collapse

Author Topic: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA  (Read 380 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3876
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Kit Carson

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 896
  • Location: Snohomish County
  • Groups: NRA, WSTA, NTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2017, 09:41:36 PM »
That is scary.
It seems like it's solely on the basis of license fees not covering the overall expense of regulating statewide trapping...

Are there any states where the license fees do in fact cover the overall total costs of regulation? If that is a way the Antis can wipe out trapping then what is going to keep us able to legally trap?  :yike:

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3876
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2017, 10:25:04 PM »
I cannot imagine how they could ever come up with a figure for the cost of managing trapping that would legitimately show it cost more then licenses brought in.
I know in this State the Furbearer section manager only spends part of her time on trapping and the majority on her other job which is large carnivores. Probably spend less time then that in CA. No CITES tagging in CA so no expense there. What does that leave? Compiling the reports of catch and season setting is all I can come up with. Bet that could do it all in a day.
Maybe what they need to do is stop trying to manage furbearers, no license needed. With the price of fur I doubt they would ever over harvest.

I wonder if anyone would consider eliminating all government programs that lose money.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Kit Carson

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 896
  • Location: Snohomish County
  • Groups: NRA, WSTA, NTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2017, 11:12:40 PM »
Thank you Bruce. Still a little scary though

Offline UrbanTrapper

  • Life Member: NRA, SCI, NTA, WSTA
  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 229
  • Location: Seattle or Kittitas County
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, WWC, HHC, NTA, WSTA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2017, 01:02:49 AM »
Bruce, Are you saying you think the lawsuit WILL fail?

Offline SGTDuffman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 232
  • Location: Washington
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2017, 05:13:14 AM »
I'd say the comments in that news link are scary, but that's about what I'd expect from a mentally ill morally defunct liberal Mecca like California. Not a trace of common sense to be found anywhere, just breathless proclaimations that hunters and trappers are bloodthirsty murders who are trying to extinct as many species as possible. These people have absolutely no clue what conservation is, and I'd bet that not one of them has ever opened their wallet to fund anything that fiscally supports conservation or enforcement.

Offline G-S

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 56
  • Location: Lewiston Id
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2017, 07:33:47 AM »
 :yeah:

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3876
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Lawsuit to end trapping in CA
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2017, 01:25:13 PM »
Bruce, Are you saying you think the lawsuit WILL fail?

If I had to predict what would happen I would guess it will never get to court.
Governor Brown has packed the F&W Commission with animal rights types. They will probably just close the season on furbearers except for depredation work to avoid defending against the suit in court.
Bruce Vandervort

 

* Recent Topics

First bear ever - BIG boar down! by robodad
[Today at 10:57:36 PM]


Golden Retriever Puppies by lokidog
[Today at 10:55:39 PM]


Multiple AR uppers 5.56, 6x45 and 270 AR by jpharcher
[Today at 10:49:10 PM]


PUPPIES! Our Golden Retriever Amber by lokidog
[Today at 10:45:20 PM]


Dayton-Marengo by Maverick
[Today at 10:34:38 PM]


Multi season permits, good or bad? by PolarBear
[Today at 10:11:57 PM]


2017 Deer, post them here (photos & stats) by chuckster
[Today at 10:11:16 PM]


BIG BUCK UP!!! by PastorJoel
[Today at 10:08:16 PM]


Wife's opening day Mulie by Calvin Rayborn
[Today at 09:58:23 PM]


Popular place by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 09:54:57 PM]


Jolly mtn fire, Teanaway GMU 335 by slowhand
[Today at 09:50:33 PM]


Well, this is gonna be different..... by fishnfur
[Today at 09:47:19 PM]


FS:Beeman SK X2 Dual Caliber Air Rifle(NEW) by Tiger1358
[Today at 09:47:16 PM]


Who you look'un at? by Elkcollector82
[Today at 09:38:48 PM]


wtb knight bighorn 50 cal. rifle by Lefty315
[Today at 09:21:45 PM]


Help with youth hunt preferably in Skok Unit. by pd
[Today at 09:13:18 PM]


Pictures in personal message? by RB
[Today at 09:06:47 PM]


jennabug's first deer story by ELKBURGER
[Today at 09:02:05 PM]


1999 22ft. Dutchman travel trailer by Salmonmoocher12
[Today at 08:57:51 PM]


2017 Bears by csaaphill
[Today at 08:51:56 PM]