lefttop righttop
leftborder
rightborder
leftborder
collapse
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Mt Saint Helens.....This could be whats in store.  (Read 1090 times)
bbarnes
Hunter
***
Offline Offline

Location: Mt Saint Helens
Posts: 122



View Profile WWW
« on: April 30, 2009, 04:41:15 PM »

This was emailed to me and I thought I would share. Let the Mt. Saint Helens Advisory Commitee know your feelings before it is too late.  YIKES The NPCA is purshing hard in Washington DC to convert this into a national park. When you look at the maps attached below you will realize how our hunting opportunities will be reduced.

Axel Swanson         swansona@co.cowlitz.wa.us

Jim Adams             jima@nwinterp.org

Jim and Debbie Waters info@carsonridgebnb.com

Jim Sedell               jimsedell@yahoo.com

Lee Grose               bocc@co.lewis.wa.us

Maree Lerchen         maree@windermere.com

Sherie Weisser        dsweisser@gmail.com

Mark Plotkin            mark@visitmtsthelens.com

Mark Smith              ecoparkman@mac.com

Mary Kay Nelson     Info@VisitRainier.com

Nancy Parkes          n.parkes@comcast.net

Paul Pearce            pearce@co.skamania.wa.us

Casey Roeder         casey@skamania.org

Debbie Slack          slack@co.skamania.wa.us


Also, you should send your feedback to Sean Smith of the National Parks Conservation Association and tell him why this area should remain the same. THESE PEOPLE ARE NO FRIENDS TO OUR RECREATION!!!! Bad Idea

Sean Smith, M.S.

Director, NW Region

National Parks Conservation Association

Protecting Our National Parks for Future Generations

206.903.1444 x21

206.903.1448 fax

206-818-4041

ssmith@npca.org

313-A First Ave., South

Seattle, WA  98104


In addition, you should contact Congressman Brian Baird.





* Draft Concept Map E.pdf (234.23 KB - downloaded 77 times.)
* Draft Concept Map D.pdf (233.64 KB - downloaded 41 times.)
* Draft Concept Map C.pdf (246.69 KB - downloaded 29 times.)
* Draft Concept Map B.pdf (245.65 KB - downloaded 26 times.)
* Draft Concept Map A.pdf (256.38 KB - downloaded 32 times.)
* Brian Baird Letter.pdf (103.26 KB - downloaded 27 times.)
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 05:08:36 PM by bbarnes » Logged

saudog
Hunter
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2009, 06:42:00 PM »

Hey there,

You knew this wouldn't be done and over with.  What's with the "preserve" verbage?  Would they allow hunting in that area?

Logged
KillzElk
Tracker
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 85



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2009, 10:50:50 AM »

Thank you so much for the info BB this might make it simple for all to view..
Why is this 2008 have they all-ready made there mind up last year?







Logged
bbarnes
Hunter
***
Offline Offline

Location: Mt Saint Helens
Posts: 122



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2009, 04:08:08 PM »

After going to all of the meetings i can guarantee,there will be no hunting, horse back riding, mountain bike riding or snow mobiling.This group wont be happy untill everything is looked up, and its hands off.B Barnes KEEPING PULIC LANDS PUBLIC Shooting 2 Tree hugger1
Logged

JoeVon
Longhunter
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Castle Rock
Posts: 557



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2009, 06:13:57 PM »

Bruce, what is the "Mt. St. Helens Preserve" specified as?  What is its planned use ?  Will it be huntable?
Logged
Dean44
Hunter
***
Offline Offline

Location: SW WA
Posts: 183


-.-. --.-


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2009, 06:51:43 PM »

What is the deal with Map E? It is dated a year later than the others- April 2009, and shows even a lot of private land near Swift that would be part of the Park, along with a lot more public land. It is the most confiscatory option of them all. Not only are they trying to take our public hunting grounds but now they are going to confiscate private property? It just shows how emboldened they are now.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2009, 04:45:32 AM by Dean44 » Logged

    -.-.  --.-   -..  .   -..  .  .-  -.   .-  -  --  -.--  -  .-  .-.  --.  .  -  ...  .-.-.-  -.-.  ---  --
bbarnes
Hunter
***
Offline Offline

Location: Mt Saint Helens
Posts: 122



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2009, 08:42:53 PM »

The park service would not be specific and my advice to all sportsman is send all of your state reps and everyone on the advisory board a letter or email.Say NO
NATIONAL PARK at MT SAINT HELENS and keep our public lands public in a nice way.
We need to flood the advisory board and congressman and senators with emails and letters, this is the only way they will listen.There was a bill signed in march by congressman Baird called the HISTORIC PUBLIC LANDS BILL,and they received billions of dollars for historic lands to be purchased.Well my way of thinking is the mt and the area around it like, marble mt, goat marsh and the high lakes are historic lands and there for sale.We need to encourage the reps to buy this land, before it turns into subdivisions.B Barnes keeping public lands public.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 07:10:20 PM by bbarnes » Logged

Kain
Scalpless
Site Sponsor
Sourdough
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Vantucky, WA
Posts: 1877


VantuckyKain on PM


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2009, 12:11:47 PM »

Did I miss something?  WDFW GoHunt shows the area around Mount St. Helens being national park.

http://fortress.wa.gov/dfw/gispublic/apps/gohunt/default.htm?VIEW=Deer/Elk&BOX=1154812.480187849:231453.6139262148:1416842.782390197:415177.26091470895

Is this huntable?
Logged

Get your hunting-washington window decals here.  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,43015.0.html
Bob
Tracker
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2009, 12:14:13 PM »

the area that lays within the monument area is (national park)
Logged
bobcat
Global Moderator
Frontiersman
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 4757



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 29, 2009, 12:17:10 PM »

It's not a national park... it's a national monument.
Logged

I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Kain
Scalpless
Site Sponsor
Sourdough
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Vantucky, WA
Posts: 1877


VantuckyKain on PM


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2009, 12:18:29 PM »

I guess Im confused then.  The map legend says it is Federal-Park service.  It looks a lot like those maps posted above.  Can we hunt in that area or not?  Specifically that arm that drops into the Lewis River unit.
Logged

Get your hunting-washington window decals here.  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,43015.0.html
bobcat
Global Moderator
Frontiersman
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 4757



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2009, 12:38:50 PM »

Yes, national monuments you can hunt.

The only area down there you can't hunt is the Loo-wit GMU.
Logged

I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Kain
Scalpless
Site Sponsor
Sourdough
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Vantucky, WA
Posts: 1877


VantuckyKain on PM


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2009, 01:28:03 PM »

Thanks Bobcat.  I was pretty sure that was the case but after seeing the dark green on the map I thought they might have made it a national park after all.  I am easily confused.  chuckle chuckle
Logged

Get your hunting-washington window decals here.  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,43015.0.html
FrankDown
Longhunter
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 627


Natural Renewable Resources


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 04, 2009, 04:21:24 PM »

From readingthe letter and lookign at the maps they dont seem to know what direction it may take.  I dont see it set in stone as a national monument.  The maps show a park.  Either way it seems that they dont know or are being subversive about letting anyone know waht their full intent might be.

Whats wrong with the way it is now?
Logged
bobcat
Global Moderator
Frontiersman
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 4757



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 04, 2009, 05:50:55 PM »

They think they can get more money if it's a National Park rather than a National Monument.
Logged

I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 
Jump to:  



rightborder
leftborder
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal

Waltz design by IchBin
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.397 seconds with 19 queries.
leftbottomborder   rightbottomborder