalty.

Op said the deer was in the open area, shooter outside of open area.  ;)

Thank you, I read that 3 times and knew something was not right...just couldn't see it!!!   :bash:


Will correct it! 

It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline teanawayslayer

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2081
  • Location: Eastside
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2017, 04:35:05 PM »
 You would be hunting from a closed a unit there for illegal illegal illegal!  But I guess if you have enough money you could get out of it pretty easily!  :hello:
Happiness is being in the woods!!!

Online Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4662
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2017, 04:38:26 PM »
Because the location of the hunter is what determines whether it is legal or not in that case, a deer in a closed area would not be legal.

The deer is not the one doing the "hunting."

You kind of lost me there, or didn't read it right? Fully would think if the deer is in a closed area it would be illegal.

Don't think that you read it right, see the bolded parts, we are both saying the same thing there, just using different words.

I'm a bit slow!


Don't feel bad, you aren't the only one!!!!
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline blacktailer

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1164
  • Location: Lynden
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #23 on: August 25, 2017, 08:06:01 PM »
Dang Cboom.  Looks like you'll actually have to hike your sorry butt up the mountain rather than relying on that new long range shooting stick...
"A lazy man works twice as hard"

Offline HardCorpsHuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 798
  • Location: Chelan County
  • Semper Fi
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #24 on: August 25, 2017, 09:58:00 PM »
Grey area, therefore default to NOT shooting. 

I have asked this specific question to tenured WDFW officers and received conflicting answers; which I have no problem with.  Officers, prosecutors, and judges all conflict within their own professions at times.  I'm not a risk taker when it comes to fish and wildlife laws (or any law), so when in question don't send it, and plan an alternative kill solution.





   
"Fast is fine. Accuracy is final. You need to learn to shoot slow, real fast." -Wyatt Earp

Offline deerhuntr4885

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 293
  • Location: Selah
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #25 on: August 25, 2017, 10:02:16 PM »
If you really want to know, contact F&G.  Don't ask for legal advice from forum. I know a lot of guys do, but man!  Do you really want to entrust your hunting privelages to a bunch of guys sitting in front of their computers with a beer In one hand and their.......uhhhh, mouse, in the other?     :chuckle:
Mike Henne

Offline robescc

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1044
  • Location: Crow, OR
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2017, 10:26:35 PM »
Why do a few of you guys think thus is a grey area? It's Black and White. You hunt and shho within the boundary. It would be the same as shooting across GMU  boundaries when the one you are in is closed to hunting.
I hunt therefore I am.

Offline cboom

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #27 on: August 26, 2017, 12:58:55 AM »
Why do a few of you guys think thus is a grey area? It's Black and White. You hunt and shho within the boundary. It would be the same as shooting across GMU  boundaries when the one you are in is closed to hunting.
Please show me the law that shows its black and white. I can't find  it? Like I said in my original post I'm not interested in opinions.  I am interested in the law.

Offline cboom

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #28 on: August 26, 2017, 01:03:04 AM »
You would be hunting from a closed a unit there for illegal illegal illegal!  But I guess if you have enough money you could get out of it pretty easily!  :hello:

You might not really understand what I'm talking about here. Like I said to begin with please post factual laws. Not interested in opinions.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2017, 07:40:54 AM by bobcat »

Offline cboom

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 749
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: High buck legality question
« Reply #29 on: August 26, 2017, 01:07:54 AM »
Dang Cboom.  Looks like you'll actually have to hike your sorry butt up the mountain rather than relying on that new long range shooting stick...

Those big shooting sticks you speak of are only good for a bit over a mile. Still a bit of work  involved!

 

* Recent Topics

Therm-a-Rest LuxuryLite UltraLite Cot - $120 by dscubame
[Today at 09:17:28 PM]


WY Antelope, early season? by lokidog
[Today at 09:09:58 PM]


Elk tag by dscubame
[Today at 09:07:31 PM]


Montana Antelope Region 7 by CastleRocker
[Today at 09:03:38 PM]


ISO Tikka T3 300 win mag. by SeaRun1
[Today at 09:02:05 PM]


Yellowstone trip, end of May by kselkhunter
[Today at 08:59:47 PM]


Eastside Mule Deer Survival Study Update by savagehunter
[Today at 08:59:18 PM]


Spokane Wild Game Feed this weekend by The Weazle
[Today at 08:55:49 PM]


Smith and Wesson m&p 9 shield $300 by John B
[Today at 08:54:43 PM]


Showstopper Prints are awesome by deerhuntr4885
[Today at 08:51:00 PM]


Fall season will be much longer bag limit 4 by scotrobe
[Today at 08:45:39 PM]


WTS:Remington 7mm Mag,Nikon,Eborlestock by Ridge Hunter
[Today at 08:28:35 PM]


It this okay? by Hawkins1375
[Today at 08:22:39 PM]


What happened to all the stocked trout??? by pd
[Today at 08:12:21 PM]


Quality Hunt Wait by jstone
[Today at 08:08:53 PM]


15000 Watts of Power by gasman
[Today at 07:47:26 PM]


Youth antlerless only moose. by Bob33
[Today at 07:42:35 PM]


FS Marmot Halo 4p Tent by Nwgunner
[Today at 07:39:34 PM]


Ticks by yorketransport
[Today at 07:30:42 PM]


NRA/CPRA Lawsuit against CA by Fl0und3rz
[Today at 06:58:39 PM]