collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Another elk poaching case  (Read 2255 times)

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4860
  • Location: Chewelah
Another elk poaching case
« on: May 09, 2017, 08:00:14 PM »

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2017, 08:26:43 PM »
2014 - Old news

Agree makes one wonder.

I also wonder how many people no these types of crimes can be a limiting factor for a GMU.  The additive harvest can really hurt populations.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5836
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2017, 10:18:27 AM »
My knowledge is dated but there were quite a few studies 1970s-1990s which looked at big game poaching rates, detection rates, and conviction rates.  Around the country, poaching (defined as illegal harvest) ranged from less than 50% to more than 100% of legal harvest.  Detection rates (not arrests or identification of suspects, just detection that a crime was likely committed) ranged from 1% to 10%.  Conviction rates as a percentage of poaching was less than 1%. 

My guess is that with incentives (e.g., points and cash rewards), an increasingly urbanized population and cell phones that poaching rates may have declined and detection and conviction rates increased nationally.  Where there is tribal hunting I suspect detection rates are low, as it is difficult to determine whether an animal was poached out of season or is a legal tribal harvest.

Poaching is definitely a limiting factor when it comes to legal hunting, costing legal hunters both opportunity and harvest.  Shorter seasons, smaller bag limits, worse season timing are all means of compensating for poaching losses when legal + illegal harvest is a limiting factor for populations.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Springer 2024 Columbia River by Taco280AI
[Today at 03:45:23 PM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by Blacklab
[Today at 12:48:56 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by dilleytech
[Today at 12:39:19 PM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:03:27 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal