collapse
A Hunting Trip of a lifetime in the Wenaha Tucannon Wilderness! Order Jason Phelps Calls Here

Author Topic: Another elk poaching case  (Read 898 times)

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4216
  • Location: Chewelah
Another elk poaching case
« on: May 09, 2017, 08:00:14 PM »

Offline dreamunelk

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1791
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2017, 08:26:43 PM »
2014 - Old news

Agree makes one wonder.

I also wonder how many people no these types of crimes can be a limiting factor for a GMU.  The additive harvest can really hurt populations.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 4272
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2017, 10:18:27 AM »
My knowledge is dated but there were quite a few studies 1970s-1990s which looked at big game poaching rates, detection rates, and conviction rates.  Around the country, poaching (defined as illegal harvest) ranged from less than 50% to more than 100% of legal harvest.  Detection rates (not arrests or identification of suspects, just detection that a crime was likely committed) ranged from 1% to 10%.  Conviction rates as a percentage of poaching was less than 1%. 

My guess is that with incentives (e.g., points and cash rewards), an increasingly urbanized population and cell phones that poaching rates may have declined and detection and conviction rates increased nationally.  Where there is tribal hunting I suspect detection rates are low, as it is difficult to determine whether an animal was poached out of season or is a legal tribal harvest.

Poaching is definitely a limiting factor when it comes to legal hunting, costing legal hunters both opportunity and harvest.  Shorter seasons, smaller bag limits, worse season timing are all means of compensating for poaching losses when legal + illegal harvest is a limiting factor for populations.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 

ElkNut Outdoor Productions

* Recent Topics

Raccoon Trapping by hunter399
[Today at 01:14:22 AM]


Seattle Mariners (2017) by csaaphill
[Today at 12:36:19 AM]


Canned 'Possum by Humptulips
[Today at 12:03:27 AM]


Who's essentric rig is this? by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 11:59:25 PM]


Should the WA special draw POINTS system be done away with (POLL) by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 11:57:08 PM]


DOJ's McKittrick Endangered Species Act Policy Thrown Out by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 11:47:05 PM]


chainsaw sharpening by j_h_nimrod
[Yesterday at 11:40:17 PM]


Best muzzle loader bullet for elk? by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 11:15:17 PM]


Walleye rigs by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 11:05:25 PM]


Awesome Abuse Test on Hi Point by b23
[Yesterday at 10:49:38 PM]


WTB: Dryer by robodad
[Yesterday at 10:49:04 PM]


Edmonton beaver attacks prompt warning from Alberta trapper by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:21:33 PM]


Wts: howa 1500 6.5 creedmoor by wendigo
[Yesterday at 10:14:04 PM]


Wyoming unit 034-1 by fisker
[Yesterday at 10:02:07 PM]


SE Washington River Cabins by emac
[Yesterday at 09:59:20 PM]


FS Road 22 wobbly lake trail by Bowflinger
[Yesterday at 09:58:05 PM]


Crawdad Mania - 2017 by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 09:55:29 PM]


For Sale - Leica rangemaster crf 1000-r $415 by Rb1
[Yesterday at 09:52:31 PM]


WTS: Mystery Ranch Pintler New With Tags by johns8168
[Yesterday at 09:44:30 PM]


Seattle’s Gun Tax Backfires: Gun related deaths double by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 09:41:33 PM]