collapse
Helping Big Game Hunters experience adventures all over the world. Guided Moose And Black Bear Hunts

Author Topic: moose 10 pts or less?  (Read 4199 times)

Offline Bullkllr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2901
  • Location: Graham
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #50 on: May 14, 2017, 01:24:08 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?

"yoogle that on your google"

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 625
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #51 on: May 14, 2017, 01:42:18 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
I'm thinking if you don't ultimately draw a tag they count you as unsuccessful in the summary yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 15730
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #52 on: May 14, 2017, 02:13:31 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Stein

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2053
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #53 on: May 14, 2017, 03:47:42 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.

Offline Bullkllr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2901
  • Location: Graham
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #54 on: May 14, 2017, 04:12:31 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.

That makes sense  :tup:

So in many categories (less for OILs), a lot with the top points seem to be doing points only. Someone has 29 points for antlerless elk, and bought another point. In fact, only 1 of the 33 with 20 or more points didn't do points only for antlerless elk (and didn't draw Pine Mtn. Ranch fwiw). Plausible; still seems a bit weird.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2017, 04:31:50 PM by Bullkllr »
"yoogle that on your google"

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 15730
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #55 on: May 14, 2017, 04:25:25 PM »
There are several individuals with maximum points who apply for points only, which may be part of the reason they have max points.

So, do you think the summary lists them as "unsuccessful" if they applied for points only?
The column is titled "Winning" and points only applications would not be considered a winning application.

That makes sense  :tup:

So in many categories (less for OILs), a lot with the top points seem to be doing "points only" then.
That is most likely the case. In addition, some applicants with maximum points have a bias. They are applying for the most difficult to draw hunts, and possibly only applying for one hunt choice versus multiple hunts.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 625
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #56 on: May 14, 2017, 06:18:16 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 15730
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #57 on: May 14, 2017, 06:21:31 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline andrew_in_idaho

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 625
  • Location: Nampa, ID
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #58 on: May 14, 2017, 07:07:28 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.

I would venture to guess that the 3 extra names in the hat is far outweighed by the 1000's of people who are gaining an extra 10 or 20 names in the hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 15730
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #59 on: May 14, 2017, 07:14:04 PM »
Any way you slice it, there were 677,975 names in the hat.  Even with 23 points, your chance of being drawn first was 0.078%.  There were 35 tags and you could put in for four choices, but your odds are dismal even with max points. 

Plus, max and max-1 didn't draw and only 4 out of 142 people with 20+ points drew.  This is where you get point creep, when there aren't enough tags to clear out the people at the top and the number of names in the hat grows exponentially every year.
Everybody's odds are decreasing every year, those with higher points are just decreasing at a slightly lower rate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Applicants with low point totals have increasing odds. Someone with one point has one name in the hat this year; next year he will have four: a 300% increase. That's the primary reason overall odds decrease.

I would venture to guess that the 3 extra names in the hat is far outweighed by the 1000's of people who are gaining an extra 10 or 20 names in the hat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
On average, the total number of "names in the hat" for quality hunts increases by about 15% per year. Someone with one point gets 300% more points going from year one to year two, and thus gains ground. Someone with 20 points gets only 10% more points going from year 20 to year 21 (400 to 441), and thus loses ground.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Miles

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3020
  • Location: Colorado
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #60 on: May 19, 2017, 08:46:47 AM »
I wouldn't waste my time applying for WA moose.  There are better options, that include hunting moose before you die of old age.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 10443
  • Location: The valley
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #61 on: May 19, 2017, 09:54:01 AM »
 :chuckle:

Offline huntnnw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 6754
  • Location: Spokane
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #62 on: May 22, 2017, 05:37:43 AM »
I wouldn't waste my time applying for WA moose.  There are better options, that include hunting moose before you die of old age.

 :yeah: pony up the money for ID.. You will be moose hunting in a few years

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 10443
  • Location: The valley
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #63 on: May 22, 2017, 05:40:21 AM »
Apply as you are not out much money if you do and you might end up being lucky

Offline Ridgeratt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2982
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #64 on: May 22, 2017, 06:01:01 AM »
Here are the 2016 stats. Some of the tags went to folks with 2 or 3 points.
It's a Lottery.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2016category_points_anymoose.pdf

Online jkononen

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 366
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley, Wa
Re: moose 10 pts or less?
« Reply #65 on: May 25, 2017, 02:01:22 PM »
Here are the 2016 stats. Some of the tags went to folks with 2 or 3 points.
It's a Lottery.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/points/2016category_points_anymoose.pdf
The 2 and 3 point winners for 49 degrees north we're a 10 year old and a 11 or 12 year old. Both from Skagit valley.
we live for the nights we never remember with the people we'll never forget

 

* Recent Topics

Interesting Cheytac 375 HAMR video by Alchase
[Today at 10:11:11 PM]


A better point system - no points by SteelheadTed
[Today at 10:02:35 PM]


Custom Shops in WA by carpsniperg2
[Today at 10:00:36 PM]


Lake Washington Sockeye by huntnphool
[Today at 09:58:10 PM]


Hey KFhunter by KFhunter
[Today at 09:52:02 PM]


Bear size by carpsniperg2
[Today at 09:51:50 PM]


blue ridge hunting ranch by str8meat
[Today at 09:50:18 PM]


Great Job WDFW by jackelope
[Today at 09:35:41 PM]


Black smithing by carpsniperg2
[Today at 09:31:01 PM]


The Lake and the Butte by Romulus1297
[Today at 09:25:08 PM]


new to inlines by lhrbull
[Today at 09:24:34 PM]


Best Dad by Blacklab
[Today at 09:23:15 PM]


Is this forum "food" for anti-hunters? by konradcountry
[Today at 09:12:39 PM]


Snake River Steelhead (trout) changes? Thoughts? by gaddy
[Today at 09:07:37 PM]


Wtb: Columbia river anchor system by 95powersmoker
[Today at 09:04:07 PM]


Who's essentric rig is this? by kodiak 907
[Today at 08:27:37 PM]


The long range cold bore shot project by timberghost72
[Today at 08:15:40 PM]


Little Tiffany Lake by FS38
[Today at 08:12:02 PM]


Sammy Hagar tickets by elkaholic123
[Today at 08:10:50 PM]


never thought I would see it, Sturgeon is open upper columbia! by PA BEN
[Today at 07:58:35 PM]