collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ethical question on hunting does  (Read 14307 times)

Offline Rob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4432
  • Location: Sandpoint ID
Ethical question on hunting does
« on: October 19, 2016, 08:29:57 AM »
I have not spent much time hunting doe deer before.  This time of year, many does are still with their yearlings.  I would assume that the yearlings are old enough to survive without their mothers, but I am hesitant to pull the trigger on a doe with a yearling nearby.

What are the ethics behind this one?
_______________________________________
Sit tall in the saddle, hold you head up high.
Keep your eyes fixed on where the trail meets the sky.
Live like you ain’t afraid to die.
Just sit back and enjoy your ride
  - Chris Ledoux

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1063
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2016, 08:32:24 AM »
IMO if the GMU is open for does than it is perfectly ethical.  There is a reason those units are open for management

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 14483
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2016, 08:40:23 AM »
Ethics are the toughest thing out there and something that you have to decide for yourself.  I can say that it is legal, the fawn will probably make it through the winter and you have to decide from there.  Keep in mind there is no guarantee that the fawn will make it through the winter even with it's mother.

I think this is one that many hunters struggle with.  Good luck on your decision.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7294
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2016, 09:10:24 AM »
I think Fawn mortality depends more on winter weather, predators, cars and food not mommy for company.  Sure it makes it harder to stay safe but doesn't directly cause death.  Heck they may stay more concealed an do better from that?  Does lead em on roads all the time.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4622
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2016, 09:15:30 AM »
I have not spent much time hunting doe deer before.  This time of year, many does are still with their yearlings.  I would assume that the yearlings are old enough to survive without their mothers, but I am hesitant to pull the trigger on a doe with a yearling nearby.

What are the ethics behind this one?

Having the doe around will not have a significant affect on the likelihood of survival for the fawn.  However, if you can, shoot a doe without a fawn.  She is barren for a reason, either age, low fertility (this is a hereditary trait), bad teeth, etc.  By removing her, you are reducing competition for cover, food, bucks that are better spent on the does that have fawns.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42831
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2016, 09:20:03 AM »
They allow doe hunting in certain units for reasons of wildlife management. When the population reaches a certain ratio of bucks to does, they'll add antler restrictions or allow doe hunting by draw only. And yes, the fawns are old enough to fend for themselves. No ethical dilemma here unless it's one you create for yourself.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline Widgeondeke

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3337
  • Location: Lake Stevens, WA
  • US Army Infantry 91-98
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2016, 09:34:36 AM »
the only way I wouldn't take a legal doe is if the fawn was a late bloomer and still had spots.  Other than that, pick the biggest bodied doe and BOOM.   :twocents:

Offline npaull

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1080
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2016, 10:51:50 AM »
Those yearlings are all about to be kicked out by the does anyway. They do not die if the doe is killed. I do not believe there is any ethical problem at all shooting a doe with a yearling.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 49687
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2016, 10:55:58 AM »
I choose not to, one because that means she is fertile and could have a baby again next year.  Coupled with my disagreement with current deer management practices. I don't believe an antlerless hunt should be going on right now with the current herd status for most locales.   I don't think money and oppurtunity to appease the population should be the reason for an antlerless hunt.   

Offline Chesapeake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1002
  • Location: Washougal
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2016, 03:41:24 PM »
Not sure about ethics but I can tell you it'll all but break your heart to be trying to gut a doe while its yearling stands by looking totally lost and confused without even the gumption to run away. I cant help but think a bit more time with mom around would help with survivability. Its not like the does ever kick them out like bears. They seem to hang with the same family group for life.

I try hard not to kill does or cows with yearlings. Not that I'd fault a guy for taking a legal animal.


Offline EmeraldBullet

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 462
  • Location: Washington State
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2016, 03:58:09 PM »
If it's legal it's because a state paid biologist said that too many does exist for the current habitat. I'm not a bio so I will take their word for it and if they are wrong then shame on them.

Offline elkboy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 1703
  • Location: Whitman County
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2016, 04:05:38 PM »
I have tried to err on the side of not taking a doe that is clearly accompanied by a yearling.  I do hunt whitetailed deer in the Palouse, which means that I usually have a clear view of the deer as they move out into agricultural fields.  This means I usually have the luxury of making that decision!  Making that judgement with blacktail does would be harder in the dense cover of the west side of the state. 

I did glance at the scientific literature, and the consensus across papers seems to be that yearlings don't pay a major survival penalty if their dams (mothers) are harvested in the fall of the year.  Buck yearlings may actually do better if their mother is harvested, since the young buck will not be forced to emigrate from their mother's home range (Holzenbein and Marchinton 1992, J. Wildl. Mgmt). 

All that said, I have taken more does than bucks in my time, since I am basically a meat hunter.  Also, a tag filled with a doe instead of a buck can help correct low buck:herd ratios in some areas.   

Good luck.  Kudos for thinking broadly about the herd! 


Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5880
  • Location: colville
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2016, 04:07:07 PM »
I have not spent much time hunting doe deer before.  This time of year, many does are still with their yearlings.  I would assume that the yearlings are old enough to survive without their mothers, but I am hesitant to pull the trigger on a doe with a yearling nearby.

What are the ethics behind this one?

Having the doe around will not have a significant affect on the likelihood of survival for the fawn.  However, if you can, shoot a doe without a fawn.  She is barren for a reason, either age, low fertility (this is a hereditary trait), bad teeth, etc.  By removing her, you are reducing competition for cover, food, bucks that are better spent on the does that have fawns.

Youre saying if a doe doesnt have fawns this time of year its because shes barren, due to health issues.  Im going to have to strongly disagree.  A high percentage of does in my area have no fawns by october.  The reason is predators, not the does health.  Bears, cougars, wolves, coyotes, hell ive seen vultures take out a newborn fawn.

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5880
  • Location: colville
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2016, 04:19:36 PM »
Those yearlings are all about to be kicked out by the does anyway.

Not until next summer when shes getting ready to drop new fawns.  Even then the doe fawns will commonly start hanging out with mom again to some extent when fall rolls around.  Bucks usually move on to establish new home ranges around 1.5 yrs old.  Ive seen one stick with momma until he was 2.5.  Just my observations.  Im no deer biologist.

Offline blackveltbowhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 3935
  • BLAM
Re: Ethical question on hunting does
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2016, 04:25:48 PM »
Ethics are up to the individual to define. I am not sure this falls into ethics category myself, but if asking how I go deciding whether to take a doe or not I will share.

My decision to shoot a doe is based primarily on my personal assessment of herd quality and dynamics in the specific location I am hunting. For example within a given GMU I may hunt an area on private timber or state land and observe low deer numbers, low fawn survival, high hunter success and TO ME taking a doe does not make much sense even if legal. However I could drive 15 minutes away to a private land apple tree and have a dozen deer invading Mrs. Smiths prized lawn flora and not hesitate to shoot and be excited for the opportunity. I also tend to wait till very late on archery tags and do attempt to take does that appear to be solo. But that is an emotional response and not based on actual scientific data that fawns are less likely to survive.

In the end if hunted legally, meat taken care of and used properly, and killed as humanely as possible you have fulfilled your duty as a hunter IMO.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Springer 2024 Columbia River by Blacklab
[Today at 02:35:54 PM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by Blacklab
[Today at 12:48:56 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by dilleytech
[Today at 12:39:19 PM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:03:27 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal