collapse
Free Domestic Economy Shipping Be a more successful hunter!

Poll

Should the minimum caliber rule be removed

Yes, Remove it.
19 (17.4%)
No, leave it as is
65 (59.6%)
No, but it the minimum should change
7 (6.4%)
Yes, remove it and implement a rule similar to other states that allow .224 centerfire
18 (16.5%)
Other, if you chose this option please explain why
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 109

Author Topic: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?  (Read 2890 times)

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2909
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2017, 12:00:57 PM »
Leave it.

Offline garrett89

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2017
  • Posts: 386
  • Location: KingCo
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2017, 11:43:44 PM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Online headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1169
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2017, 05:53:13 AM »
The only thing I would change would be to make 20 gauge (slugs) legal for elk hunting. 

Offline JDHasty

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6777
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2017, 09:12:16 AM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Not to mention many of the people advocating for this change  are also the same people who:

- Claim to know better what terminal ballistics to expect than does the bullet manufacturer who has tested thousands upon thousands of their bullets, using the scientific method, and have tested those same bullets extensively on game animals and have analyzed enough data to come up with a statistically valid conclusion. 

- Claim to have wind doping abilities that if true would suggest that they belong in the U.S. International Shooting Hall of Fame

...
 

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Chris McCarthy
  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 5919
  • Volleyfire brigade
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2017, 09:24:15 AM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Not to mention many of the people advocating for this change  are also the same people who:

- Claim to know better what terminal ballistics to expect than does the bullet manufacturer who has tested thousands upon thousands of their bullets, using the scientific method, and have tested those same bullets extensively on game animals and have analyzed enough data to come up with a statistically valid conclusion. 

- Claim to have wind doping abilities that if true would suggest that they belong in the U.S. International Shooting Hall of Fame

...
Here we go again...  :rolleyes:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 34323
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #30 on: February 09, 2017, 09:53:35 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 16855
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #31 on: February 09, 2017, 10:15:47 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


That's the old packaging. It's been recently updated.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Chris McCarthy
  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 5919
  • Volleyfire brigade
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #32 on: February 09, 2017, 10:18:26 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


That's the old packaging. It's been recently updated.
:chuckle:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 17633
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #33 on: February 09, 2017, 10:33:31 AM »
That was good.  :chuckle:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((>` ><((((>. ><((((>.><((((>

Offline dontgetcrabs

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1743
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #34 on: February 09, 2017, 10:36:01 AM »
Too funny.   :tup:   :chuckle:

 

* Recent Topics

2006 Ford expedition 5.4l squeal while trying to start by Woodchuck
[Today at 10:56:57 AM]


FS spot hogg hunter 7 pin by Elkeatr
[Today at 10:48:34 AM]


Nutria litter size by Machias
[Today at 10:47:20 AM]


Wyoming elk results! by trophyhunt
[Today at 10:46:29 AM]


Gray wolves return to Mt. Hood forest by wolfbait
[Today at 10:45:12 AM]


Wolf poacher fined in Pend Oreille County by wolfbait
[Today at 10:40:48 AM]


Wallowa County Wolves by wolfbait
[Today at 10:32:31 AM]


Selecting a Longer Range Scope by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 10:23:12 AM]


Swarvoski spotter by BENCHLEG
[Today at 10:19:56 AM]


What gloves in cold weather? by Greg Mullins
[Today at 10:13:50 AM]


What strings you shoot? by Greg Mullins
[Today at 10:13:27 AM]


Rate my bow setup by Greg Mullins
[Today at 10:08:49 AM]


With all this custom rifle talk.... by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 10:00:20 AM]


A new ride!!! by Alchase
[Today at 10:00:07 AM]


Stolen Toyota by johnnyaustin44
[Today at 09:49:14 AM]


Used truck questions by Alchase
[Today at 09:41:22 AM]


Project truck by Skillet
[Today at 09:29:02 AM]


Any feed back on leupold vx-3i lrp 8.5-25x50mm? by Alchase
[Today at 09:26:42 AM]


Nikon Monarch 4-16x50 BDC Scope new - only took it to the range once -$450 by nicz
[Today at 09:02:16 AM]


Your favorite go too weapon for coyote hunting by Evil_EdwardO
[Today at 08:58:19 AM]