collapse

Advertisement


Poll

How do you deal with elk - crop damage conflicts?

Elk population needs to be reduced in farmed areas?
20 (22.5%)
Farmers need to take ownership of land and maintain elk proof fence?
43 (48.3%)
WDFW needs to pay for farmers damage?
10 (11.2%)
Other Ideas?
16 (18%)

Total Members Voted: 89

Author Topic: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage  (Read 16156 times)

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 658
Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« on: February 25, 2013, 10:59:08 AM »
http://www.goskagit.com/all_access/herds-of-trouble/article_9b37c4fb-67e0-5205-811e-d5d1b00ab368.html


There is a growing concern for elk damage in the Skagit Valley.  As the population rebuilds in the core areas of the historical habitat, elk naturally spill over into the Skagit Valley.  Historically, elk have ranged in this area and the Valley was once a wintering area for elk and to some extent still is during harsh winters.  However, there are now resident elk that probably don't migrate in and out of the Valley.  How, do you increase what was a depressed population while managing for elk damage.  Any ideas. 


Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3274
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2013, 11:09:44 AM »
Farmers should take ownership of their lands period, exclamation point, exclamation point

Offline BIGINNER

  • YAR TOWN CRIER *************
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 3832
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2013, 11:12:52 AM »
farmers need to keep wolves on their property  :chuckle:
THIS MESSAGE WAS SENT USING MY TIME MACHINE.... SO THIS IS MY OPINION TOMORROW...

OH BY THE WAY. I FIGURED OUT HOW TO TURN ON CAP LOCKS ON MY PHONE... :IBCOOL:  :yike: :yike:

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 17764
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2013, 11:34:47 AM »
1000 elk, I think they under estimated the whole Nooksak herd size myself.

It is a daily gauntlet driving HWY 20, I cant count the near misses I have had.

They need to start culling the valley dewelling herd down a bit, seeing up to 150+ elk year around down low is crazy.  :twocents:

Master hunter program along with draw tags just isn't cutting it!  :twocents:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2889
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2013, 11:40:52 AM »
It's an interesting one to say the least. When there was a general muzzleloader season it kept them somewhat contained, if you were to move the border a little north it may help. A well defined border and enforcement would be a big issue with this idea.
The #of mini farms and cultivated land in the river bottom has also experienced a boom. Combine this with the fact that sierra Pacific has a largely monoculture tree farm (not criticizing ). The grass is greener on the other side so to speak.
Now to the more controversial side of things, the archers and master Hunters.  When it switched from muzzy to archery you lose most if the effectiveness. Although I don't question the effectiveness of an archer or his equipment,i think a seal bomb has a greater hazing effect and the overall kill #s were not substantial.
 The master hunter program is ineffective to say the least. I think it's the worst approach that the wdfw has taken. It's a joke when you consider all the paperwork and man hours put into such a limited pool of Hunters. The elk will be in the "killing fields" sometimes days before there is the coordination to get one on the ground. I also question the timing of when the majority of their harvest occurs. I know the muzzy season ran late but harvest was more spread out during a long season. I could go on and on.

Offline 50CalJim

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 659
  • Location: Birdsview/Startup
  • 5th yr in a row I've drawn a Special Permit.
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2013, 12:02:18 PM »
Looks like their gonna give out 20 Cow Tags in the 4941 area which probably means the Indians will also get 20 tags also. If everybody behaves themselves  :rolleyes: maybe they will give out more in the future who knows. But personally I think with it being pretty much all private its gonna turn into another Cluster@$&#. :bash:

Offline jackmaster

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 7011
  • Location: graham
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2013, 12:06:34 PM »
yeah transplant them to the saint helens area after they kill all the elk with hoof rot, no point in just killn them or open up alot of youth tags for that area  :tup:
my grandpa always said "if it aint broke dont fix it"

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9063
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2013, 12:18:05 PM »
Corall those that go onto the farm land and load them into a trailer and locate them north east of Mt. Baker or down towards Duvall, etc.  They could start a heard north of Winthrop as well instead of shooting them all.  :dunno:
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 6453
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2013, 12:24:55 PM »
Here's the problem:

Yummy thick green grass in the valley vs brown, dry mountains filled with bears and cougars:


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2013, 12:37:34 PM »
I think its an issue of differing opinions. In that area you have some people that Are pro hunting and either will allow permission, or you have those that view them as thier pets and want no harm done. Many hobby farm owners do not see the cause and effect of allowing, or not, hunting. I  Like h2ofowler's idea of capturing and moving some to start an new area with some herds.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline 50CalJim

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 659
  • Location: Birdsview/Startup
  • 5th yr in a row I've drawn a Special Permit.
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2013, 12:58:11 PM »
Like it or not the Tribes pretty much controls what goes on with this Herd. They want to increase the Nooksack Herd to about 1,900 or so. I don't see any kind of relocation happening besides no money in the budget.

Offline Gringo31

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 5605
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2013, 01:49:49 PM »
If it is a tribe issue, then there is little you or I will do to change it.

I would like to know what this means...

Quote
Farmers should take ownership of their lands period, exclamation point, exclamation point
We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
-Ronald Reagan

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2889
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2013, 01:58:44 PM »
Looks like their gonna give out 20 Cow Tags in the 4941 area which probably means the Indians will also get 20 tags also. If everybody behaves themselves  :rolleyes: maybe they will give out more in the future who knows. But personally I think with it being pretty much all private its gonna turn into another Cluster@$&#. :bash:
Would this not conflict the wdfw's stance. Would it not fall under their jurisdiction and be a violation of Chambers.

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3274
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2013, 02:05:57 PM »
If it is a tribe issue, then there is little you or I will do to change it.

I would like to know what this means...

Quote
Farmers should take ownership of their lands period, exclamation point, exclamation point

I guess that there is 2 ways to look at it.  Does the state want to use private property for elk wintering grounds and compensate the farmer for their land use, or is the state just paying for crop damage due to the land being over it's carrying capacity?  I agree with the first but not the 2nd. 

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2889
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Native Elk - Increased Crop Damage
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2013, 02:09:20 PM »
 
Corall those that go onto the farm land and load them into a trailer and locate them north east of Mt. Baker or down towards Duvall, etc.  They could start a heard north of Winthrop as well instead of shooting them all.  :dunno:
This sounds good in theory but if you have ever been involved in a relocation or even an augmentation you would realize that this is probably not a viable option. (especially at this time).
I can see where the farmer is coming from when he says it's a private hunting club, but there aren't too many options when you are dealing with 100%private land. A large scale kill would be a temporary fix at best, same with a move.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:00:45 PM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by xXLojackXx
[Today at 11:47:13 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal