collapse

Author Topic: Interesting article  (Read 691 times)

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4582
  • Location: Chewelah

Offline chukarchaser

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 205
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2018, 09:26:18 PM »
 :yeah:

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2586
  • Location: where I be
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2018, 09:40:06 PM »
 :tup: and then work on reworking the disastrous wolf plan! Keep the momentum and heat on the shoddy science or politics that created a nightmare for washington ungulates and cattle.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 10:37:18 PM by mfswallace »
The Soady 2 Holer!!
Schevy Schooka Schit

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17779
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2018, 10:21:58 PM »
"It is telling that Wielgus did not use his own data to test his claim. Either itís inexcusably shoddy work, or an intentional obfuscation of the truth."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline chukarchaser

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 205
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2018, 08:58:46 PM »
My vote is for intentional

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1628
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2018, 07:21:14 AM »
Thanks PA BEN, great share

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 28285
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • NRA Life, MH, WFW, CCRKBA, NAGR, RMEF, WSB
Re: Interesting article
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2018, 07:32:55 AM »
My vote is for intentional

Either way, Wielgus has been outed for fabricating "data" to forward his animal rights agenda. Even WSU admonished him for tainted studies.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman