11
« Last post by Dan-o on Today at 07:24:34 PM »
Hoping the video below will work…
This is the buck my son shot this year with my 6.5 PRC/Magnus combo at 190 yards. I was standing about 2 steps behind him and maybe 1-2 steps to the right in order to get the shot thru my spotter. Not everyone wants to hunt with a can the size of a Magnus, but I will take the size trade-offs all day long.
https://youtube.com/shorts/uPyWogOeXj0?feature=shared
Super cool video
12
« Last post by highside74 on Today at 07:23:37 PM »
If that's a black bear you probably won't ever find one bigger. I'd definitely put some effort into figuring it out.
13
« Last post by time2hunt on Today at 07:22:31 PM »
I support wood carved bows and chiseled broadheads mounted on a mustang!
Right after you navigate the roadless areas on your covered wagon and musket?
We All evolve and adapt to perpetuate what we value. 
The difference is we have rules and biologists that “try” to manage and make scientific decisions. They have no rules, and no care about what they’re doing.
That's a broad and inaccurate statement. As a matter of fact, several tribes are hunting wolves where our own WDFW has failed to do so, to help mule deer and elk populations for all of us, especially in the the NE corner. Several tribes have initiated projects which enhance and recover salmon populations - the Quinault and Lummi to name only two of many. I personally know tribal members who hunt according to existing regulations. No care about what they're doing? Sorry, that comment holds zero credibility. I'll admit that some natives will take great advantage of their hunting rights. And will also admit there are plenty of non-native poachers in this state doing the same thing. Clean up your own backyard before examining your neighbor's.
I understand your argument for those tribes. But this article and what we’re talking about doesn’t pertain to those tribes one bit. It’s about 1 tribe, and they don’t care. I live here, I see it on the daily. If you don’t live where this is taking place you truly cannot grasp the impact it’s having.
Tbar, lets not forget that this particular tribe (sovereign nation) does not have to license their vehicles in WA ST.....therefore not paying their share to maintain OUR public roadways they utilize (aka your "Right after you navigate the roadless areas on your covered wagon and musket? " comment. ) Maybe they should not be allowed to drive on State owned roadways....... at all!
Treat others as you would like to be treated......When one is allowed special treatment, but wants equality, that's where the issue is
The Yakama Treaty of 1855 has been upheld by the SCOTUS in 2019 that gives the rights to them to not have to pay taxes to travel on WA roads, including registration. If you have a problem with the treaty, your problem is with Congress and President Pierce, not the Yakama nation.
Quit drinking the woke cool aid Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
14
« Last post by highside74 on Today at 07:20:22 PM »
Hunted unit 5 today. Over the last 3 days. Saw 12 moose. 3 bucks and 40 does.
Missed a long shot on a nice buck.
Did find out today that all of Stimpson land is now owned by the tribes and are off limits. I thought it was only a select few but was corrected. Makes hunting unit 5 so much harder.
Leaving back to Washington in the morning with tag soup.
You took the 8th-15th off and you are going home after 3 days? Every day going forward should get better and better and the weather also.
15
« Last post by Buzzsaw461 on Today at 07:10:31 PM »
Another thing that chaps my hide, since it’s indigenous people month or whatever they call it, you see all these posts about how the land was stolen. That’s a bunch of BS, we all know that the natives stole each other’s land, raped, pillage and murdered each other for how many Thousands of years? So the white man was the last, so-called last, to take the land and that makes us the bad guys. I don’t believe we will be the last to “take” the land, the natives are doing a good job at buying it back. Especially the mucks.
Pretty much sums it up.
16
« Last post by jrebel on Today at 07:06:41 PM »
Big black bears often look like they have humps depending on the position of their arms. I have a lot of great pics of very large black bears that look like they have the grizzly hump.
The definitive would be the face and head.....but I still think it looks like a masher black bear given that pic. I'll post some pics of large black bears with humps in a bit.
17
Colville. I see a hump behind the neck. But I’ve only seen a few grizzlys in my life. Seen many black bears this thing was different
18
« Last post by trophyhunt on Today at 06:48:19 PM »
Another thing that chaps my hide, since it’s indigenous people month or whatever they call it, you see all these posts about how the land was stolen. That’s a bunch of BS, we all know that the natives stole each other’s land, raped, pillage and murdered each other for how many Thousands of years? So the white man was the last, so-called last, to take the land and that makes us the bad guys. I don’t believe we will be the last to “take” the land, the natives are doing a good job at buying it back. Especially the mucks.
19
« Last post by jrebel on Today at 06:41:35 PM »
Without seeing the head and face, it’s hard to say. I’m leaning big color phase (chocolate) black bear.
What’s the general area (state, east / west side, etc.). No specifics needed just general!
20
« Last post by Shooter4 on Today at 06:39:23 PM »
Hunted unit 5 today. Over the last 3 days. Saw 12 moose. 3 bucks and 40 does.
Missed a long shot on a nice buck.
Did find out today that all of Stimpson land is now owned by the tribes and are off limits. I thought it was only a select few but was corrected. Makes hunting unit 5 so much harder.
Leaving back to Washington in the morning with tag soup.
They lied it is a select few check the idfg website its a select amount
Advertisement
|
Recent Posts