collapse

Author Topic: Unsworth Resigns  (Read 4842 times)

Offline Buzz2401

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 962
  • Location: Tacoma
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #75 on: January 25, 2018, 05:15:59 PM »
I don't see this as a good thing.  We just lost someone who for the most part wanted what we wanted but didn't have the power to get it.  Now we will most likely end up with someone who will most likely be more liberal and less recreational friendly.  I wouldn't be surprised to see a Tribal member get the position so that they can "work together more closely with tribes".

Offline aaronoto

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 357
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #76 on: January 25, 2018, 06:36:07 PM »
I don't see this as a good thing.  We just lost someone who for the most part wanted what we wanted but didn't have the power to get it.  Now we will most likely end up with someone who will most likely be more liberal and less recreational friendly.  I wouldn't be surprised to see a Tribal member get the position so that they can "work together more closely with tribes".

Better the devil you know then the devil you don't know.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16859
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #77 on: January 25, 2018, 07:00:14 PM »
I hope I am wrong, but with a Democratic led Senate and House and a Democratic Governor running for the White House the new Director could be worse for hunters.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 28440
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: WFW, WSTA, WSB, WPHA, FWM, NRA, SCI, RMEF, NAHC, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #78 on: January 25, 2018, 07:02:32 PM »
I hope I am wrong, but with a Democratic led Senate and House and a Democratic Governor running for the White House the new Director could be worse for hunters.

I am thinking exactly the same thing. The next could be worse than the last two!
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://trophymaps.com "Do-It-Yourself" Hunting Maps" 
http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided, Semi-Guided, Unguided, and Drop Camp Hunts in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Washington. Hunts with tags available (no draw) spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf!

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4176
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #79 on: January 25, 2018, 08:52:42 PM »
Iíve heard that the biologists tried to up the quotas on lions a couple of years ago and it got nixed by the governor.  :dunno:

Unlikely what you heard is what happened
http://www.king5.com/article/tech/science/environment/cougar-hunters-kill-more-than-double-recommended-guidelines/281-391510894

That story is misleading. The biologists recommend a harvest of 10% to 16%. If you take WDFWs cougar population estimates to be accurate, WA last year harvested 13.85% of the cougar population. Clearly within their recommendations. I'll add this is way up from previous years so even that high of a harvest is not a trend.
Additionally only 34% of cougar management areas exceed their target harvest. 55% of cougar management areas never reached their target. 11% were within the target numbers range. Assuming cougars do travel, the areas that went over target should fill in rather quickly.
So do we kill more then biologists recommend? In select areas the answer could be yes but over a one year period hardly anything anyone should worry about.
All that s assuming there are only 2000 cougar in the State. :rolleyes: 
Bruce Vandervort

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 28440
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: WFW, WSTA, WSB, WPHA, FWM, NRA, SCI, RMEF, NAHC, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #80 on: January 26, 2018, 03:47:21 AM »
Iíve heard that the biologists tried to up the quotas on lions a couple of years ago and it got nixed by the governor.  :dunno:

Unlikely what you heard is what happened
http://www.king5.com/article/tech/science/environment/cougar-hunters-kill-more-than-double-recommended-guidelines/281-391510894

That story is misleading. The biologists recommend a harvest of 10% to 16%. If you take WDFWs cougar population estimates to be accurate, WA last year harvested 13.85% of the cougar population. Clearly within their recommendations. I'll add this is way up from previous years so even that high of a harvest is not a trend.
Additionally only 34% of cougar management areas exceed their target harvest. 55% of cougar management areas never reached their target. 11% were within the target numbers range. Assuming cougars do travel, the areas that went over target should fill in rather quickly.
So do we kill more then biologists recommend? In select areas the answer could be yes but over a one year period hardly anything anyone should worry about.
All that s assuming there are only 2000 cougar in the State. :rolleyes:

I've heard some WDFW people say they think there may be 3000 to 4000 cougar, the truth is that they really don't have a very good feel for what there is, if in fact we have twice as many cougar as the 2000 guestimate, which I believe there are, then we only harvested 6.925% of the cougar population!  :dunno:

If you read the cougar study from Alberta they mention cases where higher percentages were harvested and the population rebounded within 2 years, they also mention up to 40% of cougar being harvested in another area, I think it was Utah, and yet the population eventually rebounded.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://trophymaps.com "Do-It-Yourself" Hunting Maps" 
http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided, Semi-Guided, Unguided, and Drop Camp Hunts in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Washington. Hunts with tags available (no draw) spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf!

Offline idahohuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2357
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #81 on: January 26, 2018, 08:52:52 AM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Southpole

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 2349
  • Location: Arlington/Oso
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #82 on: January 26, 2018, 09:11:05 AM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?
Survival of the cutest. If cougars were god awful, ugly, smelly, slimy creatures no one would care. But seriously, with no dogs, boot hunters obviously can't possibly keep up with thinning them out down to a reasonable number for reasons you've mentioned. Then throw in crazy low quotas and they may as well just close cougar hunting all together.
$5 is a lot of money if you ain't got it

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13973
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #83 on: January 26, 2018, 09:19:57 AM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?

Perhaps they need to educate us, because I can't understand it either.  With our restricted harvest options we cannot possibly put a dent in the population.  We could have 24/7 365 same rules as coyote and not hurt the cougar population.  Not only that but cougar are one of the fastest rebounding species out there for recovery.  There's been numerous studies where cougar were hunted purposefully down to low numbers to test their recovery and they found that they recover very quickly.  So even if somehow boot hunters did somehow manage to kill 1000's of cougars a year or two of restriction and they'd be back, but boot hunters aren't going to kill any big numbers of cats. 

Trapping is what we need if we want to cull back cougar numbers to increase deer herd numbers, although given a cats range and proclivity for keeping other cats out of their territory I think trapping would be hard presses to get any serious numbers of cats off the landscape.  A successful trapper could increase the deer herd in a small area though, that what I'm hoping for.   There's a chunk of state land I know of with difficult access that had a robust mule deer population, it was a small pocket of big mules, but now they're dwindled down to nothing due to cats.  I found 12 mule deer carcasses with the ribs ate out in a 1/4 square mile area shed hunting in the last bit of spring snow.  How many did I not find?  Ever since hounds were eliminated this small pocket of mules have been going down hill.   I only found 1 mule doe left this year, she was all by herself in mid September and a cat was stalking her, I almost walked on top of the cat then I busted the deer 50 yards downhill of the cat.  The cat hissed at me  :chuckle:   I expect this might be the last year for mule deer in there.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 9973
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #84 on: January 26, 2018, 09:31:37 AM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?
You can learn all about cougars here from this guy....I'm sure the hippies will.
http://www.pencol.edu/events/studium-generale-reciprocity-among-mountain-lions-0

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 17852
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #85 on: January 26, 2018, 10:09:58 AM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?
Great points, and it highlights the idiocy of the department and thier suggested rule changes.

How many west side units never reach thier quota?

How dumb is it of the WDFW to tighten restrictions across the state when only a few gmus ever reach or surpass the quotas? It makes them look disconnected and harms thier relationship with hunters... 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline James

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 163
  • Location: Washington
You will never shoot a camp bull by spending all your time hunting in the woods.

Offline Bill W

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1366
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • Groups: NRA, CBA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #87 on: January 26, 2018, 11:56:08 AM »
Ron's a common sense sport fisherman.  I agree Unsworth mucked up the Puget Sound salmon fishing.   What I don't like is his fishing "rules simplification" exercise that just ended and now messed up some of the Columbia Basin fishing opportunities.   He ran the exercise and then resigned from the job.  Shoot, why change the rules if you don't intend to stick around and see them implemented.   I've seen this before and it was called seagull management.  Fly by, drop a turd and then fly out and let others fix things.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 11300
  • Location: The valley
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #88 on: January 26, 2018, 12:13:59 PM »
But things can always be blamed on the guy or turd dropper that went out.

Offline WSU

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 3520
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #89 on: January 26, 2018, 12:41:54 PM »
Head over to bloodydecks and read Ron's version of events.  Sounds like Unsworth was a no-show at lots of important meetings.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4176
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #90 on: January 26, 2018, 01:18:57 PM »
I know nothing about cougar management or biology - but I can't understand why harvest is so restricted for a species that is so difficult to hunt given dogs are outlawed.  Of all the wildlife the state manages, cougars and coyotes are 2 species I probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time worrying about the hunters killing them all off. For those who are far more informed on cougars...is there really a risk of hunting them to dangerously low levels if season were open all year? Or at least from fall to spring? If hunters kill 1 or 2 or 5 over their quotas...what's the harm?
Great points, and it highlights the idiocy of the department and thier suggested rule changes.

How many west side units never reach thier quota?

How dumb is it of the WDFW to tighten restrictions across the state when only a few gmus ever reach or surpass the quotas? It makes them look disconnected and harms thier relationship with hunters... 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Last year the answer was 26.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2018, 05:15:32 PM by Humptulips »
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 6338
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #91 on: January 26, 2018, 01:53:42 PM »
Probably the worst job in the state other than Superintendent of Seattle Public Schools,  Director of Washington State DSHS, and manager of the Seattle Mariners.

Offline Netminder01

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 1012
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #92 on: January 26, 2018, 03:34:27 PM »
I'd like to see the person that takes office be passionate about finding new ways to grow access, opportunities, and increase the new hunter/angler enthusiast numbers. Someone who was passionate about providing a balanced conservation approach to with a mentality to help grow our sport and voice in this state.

IMO, WDFW should be run like a business or high performing team (sport, military, etc). Identify strong leadership, create a vision that's hard to achieve, trim the fat, provide unfettered transparency, modernize and listen to the people (us) who support the brand and sport. A shared goal that's hard to achieve will ignite a passion in the outdoor community in WA who could make meaningful change.

Without leadership we believe in and will follow, our state will continue to fall behind. A state like Washington should be among the leaders in the US promoting hunting/fishing opportunities, education, technology, and tourism instead of cutting and restricting opportunities on top of poor hunter-ed funding & resources. We're not.

If only I could make the rules... I'd implement a mechanism that every two years we, the hunters and anglers vote to renew the person in this role - or vote someone else in. Similar to the GM position on the Seattle Sounders. Not a general voting but those of us who buy licenses and contribute more directly to the sport than average voters.

Who knows, it might help identify the kind of leader who'd thrive in that role but also the right kind of interaction with everyone involved not to mention yield the results we all want in modern conservation, hunting & fishing along the way.

#NetForPrez  :tup:


Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16859
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #93 on: January 26, 2018, 03:45:18 PM »
WDFW is mandated to serve not just hunting interests, but also fishing and non-consumptive users.

Fishing is of far greater importance than hunting. Add in the interests of non-consumptive users, which are generally of one mind compared to the fragmented voices of hunters who often fight among themselves, and we end up too often at the bottom of the heap.

 
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4176
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #94 on: January 26, 2018, 05:18:37 PM »
Just to be clear I changed my post about the number of Westside Cougar management units that reach quota. Should have said 4 did, 26 didn't.
Sorry for all the thread hijacking but needed to correct my mistake.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline bigmacc

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 896
  • Location: the woods
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #95 on: January 26, 2018, 07:21:06 PM »
Good by and good riddance :hello:

Offline The scout

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 1112
  • Location: belfair
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #96 on: January 26, 2018, 07:51:23 PM »
 :yeah: itís so hard who to trust about any thing wdfw related though, time will tell, but this state seems doomed

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13973
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #97 on: January 27, 2018, 11:05:44 AM »

Offline fish vacuum

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2082
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #98 on: January 27, 2018, 04:22:09 PM »


http://www.king5.com/article/tech/science/environment/wdfw-director-resigns-after-demands-by-wildlife-activists/281-511618916


Lesson here is don't make Ron mad.


If the activists wanted him gone....we probably won't get a better replacement

Maybe. But the Ron referenced is the president of Puget Sound Anglers. It wasn't just activists who wanted him out. After the Chinook plan, a lot of us were contacting our reps and the commission to say that the director needed to pack his bags.

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 60
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Unsworth Resigns
« Reply #99 on: January 27, 2018, 04:35:48 PM »
Head over to bloodydecks and read Ron's version of events.  Sounds like Unsworth was a no-show at lots of important meetings.
:yeah:
No need to pour more salt on the wound, but anyone who questions why he needed to go should read what Ron Garner has posted.
Out playing at the pool while our fisheries are being lost.  Not the leadership we need.
Hopefully Joe Stohr can hold down the fort for now.

 

* Recent Topics

Input on Browning x-bolt hells canyon by zwickeyman
[Today at 11:17:59 PM]


Out of state Antelope hunt by zwickeyman
[Today at 11:16:20 PM]


WA Mountain Goat auction tag by trophyhunt
[Today at 10:50:52 PM]


high dollar cast iron by DoubleJ
[Today at 10:47:37 PM]


Guided Elk.....where would you go? by JWEBB
[Today at 10:47:34 PM]


7mm Rem Mag or 300 Win Mag for elk by Biggerhammer
[Today at 10:47:00 PM]


TC Black Diamond 50 cal by redi
[Today at 10:46:59 PM]


Commercial Fishing by Duckslayer89
[Today at 10:31:02 PM]


more antelope in Washington by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 10:23:21 PM]


Price to shorten a barrel by jdb
[Today at 10:19:08 PM]


I donít know why I am surprised by Humptulips
[Today at 10:05:57 PM]


Two custom flintlock rifles for sale by robescc
[Today at 10:01:05 PM]


Your Move 2018, Episode #1 by hornhunter1987
[Today at 09:57:09 PM]


Wtb: Trad stuff by cvandervort
[Today at 09:42:16 PM]


Stolen Springfield XDs .45acp by scottr
[Today at 09:42:14 PM]


Olympics Mountain Goat relocation public meeting by kevinlisa06
[Today at 09:35:24 PM]


840 rounds 7.62x51 by longtimerookie
[Today at 09:26:07 PM]


Wyoming elk results! by trophyhunt
[Today at 09:24:47 PM]


1022 aftermarket stock recommendations by KFhunter
[Today at 09:23:00 PM]


FS: CZ 612 tactical pump shotgun by chevyistop
[Today at 09:22:00 PM]