collapse
A Hunting Trip of a lifetime in the Wenaha Tucannon Wilderness! Extreme Elk Magazine

Author Topic: Another elk poaching case  (Read 1245 times)

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4273
  • Location: Chewelah
Another elk poaching case
« on: May 09, 2017, 08:00:14 PM »

Online dreamunelk

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2017, 08:26:43 PM »
2014 - Old news

Agree makes one wonder.

I also wonder how many people no these types of crimes can be a limiting factor for a GMU.  The additive harvest can really hurt populations.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 4499
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Another elk poaching case
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2017, 10:18:27 AM »
My knowledge is dated but there were quite a few studies 1970s-1990s which looked at big game poaching rates, detection rates, and conviction rates.  Around the country, poaching (defined as illegal harvest) ranged from less than 50% to more than 100% of legal harvest.  Detection rates (not arrests or identification of suspects, just detection that a crime was likely committed) ranged from 1% to 10%.  Conviction rates as a percentage of poaching was less than 1%. 

My guess is that with incentives (e.g., points and cash rewards), an increasingly urbanized population and cell phones that poaching rates may have declined and detection and conviction rates increased nationally.  Where there is tribal hunting I suspect detection rates are low, as it is difficult to determine whether an animal was poached out of season or is a legal tribal harvest.

Poaching is definitely a limiting factor when it comes to legal hunting, costing legal hunters both opportunity and harvest.  Shorter seasons, smaller bag limits, worse season timing are all means of compensating for poaching losses when legal + illegal harvest is a limiting factor for populations.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 

ElkNut Outdoor Productions

* Recent Topics

Wet optics while BT/Roosie hunting! by JakeLand
[Today at 10:54:01 AM]


Floorless in Western WA? by fillthefreezer
[Today at 10:38:06 AM]


WTS: AR Pistol by Gamehunter034
[Today at 10:28:36 AM]


Daily Bag Limit - Geese by hunt4life
[Today at 10:27:27 AM]


Son's first deer by wafisherman
[Today at 10:20:01 AM]


Rtspring and "E" have done it again! Buck down!!! Pics and story added.. by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:19:05 AM]


Manson by cougforester
[Today at 10:17:49 AM]


Great Idaho Bucks by huntnphool
[Today at 10:13:51 AM]


2017 Deer, post them here (photos & stats) by Brushbuster
[Today at 10:11:34 AM]


I failed as a uncle/mentor by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:58:32 AM]


Washington State Mule Deer Hunting Future (poll) by huntnphool
[Today at 09:56:03 AM]


Looking for Tundra, Bravo, Skandic or Bearcat sled... by boneaddict
[Today at 09:46:07 AM]


Does anyone actually rinse their deer with a hose after it has been skinned?WHY? by Mudman
[Today at 09:42:10 AM]


The Rich Outdoors (Blacktail podcast) by MrSmallington
[Today at 09:40:46 AM]


Firewood permit question by boneaddict
[Today at 09:38:46 AM]


2017 Youth First time kills by C-Money
[Today at 09:37:14 AM]


Blacktail Rut? by WSU
[Today at 09:26:26 AM]


Buck Down by C-Money
[Today at 09:26:04 AM]


Season is over too soon by Sitka_Blacktail
[Today at 09:09:26 AM]


30"? by boneaddict
[Today at 09:07:58 AM]