collapse
Quality Hunts for over 30 Years Be a more successful hunter!

Poll

Should the minimum caliber rule be removed

Yes, Remove it.
19 (17.6%)
No, leave it as is
65 (60.2%)
No, but it the minimum should change
6 (5.6%)
Yes, remove it and implement a rule similar to other states that allow .224 centerfire
18 (16.7%)
Other, if you chose this option please explain why
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 108

Author Topic: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?  (Read 1512 times)

Offline Stein

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1766
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2017, 12:00:57 PM »
Leave it.

Offline garrett89

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2017
  • Posts: 400
  • Location: KingCo
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #26 on: February 08, 2017, 11:43:44 PM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1095
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2017, 05:53:13 AM »
The only thing I would change would be to make 20 gauge (slugs) legal for elk hunting. 

Offline JDHasty

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 4495
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #28 on: February 09, 2017, 09:12:16 AM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Not to mention many of the people advocating for this change  are also the same people who:

- Claim to know better what terminal ballistics to expect than does the bullet manufacturer who has tested thousands upon thousands of their bullets, using the scientific method, and have tested those same bullets extensively on game animals and have analyzed enough data to come up with a statistically valid conclusion. 

- Claim to have wind doping abilities that if true would suggest that they belong in the U.S. International Shooting Hall of Fame

...
 

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 5712
  • Volleyfire brigade
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #29 on: February 09, 2017, 09:24:15 AM »
I voted to leave it alone. If removed you could get people trying to prove how good a shot they are and start taking unnecessary risks of wounding animals. It's similar to people who fish for salmon with trout gear for the fight. The difference is you might wound an animal that runs off and dies and is wasted or doesn't die and is mutilated. :twocents:

This is true. One little mistake in shooting the animal will suffer if the round was a bit too small. I 100% agree with your statement. Cockiness destroys.

Not to mention many of the people advocating for this change  are also the same people who:

- Claim to know better what terminal ballistics to expect than does the bullet manufacturer who has tested thousands upon thousands of their bullets, using the scientific method, and have tested those same bullets extensively on game animals and have analyzed enough data to come up with a statistically valid conclusion. 

- Claim to have wind doping abilities that if true would suggest that they belong in the U.S. International Shooting Hall of Fame

...
Here we go again...  :rolleyes:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 32726
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #30 on: February 09, 2017, 09:53:35 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 15164
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #31 on: February 09, 2017, 10:15:47 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


That's the old packaging. It's been recently updated.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 5712
  • Volleyfire brigade
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #32 on: February 09, 2017, 10:18:26 AM »
Winchester apparently feels their 64 grain 223 Remington load is adequate for deer:


That's the old packaging. It's been recently updated.
:chuckle:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 16488
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #33 on: February 09, 2017, 10:33:31 AM »
That was good.  :chuckle:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((>` ><((((>. ><((((>.><((((>

Offline dontgetcrabs

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1700
Re: Should the minumum caliber restriction exist?
« Reply #34 on: February 09, 2017, 10:36:01 AM »
Too funny.   :tup:   :chuckle:

 

* Recent Topics

Sea sickness by LabChamp
[Today at 04:46:41 AM]


Gonzaga - On to the Elite 8 by vandeman17
[Today at 04:32:49 AM]


Geico for car insurance? by Special T
[Today at 02:37:41 AM]


Wild Hogs in Washington by bowtechian
[Today at 02:24:24 AM]


Favorite whiskey by Special T
[Today at 02:22:54 AM]


What to do in Montana this Summer????? by bowtechian
[Today at 01:48:00 AM]


P320 - Glock 17 by 762Armo
[Today at 12:38:05 AM]


Elk dropping horns by funkster
[Yesterday at 11:49:52 PM]


Mel's Hole? by Eric M
[Yesterday at 11:38:37 PM]


Some Taxidermy for Sale by Gobble Gobble
[Yesterday at 11:31:25 PM]


Re: Word Association Game by REHJWA
[Yesterday at 11:31:15 PM]


Pickup cranks normally but won't start. '07 F150 by BDildine
[Yesterday at 11:28:26 PM]


Disabled hunters by hunter399
[Yesterday at 11:21:09 PM]


In search of a jet by hollymaster
[Yesterday at 11:09:31 PM]


BHA Stream Access Pledge by JLS
[Yesterday at 10:41:14 PM]


Pay it Forward by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:21:50 PM]


Elk Calling Contest - Official Announcement! by huntbow
[Yesterday at 10:21:01 PM]


End of season trap prep by ouchfoss
[Yesterday at 10:17:23 PM]


Pasture Fence Preference - Barbed Wire or Electric? by lhrbull
[Yesterday at 10:09:09 PM]


For Sale Vortex Viper 15-45x65mm Spotter by ian_padron
[Yesterday at 10:02:12 PM]