collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story  (Read 16194 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 8813
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #30 on: May 30, 2017, 07:12:54 PM »
I really don't blame the timber companies. Bears can easily damage 3% of the trees in a stand. add that up over 30 years and there is nothing left. Especially bad for a small land owner if a bear camps out on his land.
A guy I worked for at one time has 160 acres that abut FS land. Just off his land there is a big stump that bears den under. Every year a sow spends the winter there and when she comes out with cubs she pretty much lives off his trees. The damage has really taken a toll. He tried hound hunters but they would chase the bear back far enough to where they were required to quit it and the bear would practically beat them back after they rounded the dogs up. He killed one bear in 5 years.
Finally hired USDA to snare his land and they killed I think 5 the first year.
You can complain about the hound guys if you want but if they don't thin the bear out USDA is going to come in. I know most bear damage complaints in OR are taken care of by snaring. I know the guy that does a large percentage of it.

IMO the problem is not the hound guys or the land owners or WDFW for that matter. It is the law. Change the law and the problem gets fixed. The way it is WDFWs hands are tied.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 8
  • Location: Washington
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #31 on: June 08, 2017, 01:56:53 PM »
It isn't a loophole, as it is specifically written into the law. I am one of the hunters that targets these bears.  I don't use hounds, but I do spend hundreds of hours a year in the woods from April until the end of June. Also, I am acting as an agent of the state when I am out there.   The properties I assist with do not belong to large companies like WEYCO, Green Diamond, or Intl. Paper.  The properties I protect belong to small forest landowners, usually around 150-250 acres.  We also work very closely with WDFW conflict management specialists, as well as enforcement.  It isn't a willy nilly operation like Alison Morrow makes it out to be.  There is no pay for me for my time.  The landowners do not get reimbursed for damage like other AG producers, so it is all on us.

We are very good at what we do, it is all volunteer, and it is a *censored* ton of work.  I found damage on May 14th this year, and the next day we had that bear on the ground, 450 yards from the damage site.  When WDFW bios came to the kill site we opened the stomach and found cambium in its gut.

On one tree farm in May 2015 I found 45 trees damaged in a single day.  Left unchecked, the damage can be catastrophic to small forest land owners.  How much would 45 mature doug fir trees be worth?  How many board feet of timber is that?  Multiply that times 30-45 days of the peeling season, and the impact gets bigger, quickly.

Also remember that depredation hunting, taking out problem animals, is not meant to be a fair chase situation.  Do you want a problem cougar to be left to roam after picking off pets and livestock, or do you want it dealt with as immediately as possible?  It is a very targeted type of hunting meant to mitigate current or future damage.  Nothing more, nothing less.   

As to the bloodlust comments, well, I have an active bear on a property that has had significant damage in the past.  The thing is there has been no damage this year on this property.  In talking with the landowner the other day they asked about progress with the bear.  I told them that while there is a bear on the property, it is eating grass and other foods, and not peeling trees, so I didn't see a need to drop him.  They agreed.  If I run into him, it may be a bad day for him, but in the mean time I'll continue to check the property every other day, without pay, and see what my trail cameras reveal, and hope for no damage.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2017, 02:06:49 PM by dogfish »

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20873
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #32 on: June 08, 2017, 01:58:57 PM »
Pretty interesting stuff there fish. Nice to have you and thanks for the input

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 14482
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #33 on: June 08, 2017, 02:17:02 PM »
Pretty interesting stuff there fish. Nice to have you and thanks for the input
:yeah:
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 8
  • Location: Washington
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #34 on: June 08, 2017, 02:20:26 PM »
In addition to dealing with the depredation issues on these properties, we also act as gillies, watching over the properties while the landowner isn't there.  Over the Memorial Day weekend I had a pop-up blind, a set of shooting sticks, and a tripod chair stolen.  Did a little more exploring and found a lot of cascara trees that had been peeled.  Probably two separate issues, that just happened on the same day.  I had my cameras set for animals, not people, so I didn't get them on camera.  Added 6 more cameras, and guess what?  Caught someone up past three no trespassing signs and a gate, where they shouldn't be. 

Any ideas who this jeep belongs to? 
 

If you do, I, and WDFW enforcement, and the GHSO would like to talk to them.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20873
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #35 on: June 08, 2017, 02:22:19 PM »
Not good.

Please share some fatty bear pics if you got 'em!

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14351
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #36 on: June 08, 2017, 02:28:34 PM »
If WDFW and the sheriff want to talk to that guy, why not just run the plate on that jeep?

Offline dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 8
  • Location: Washington
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #37 on: June 08, 2017, 02:53:14 PM »
If WDFW and the sheriff want to talk to that guy, why not just run the plate on that jeep?

They are going to do that at some time, but they have limited time and manpower to go after property crimes.  If I had access to do so, I'd have done it already.  Property crimes are the lowest priority, and I don't blame them for prioritizing as such.  Also the picture isn't 100% clear, so there are at least 4 possibilities for the plate.  This would be someone who regularly travels in the Malone area, along the Mox-Chehalis Rd. 

 

Offline dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 8
  • Location: Washington
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #38 on: June 08, 2017, 02:55:59 PM »
Not good.

Please share some fatty bear pics if you got 'em!

I'll share some trail camera pics of the bears later.  Pics of harvested depredation bears are not shared.

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20873
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #39 on: June 08, 2017, 02:57:45 PM »
 :tup:

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 37051
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #40 on: June 08, 2017, 03:43:03 PM »
Thanks for the input dogfish! :tup:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline lord grizzly

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 789
  • Location: idaho
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #41 on: June 08, 2017, 06:08:22 PM »
You guys have "journalists" over there that spent a year of there life covering what we call spring bear season LOL

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #42 on: June 08, 2017, 07:24:12 PM »
You guys have "journalists" over there that spent a year of there life covering what we call spring bear season LOL

Careful - the disease can spread to other states.  Spent a week in Idaho recently for work.  Kind of surprising the number of libs I met.

Offline lord grizzly

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 789
  • Location: idaho
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #43 on: June 08, 2017, 07:44:31 PM »
You guys have "journalists" over there that spent a year of there life covering what we call spring bear season LOL

Careful - the disease can spread to other states.  Spent a week in Idaho recently for work.  Kind of surprising the number of libs I met.

I'm not real worried

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Loophole allows "illegal" bear hunt with dogs--King 5 Story
« Reply #44 on: June 08, 2017, 07:46:38 PM »
You guys have "journalists" over there that spent a year of there life covering what we call spring bear season LOL

Careful - the disease can spread to other states.  Spent a week in Idaho recently for work.  Kind of surprising the number of libs I met.

I'm not real worried

Neither were we!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by Machias
[Today at 09:19:44 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Walked a cougar down by 2MANY
[Today at 08:56:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:22:11 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal