Free: Contests & Raffles.
To their credit, WDFW has been trying to protect ranchers who have been already financially hurt by wolf damage from being flooded with death threats.
A bit more detail, including some of my perspectives, in this one: http://nwsportsmanmag.com/another-ferry-co-wolf-depredation-another-cbd-lawsuit/As for protecting the ranchers' identities, particularly in the case of the ranchhands who lawfully shot wolves caught-in-the-act of attacking cattle, thankfully WDFW has a slightly stronger legal shield to do so after last session: http://www.capitalpress.com/Washington/20170410/washington-lawmakers-seek-to-shield-wolf-plagued-ranchers-from-threats For background, Sen. Short and Rep. Kretz, hunting and ranching groups, and the more pragmatic conservation groups on the WAG supported HB 1465 as appropriate and necessary. It was opposed by the hardline groups who do not have a seat on the WAG, including those now suing WDFW. This case could end up being a test, though it's not specifically focused on that legislation.Government transparency is important, but so is protecting law-abiding citizens and important wildlife stakeholders from out-of-state trolls and uncompromising extremists.