collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills  (Read 3525 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 8812
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Axle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2088
  • Location: Issaquah
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2017, 06:39:08 PM »
Quote
His findings contradict those of agents from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The agency attributed the deaths of six cattle to “other” causes but specifically ruled out wolves. As a result, Butler isn’t eligible for compensation from a special state fund set up for ranchers.
“The fact the two reports come to different conclusions is frustrating,” said Sheriff Brian Wolfe. “The sheriff’s office has staff that are educated in this area and continue to receive ongoing training.”

Funny how that works.
Let me guess - the folks in the sheriff's office are hunters but the folks in the wildlife department are not.
I am the man what runs with the football: Jerry Clower

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1120
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2017, 06:59:15 PM »
Sniff, sniff...smells like rotten wolf kill to me.

Other causes? That interesting...I wonder how many other cases of both domestic and wild ungulates are mislabeled as dying from "other causes" and not "predators killed them" or "predators were trying to kill them and they died of exhaustion", or "predators were trying to kill them and they got tangled up in barbed wire fencing", etc.

I mean, if you were an unscrupulous wolf-hugging Department employee and wanted to gerrymander some statistics, then this seems like a perfectly valid way to hide the predator problem and forestall the inevitable solution.

Also...explain to me why in the hell are we paying Federal authorities to show up and NOT write a report?

I'm siding with the Malheur Sheriff's Dept.

 
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline Axle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2088
  • Location: Issaquah
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2017, 07:03:05 PM »
Quote
Also...explain to me why in the hell are we paying Federal authorities to show up and NOT write a report?

Because they are simply in it for a paycheck and a fat retirement plan.
I am the man what runs with the football: Jerry Clower

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9112
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2017, 09:19:10 PM »
Welcome to the fraud and corruption of the wolf introduction which seems to travel with the wolves from state to state.


Sounds like ODFG are being coached by WDF&Wolves, I was called to help secure a calf kill a few years ago on a near ranch. We found a cow that was very protective and a dead calf, we back trailed to where the calf was first attack and found a big pile of wolf scat. We both figured this for sure would be a confirmed wolf kill. But the famed fitkin showed up and after a few hours he said he had found a coyote track. So it was labeled as a coyote kill.

Sounds like those ranchers in Oregon need to take care of their predation problems without contacting state or federal agencies, just like many of the WA ranchers have learned, it's either that or continue to feed USFWS wolves.


Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42821
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2017, 07:38:49 AM »
Quote
His findings contradict those of agents from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The agency attributed the deaths of six cattle to “other” causes but specifically ruled out wolves. As a result, Butler isn’t eligible for compensation from a special state fund set up for ranchers.
“The fact the two reports come to different conclusions is frustrating,” said Sheriff Brian Wolfe. “The sheriff’s office has staff that are educated in this area and continue to receive ongoing training.”

Funny how that works.
Let me guess - the folks in the sheriff's office are hunters but the folks in the wildlife department are not.

The Sheriff's department are locals and give a darn about their community and residents. That's why sheriffs are elected and the highest LE authority in their jurisdiction.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9112
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2017, 07:44:53 AM »
Quote
His findings contradict those of agents from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. The agency attributed the deaths of six cattle to “other” causes but specifically ruled out wolves. As a result, Butler isn’t eligible for compensation from a special state fund set up for ranchers.
“The fact the two reports come to different conclusions is frustrating,” said Sheriff Brian Wolfe. “The sheriff’s office has staff that are educated in this area and continue to receive ongoing training.”

Funny how that works.
Let me guess - the folks in the sheriff's office are hunters but the folks in the wildlife department are not.

The Sheriff's department are locals and give a darn about their community and residents. That's why sheriffs are elected and the highest LE authority in their jurisdiction.



 :tup:

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2017, 08:03:13 AM »
After what happened in that county you think the sherif is going  do anything other than side with a local?  Could be Dangerious country for Feds and state folks... not exactly any love or trust.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42821
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2017, 08:18:46 AM »
After what happened in that county you think the sherif is going  do anything other than side with a local?  Could be Dangerious country for Feds and state folks... not exactly any love or trust.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The sheriff can also un-deputize the state and federal LE operating in that county, effectively barring them from arresting anyone. My understanding is that they (the state and feds), could still investigate but would be required to work with the sheriff to act on warrants. I'm often impressed with the way county sheriffs protect and uphold their constituents' rights. When the last gun control in was passed in WA and OR for the background checks, several said they wouldn't enforce the law.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3318
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2017, 08:45:42 AM »
It seems a DNA test could clear this up.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10277
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2017, 08:51:42 AM »
After what happened in that county you think the sherif is going  do anything other than side with a local?  Could be Dangerious country for Feds and state folks... not exactly any love or trust.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The sheriff can also un-deputize the state and federal LE operating in that county, effectively barring them from arresting anyone. My understanding is that they (the state and feds), could still investigate but would be required to work with the sheriff to act on warrants. I'm often impressed with the way county sheriffs protect and uphold their constituents' rights. When the last gun control in was passed in WA and OR for the background checks, several said they wouldn't enforce the law.
Most feds aren't deputized. Typically the only ones who are are patrol feds (Forest Service, Park Service, Fed Protective Service, etc.). The only thing a county deputization does is allow the feds to make state arrests into state courts. If they don't have that then they can only make federal arrests into federal court.

In Oregon, federal officers are essentially deputized by the state. Any federal officer can fill out a form and can arrest anyone in Oregon committing any state misdemeanor or felony, regardless of what the Sheriff says, that's written into state code. In WA that Officer would need to be deputized.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42821
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2017, 08:54:30 AM »
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know OR was different. OR sucks!
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline olyguy79

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 321
  • Location: Thurston
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2017, 08:55:31 AM »
After what happened in that county you think the sherif is going  do anything other than side with a local?  Could be Dangerious country for Feds and state folks... not exactly any love or trust.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
The sheriff can also un-deputize the state and federal LE operating in that county, effectively barring them from arresting anyone. My understanding is that they (the state and feds), could still investigate but would be required to work with the sheriff to act on warrants. I'm often impressed with the way county sheriffs protect and uphold their constituents' rights. When the last gun control in was passed in WA and OR for the background checks, several said they wouldn't enforce the law.
Most feds aren't deputized. Typically the only ones who are are patrol feds (Forest Service, Park Service, Fed Protective Service, etc.). The only thing a county deputization does is allow the feds to make state arrests into state courts. If they don't have that then they can only make federal arrests into federal court.

In Oregon, federal officers are essentially deputized by the state. Any federal officer can fill out a form and can arrest anyone in Oregon committing any state misdemeanor or felony, regardless of what the Sheriff says, that's written into state code. In WA that Officer would need to be deputized.
:yeah:
Your three letter federal agencies (FBI, DEA, ATF) rarely seek county deputization because there's really no point, they're mainly working federal cases. The federal patrol agencies deal with more everyday police work (DUI, minor drug possession, wildlife, etc) and those cases are better handled in state courts, in WA the officer needs to be deputized by the Sheriff/City/State agency to process the case in state court. In Oregon the authority is granted via state law. Realistically, you see city/county officers seeking deputization from the FBI/DEA/ATF for task force work, and you see federal patrol officer seek county deputization for normal patrol work.

Offline olyguy79

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 321
  • Location: Thurston
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2017, 08:58:45 AM »
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know OR was different. OR sucks!
You'd actually be surprised the level of cooperation between feds and county sheriffs. There's a few "anti-federal sheriffs" in WA who deputize officers from federal agencies. You have to remember these people are politicians, they know what to say in order to get them elected. Plus, a county deputized USFS LEO for example now has more ability to help out deputies then he could if he wasn't deputized.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10277
Re: Sherriff and ODFW disagree on wolf kills
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2017, 09:05:39 AM »
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know OR was different. OR sucks!
Realistically it's more like WA is different than most states. Many states have some type of emergency type situation written into their laws. So if an FBI agent is driving by and someone is getting their head beaten in by a bat they can go over and arrest the suspect and charge them into state court. They couldn't go out pulling over people for expired registration. Some say well what about citizens arrest, most (if not all) agencies prohibit their personnel from exercising citizens arrest because of liability issues.

However, in WA both situations (head beaten in by bat and vehicle stop for expired registration) would require some type of deputization from the PD/Sheriff.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:31:08 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:43:51 PM]


Walked a cougar down by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:31:53 PM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]


WTS Suppressors I Can Get by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:30:33 PM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by Longfield1
[Yesterday at 03:27:51 PM]


Straight on by kentrek
[Yesterday at 03:04:53 PM]


2024-2026 Hunting Season Proposals by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal