collapse

Author Topic: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction  (Read 2724 times)

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 26658
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: WFW, WSTA, WSB, WPHA, FWM, NRA, SCI, RMEF, NAHC, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #50 on: April 20, 2017, 03:36:44 PM »
People in WA are already sharing the land with many predators, the predators are already moving back and forth on their own, there's certainly no need to waste taxpayer money transporting them from place to place to appease a few greenies!
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://trophymaps.com "Do-It-Yourself" Hunting Maps" 
http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided, Semi-Guided, Unguided, and Drop Camp Hunts in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Washington. Hunts with tags available (no draw) spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf!

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 15551
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #51 on: April 20, 2017, 03:37:40 PM »
The answer is NO! Why? Currently the frizz move up and down the valleys that take them back and forth to lightly inhabited areas of Canada.  If introduced other places "down the valley" will be places like Arlington, Sulton, and Sedro Woolley, perhaps North Bend, Carnation and Duvall.

The elk that were transplanted in the "Nooksack" don't seem to stay in the mountains they much prefer the farmers feild and peoples back yards... why would we think Bears would be any Different?

Just because we Can, doesn't mean we Should...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline Ironhead

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1058
  • Location: Mad River
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #52 on: April 20, 2017, 05:06:50 PM »
The answer is NO! Why? Currently the frizz move up and down the valleys that take them back and forth to lightly inhabited areas of Canada.  If introduced other places "down the valley" will be places like Arlington, Sulton, and Sedro Woolley, perhaps North Bend, Carnation and Duvall.

The elk that were transplanted in the "Nooksack" don't seem to stay in the mountains they much prefer the farmers feild and peoples back yards... why would we think Bears would be any Different?

Just because we Can, doesn't mean we Should...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk



Because I would like to know what is going to make up the other 15 to 25 percent of their diet. It doesn't seem like a good idea to introduce another predator if they don't have a current working model, why should we be the Guinea Pigs?
 I think they will likely move down to less populated areas with higher deer concentrations such as the Sinlahekin, Methow and Entiat Valleys.
This is just another shot in the Dark, like the original wolf introduction in Idaho. More BS being shoved down our throats.
"The problem with quotes on Internet Forums is, that it is often difficult to verify their authenticity." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline winshooter88

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 641
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #53 on: April 20, 2017, 05:53:52 PM »
A friend of mine who works in wildlife management in this state, (not WDFW)  went through the grizzly bear recovery plan and it was his opinion that going to the meetings that they had around the state would have been a waste of time. he believes that they have already decided what they are going to do and just had the meetings so they could say they asked the public. It is kind of like WDFW saying they had broad public support because people want more opportunities to hunt and fish but most of the direct comments about the fee increases were negative. they chose to look at the data to show that a fee increase was supported when increased opportunity was supported not a fee increase. I have been to all kinds of meetings in the last few years in regards to wildlife and recreation and it is very common for the government entities to say the public wants something when they don't, and also to come into the public comment meetings already knowing wht they plan to do no matter what the public really says. IMHO

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 26658
  • Location: Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: WFW, WSTA, WSB, WPHA, FWM, NRA, SCI, RMEF, NAHC, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #54 on: April 20, 2017, 10:52:40 PM »
A friend of mine who works in wildlife management in this state, (not WDFW)  went through the grizzly bear recovery plan and it was his opinion that going to the meetings that they had around the state would have been a waste of time. he believes that they have already decided what they are going to do and just had the meetings so they could say they asked the public. It is kind of like WDFW saying they had broad public support because people want more opportunities to hunt and fish but most of the direct comments about the fee increases were negative. they chose to look at the data to show that a fee increase was supported when increased opportunity was supported not a fee increase. I have been to all kinds of meetings in the last few years in regards to wildlife and recreation and it is very common for the government entities to say the public wants something when they don't, and also to come into the public comment meetings already knowing wht they plan to do no matter what the public really says. IMHO

I couldn't agree more... it's just a show to say they did the public meetings!
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://trophymaps.com "Do-It-Yourself" Hunting Maps" 
http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided, Semi-Guided, Unguided, and Drop Camp Hunts in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Washington. Hunts with tags available (no draw) spring bear, fall bear, buffalo, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, wolf!

Offline jasnt

  • Predator hunter
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 4052
  • Location: deer park
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #55 on: April 21, 2017, 06:14:39 AM »
:yeah:
🐾

"... we cannot change the fact that people will act in a certain way. We cannot change the inevitable. The only thing we can do is play on the one string we have, and that is our attitude. I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% of how I react to it. And so it is with you... we are in charge of our Attitudes."
Charles R. Swindoll

Offline konradcountry

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 153
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #56 on: April 24, 2017, 02:03:21 PM »
But the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation obligates us to use sound SCIENCE when considering wildlife management, something we hunters love to accuse the hardline enviros of abusing in favor of emotion (often rightfully so in my opinion). Science tells us these animals mostly chow down on sedge grasses, berries, insects and rodents.

Conservation is more a matter of values than science.

Science is a tool that can be used for any purpose including both protecting or eliminating a species.

The real issue is that environmentalists value animals over people and will always advocate for the animal especially in the context of hunting. We saw this with Idaho where they didn't care if the wolf population could support a hunt. Once the population was deemed sustainable the environmentalists changed their argument to some arbitrary claim of "future concerns" and didn't care about data.

Environmentalists only pretend to care about data. Once they get the upper hand they don't care about your scientific studies. They think bears are wonderful and hunters are evil. That is all there is to it. For environmentalists this is a political game and not a real debate about conservation

Offline konradcountry

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 153
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #57 on: April 24, 2017, 02:27:39 PM »
I would not bring up hunting at all. I would take the defensive of hikers. Feds are more likely to have environmentalists and anti-hunters in their ranks.

Some key points to make:

People will be killed by grizzlies. This is an undeniable fact and there are cases where people used bear spray and were still attacked. So even if people are 100% prepared (which is an unreasonable expectation) people will still be killed.

Western Washington is not Montana or Alaska. It has a dense coastal population and a lot of hikers. The Pacific Crest Trail goes through the North Cascades. This is not a remote area that is rarely accessed by people.

So what is the point of killing people? What will you tell the families of the hikers? The grizzly population is not endangered so why sacrifice the lives of hikers?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 15551
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #58 on: April 24, 2017, 03:40:19 PM »
I concur with emphasising hiking.  At the Skagit County meeting an older lady from the Alpine club emphasised the likely hood of Griz hunting women whom are near their time of the month.  She was pretty upset about introduction, and by no means a hunting fan. She was also part of the core group that got the N Cascades turned into a National Park. 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline Bushcraft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 245
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: Open comment period for grizzly bear introduction
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2017, 08:04:35 AM »
I would not bring up hunting at all. I would take the defensive of hikers. Feds are more likely to have environmentalists and anti-hunters in their ranks.

Some key points to make:

People will be killed by grizzlies. This is an undeniable fact and there are cases where people used bear spray and were still attacked. So even if people are 100% prepared (which is an unreasonable expectation) people will still be killed.

Western Washington is not Montana or Alaska. It has a dense coastal population and a lot of hikers. The Pacific Crest Trail goes through the North Cascades. This is not a remote area that is rarely accessed by people.

So what is the point of killing people? What will you tell the families of the hikers? The grizzly population is not endangered so why sacrifice the lives of hikers?


But the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation obligates us to use sound SCIENCE when considering wildlife management, something we hunters love to accuse the hardline enviros of abusing in favor of emotion (often rightfully so in my opinion). Science tells us these animals mostly chow down on sedge grasses, berries, insects and rodents.

Conservation is more a matter of values than science.

Science is a tool that can be used for any purpose including both protecting or eliminating a species.

The real issue is that environmentalists value animals over people and will always advocate for the animal especially in the context of hunting. We saw this with Idaho where they didn't care if the wolf population could support a hunt. Once the population was deemed sustainable the environmentalists changed their argument to some arbitrary claim of "future concerns" and didn't care about data.

Environmentalists only pretend to care about data. Once they get the upper hand they don't care about your scientific studies. They think bears are wonderful and hunters are evil. That is all there is to it. For environmentalists this is a political game and not a real debate about conservation

Truer words have not been spoken.
Liberalism is the philosophy of Western suicide.

*Proud supporter of NRA, SCI, SCIF, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC

 

* Recent Topics

2017 Special Permits Results by huntnphool
[Today at 01:19:04 AM]


Black bear hunts in Canada by Shooting Stix
[Today at 01:08:22 AM]


Weyerhaeuser Permits on sale now by JeffRaines
[Today at 12:23:26 AM]


Mountain goat conflict reduction by warthog
[Yesterday at 11:37:20 PM]


Wells Dam by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 11:35:53 PM]


Idaho Bird by lokidog
[Yesterday at 11:15:50 PM]


never thought I would see it, Sturgeon is open upper columbia! by TommyH
[Yesterday at 11:13:12 PM]


City Councilmember asks to sign Kaepernick by DaveMonti
[Yesterday at 11:12:42 PM]


Turkey help long story but good by Polo
[Yesterday at 11:00:21 PM]


Sanitizing RV fresh water tank by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:53:00 PM]


Good start to the season by lokidog
[Yesterday at 10:33:12 PM]


AKC Yellow (FOX RED) Puppies by Old Dog
[Yesterday at 10:23:22 PM]


APP Update! (ElkNut) by northwesthunter84
[Yesterday at 10:19:23 PM]


WTS Ruger LC9 by Chase2008
[Yesterday at 10:09:29 PM]


Washington Antelope by hunting4sanity
[Yesterday at 10:08:38 PM]


Put in for your permits sooner than later!!! by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:06:15 PM]


Looking for a driver for may 26 to Portland by Fastass350
[Yesterday at 10:01:31 PM]


Idaho Bear Baiting by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:58:26 PM]


Today, the day the circus died by mfswallace
[Yesterday at 09:52:05 PM]


Big Huck Boar by Stickerbush
[Yesterday at 09:48:22 PM]