collapse
Double U Hunting Supply A lightweight orange vest that complements your technical hunting apparel!

Author Topic: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer  (Read 8339 times)

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 11719
  • Location: The valley
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #120 on: February 06, 2018, 05:58:15 AM »
What is your suggestion we do?

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1442
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #121 on: February 06, 2018, 10:34:47 AM »
Its not up to me what YOU do. Not sure you were even asking me...I dunno Id say call your local biologist, attend public comment meetings and comment on the proposed game laws :dunno:
Or just complain online and not really do anything.

Offline fishwhackin

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 100
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #122 on: February 06, 2018, 10:39:32 AM »
There are a lot of good ideas in this thread and an obvious concern for the mule deer population.  It was mentioned before about the ups and downs and that couldn't be any more true and natural.  I personally think that we need to continue with the harvest as is.  We can give into the predators and "offer" our thoughts to WDFW and help maintain the same numbers we currently have or we can continue to harvest mule deer and get the numbers a little lower.  What happens when the numbers get a little lower?  Well, those wolves and cougar will have to find something else to eat and/or become ill and naturally pass on reducing their numbers where they are at a low (Lower wolf numbers would make several people happy).  When this happens, the mule deer numbers will bounce back for a few years until the predators become healthy again due to the bounty of food.  Of course we will experience good and bad years for hunting success but it will maintain itself until either WDFW takes the tags from us themselves which will do nothing if they do not have a plan already in place and being executed for the predators.  My point is:  Until WDFW implements appropriate predator management, we should never give away our permits or opportunities.  This will only increase the abundance for the predators that will thrive due to their current mismanagement and we will gain nothing.  Don't be fooled by thinking that the numbers will bounce back because of no hunting.  It will be self-defeating.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 26790
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #123 on: February 06, 2018, 10:48:47 AM »
There are a lot of good ideas in this thread and an obvious concern for the mule deer population.  It was mentioned before about the ups and downs and that couldn't be any more true and natural.  I personally think that we need to continue with the harvest as is.  We can give into the predators and "offer" our thoughts to WDFW and help maintain the same numbers we currently have or we can continue to harvest mule deer and get the numbers a little lower.  What happens when the numbers get a little lower?  Well, those wolves and cougar will have to find something else to eat and/or become ill and naturally pass on reducing their numbers where they are at a low (Lower wolf numbers would make several people happy).  When this happens, the mule deer numbers will bounce back for a few years until the predators become healthy again due to the bounty of food.  Of course we will experience good and bad years for hunting success but it will maintain itself until either WDFW takes the tags from us themselves which will do nothing if they do not have a plan already in place and being executed for the predators.  My point is:  Until WDFW implements appropriate predator management, we should never give away our permits or opportunities.  This will only increase the abundance for the predators that will thrive due to their current mismanagement and we will gain nothing.  Don't be fooled by thinking that the numbers will bounce back because of no hunting.  It will be self-defeating.

 You have not read the wolf plan.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5353
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #124 on: February 06, 2018, 10:55:25 AM »
One more time...

Quote
Management of predators to benefit prey populations will be considered when there is evidence
that predation is a significant factor inhibiting the ability of a prey population to attain
population management objectives. For example, when a prey population is below population
objective and other actions to increase prey numbers such as hunting reductions or other
actions to achieve ungulate population objectives have already been implemented, and
predation continues to be a limiting factor. In these cases, predator management actions would
be directed at individuals or populations depending on scientific evidence and would include
assessments of population levels, habitat factors, disease, etc.
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 11719
  • Location: The valley
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #125 on: February 06, 2018, 11:35:22 AM »
There in there lies the problem, when the evidence is presented a deaf ear is turned in that direction. Do you actually believe for one moment they are going to go against their pre set quotas? When you set your population objectives so low your rear is always covered.

Offline fishwhackin

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 100
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #126 on: February 09, 2018, 11:39:47 AM »
I am aware of the wolf management plan.  I shouldn't have tried to water down my thought.  Get over it and just keep hunting.  It is obvious that the wolves are here to stay and expand as the WDFW desires.  My point was, keep hunting deer and the population decreases which will decrease the wolf population as a follow on (which seems to be what the majority here wants).  Give up hunting opportunities and you create a buffet to allow the wolves to thrive.  Maybe it is more clear now that I put it that way?  We just have to accept there will be up and down years in regards to quality of hunts until WDFW changes their mind.  How do you change their mind is a whole other topic.  Research "common sense conservation/Missouri" and see how the hunters there persuaded the game department.  Until we stand together as a hunting community to protest (not just rant) the WDFW, it will not change.  A year or two with minimal tag and permit sales will get their attention very fast.

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1442
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #127 on: February 13, 2018, 06:01:28 AM »
Two more days dudes
https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/regulations/seasonsetting/2018-2020/index.php

Anyone been calling your local bios??

Offline Utah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 300
  • Location: Nez Perce County
Re: A Proposal for Washington's Mule Deer
« Reply #128 on: February 17, 2018, 11:00:02 AM »
Release the hounds!   Give enough doe tags per unit to increase buck to doe populations! :twocents:
Blackhawks

 

* Recent Topics

Rathdrum Idaho by jjaba
[Today at 09:12:52 AM]


Leftover multi-season tags by ghostshell
[Today at 09:06:34 AM]


Map of Previous Fires by Knocker of rocks
[Today at 09:03:59 AM]


Smoke by Dick in the Dirt
[Today at 09:02:53 AM]


For those that prefer Blondes by bearmanric
[Today at 08:47:54 AM]


Brooks Range Caribou Hunt by Machias
[Today at 08:08:21 AM]


WTS Tactical Solutions barrel 8.5" for Ruger 1-3 + 22/45 by crazywednesday
[Today at 07:59:29 AM]


WTS Sig P229 .40... price drop by crazywednesday
[Today at 07:58:25 AM]


WTS Keltec P3AT 380 auto Pocket Pistol... price drop by crazywednesday
[Today at 07:57:25 AM]


WTS CZ 75 SP01 9mm decocker model by crazywednesday
[Today at 07:56:29 AM]


Timberlands on SW closed by deerhunter_98520
[Today at 07:49:54 AM]


WTB wttf Savage 99 .300 savage by WoodencrossIII
[Today at 07:49:34 AM]


Bear, deer, people... no elk by John B
[Today at 07:35:30 AM]


Ltt/lts browning bar 270 win by WoodencrossIII
[Today at 07:33:54 AM]


Boyz In The Hood by PlateauNDN
[Today at 06:59:32 AM]


Olympic 621 elk tag by fishngamereaper
[Today at 06:05:13 AM]


Hmmm .375 or .416 Ruger? by Dan-o
[Today at 12:35:34 AM]


New 264 Win Mag by Dan-o
[Today at 12:19:07 AM]


Big Win for the NRA!!! by SCRUBS
[Yesterday at 11:19:17 PM]


Scotch Creek Wildlife Area Charles and Mary Eder Unit by MtnMuley
[Yesterday at 10:57:48 PM]