collapse

Author Topic: Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners  (Read 767 times)

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 450
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners
« on: September 28, 2017, 10:24:06 AM »
Commissioners:
 
Below is a summary of key issues regarding the wolf management lawsuit filed on 9/25/17.  This information will be distributed to the wolf advisory group tomorrow.
 
Please let us know if you have any questions.
 
Sincerely,
 
Nate Pamplin, Policy Director
WDFW
(360) 902-2693
 
 
Wolf management lawsuit
Key issues – September 27, 2017

Summary of allegations[/b]

On September 25, two environmental groups, the Center for Biological Diversity of Tucson, AZ, and Cascadia Wildlands of Eugene, OR, filed a lawsuit in Thurston County Superior Court designed to force WDFW to stop killing gray wolves that repeatedly prey on livestock.

The suit challenges the use of the department’s current wolf-livestock interactions protocol (Protocol), developed by WDFW and its Wolf Advisory Group. The Protocol was developed to implement the provisions of the 2011 Wolf Conservation and Management Plan (Wolf Plan).

In their complaint, the plaintiffs contend that:

  • The department’s adoption of the protocol – and subsequent decisions to remove a wolf under the terms of the protocol – violated the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) because WDFW did not make “threshold determinations” of whether its action would have significant environmental impacts.
  • WDFW should have produced a supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) for the protocol, because the original EIS for the 2011 Wolf Plan contemplated additional environmental review.
  • The lethal removal order for the Sherman Pack was arbitrary and capricious because it was based on unsupported findings that continued predation was likely and that removal of wolves from the pack would not harm overall gray wolf recovery.

Background of protocol

The department will not comment on details of the complaint or pending litigation, except to say:
  • The protocol was developed in 2016 and refined in 2017 by WDFW staff and members of the department’s Wolf Advisory Group, which includes a diversity of Washington citizens representing perspectives from livestock producers, hunters, and environmentalists.
  • The protocol is not just a set of guidelines for lethal removal. In fact, it includes expectations for the use of proactive non-lethal, preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood of wolf-livestock conflict. It also spells out criteria, which are consistent with the Wolf Plan, for wolf removal in cases where wolves do not respond to non-lethal deterrence measures.
  • One purpose of the protocol is to describe when the department considers lethal removal of gray wolves, which is an action that was assessed in Chapter 4 of the 2011 Wolf Plan.

WDFW Perspective
  • Wolf conservation and management is highly controversial nationwide and unfortunately has a history of litigation. While we’re disappointed that these two out-of-state groups have chosen to file a lawsuit, the department is committed to continuing to work with a diversity of Washington citizens and stakeholders on the conservation and management of Washington’s growing wolf population.
Liberalism is the philosophy of Western suicide.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 27334
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, MH, WFW, CCRKBA, NAGR, RMEF, WSB
Re: Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2017, 11:02:18 AM »
Lay with dogs, get fleas.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline timberfaller

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 1583
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2017, 10:34:17 PM »
 "two environmental groups, the Center for Biological Diversity of Tucson, AZ, and Cascadia Wildlands of Eugene, OR,"

Surprise Surprise!!!  NOT!!  These people need to be in a mental institution somewhere.

CBD is your friendly Anti 2A group who soul existent if from "Grants"(aka Taxpayers dollars) They know that if they can get lead banned They win the fight!! :kneel:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 29482
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: WFW, WSTA, WSB, WPHA, FWM, NRA, SCI, RMEF, NAHC, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB
Re: Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2017, 04:02:30 AM »
Absolutely no surprise, we will face lawsuits at every turn, it's how the wolfers operate!
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://trophymaps.com "Do-It-Yourself" Hunting Maps" 
http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided, Semi-Guided, Unguided, and Drop Camp Hunts in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Washington. Hunts with tags available (no draw) spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf!

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1462
Re: Wolf Lawsuit: WDFW Memo to Commissioners
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2017, 07:27:16 AM »
$$$$$, no effect

 

* Recent Topics

New Unofficial Regulations & Harvest Summary Tool by steeleywhopper
[Today at 12:33:11 AM]


Ruger DZM77 .270 price drop to $500 firm $400 without scope by spin05
[Today at 12:26:56 AM]


Maybe moving to Idaho by b23
[Yesterday at 11:55:34 PM]


First game camera advice please by smithkl42
[Yesterday at 11:42:50 PM]


High Buck Hunt by fillthefreezer
[Yesterday at 11:04:39 PM]


June-ish 2018. Not bad by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 11:02:36 PM]


2018 Malibu 23 LSV by JWEBB
[Yesterday at 10:57:04 PM]


Illegal Activities Involving Wolves or Other Wildlife by Brad Harshman
[Yesterday at 10:50:50 PM]


Big bows by Ricon650
[Yesterday at 10:42:11 PM]


SELL rem 700 300 Rum with Leupold 8.5-25 by autodink13
[Yesterday at 10:38:36 PM]


Goose prairie/bumping by eastfork
[Yesterday at 10:23:17 PM]


Brewster Pool by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:23:16 PM]


Draws are complete...what does your fall look like? by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:19:35 PM]


Wolves tree DNR worker in Okanogan county by Jpmiller
[Yesterday at 10:16:45 PM]


2018 Area 9 and 10 Summer Kings by hhack
[Yesterday at 10:05:18 PM]


Who's going to get screwed this season? by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 10:00:02 PM]


Charcuterie by Angry Perch
[Yesterday at 09:56:55 PM]


Cutt on the take by HookedOnQuack
[Yesterday at 09:45:37 PM]


Nikon P1000, 125x magnification by firepin
[Yesterday at 09:09:39 PM]


How is the twisp Winthrop area fairing so far 2018? by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 09:09:22 PM]