collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Salmon fishing/Not likley  (Read 10464 times)

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 7989
  • Location: kitsap
Salmon fishing/Not likley
« on: December 13, 2017, 07:23:12 AM »
If you wana get really pissed off this am read the article on king 5 about the secret meetings between wdfw and the tribe's...

And people wonder why we distrust the state so much and see the tribe's as resource killers.

I can't post a link from my phn....


Online Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12050
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42826
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2017, 07:45:31 AM »
Wow, the WDFW really made an end run around the people who pay their bills. This is ridiculous.  :bash:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Online Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12050
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2017, 07:50:08 AM »
Wow, the WDFW really made an end run around the people who pay their bills. This is ridiculous.  :bash:
But not surprising.
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline Smokeploe

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 226
  • Location: Ethel
  • Groups: FTE, shooterforum
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2017, 08:12:15 AM »
How come the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife is following the state law concerning open meetings?  Are they exempt from following state laws? 
Smokeploe

When guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns!
The same with ammo!
The same with personal liberties

Offline Whitpirate

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2005
  • Location: Duvall, by way of Spokane/Metaline Falls
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2017, 08:32:00 AM »
Habitat loss and nets can't belong in the same sentence.  Of course the tribes are reducing their fishing days to compensate correct?  I may as well sell my boat.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 42826
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • Apply for a loan
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2017, 08:58:02 AM »
Wow, the WDFW really made an end run around the people who pay their bills. This is ridiculous.  :bash:
But not surprising.

Nope, unfortunately it's not. Having been shut out of a Spokane WAG meeting, it doesn't surprise me at all.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2017, 09:53:14 AM »
Wow, the WDFW really made an end run around the people who pay their bills. This is ridiculous.  :bash:
But not surprising.
There is an amazing disconnect. Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised that they can't connect the dots enough to see why they exist.
What reason do we need the WDFW if they arnt interested in sportsmen... one would think a merger of them and parks would and welcomed not fought...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2848
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2017, 09:54:50 AM »
 >:(
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Online Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12050
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2017, 10:01:19 AM »
Wow, the WDFW really made an end run around the people who pay their bills. This is ridiculous.  :bash:
But not surprising.
There is an amazing disconnect. Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised that they can't connect the dots enough to see why they exist.
What reason do we need the WDFW if they arnt interested in sportsmen... one would think a merger of them and parks would and welcomed not fought...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
As near as I can tell, it at least appears that all they are interested in doing is justifying their payroll.
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14351
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2017, 10:20:34 AM »
Habitat loss and nets can't belong in the same sentence.  Of course the tribes are reducing their fishing days to compensate correct?  I may as well sell my boat.
Yeah, it really grinds to see a few rivers with habitat greater than you can imagine.  And one can get netted six days a week and the fish are now listed as threatened.

Offline RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2838
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2017, 10:34:43 AM »
Do the Feds have any jurisdiction over the tribes due to the Kings being on the ESA list? I know the state can't do anything due to treaty rights, just a question, not a trolling comment to inflame anyone.  :twocents:
IAFF #3728

Offline cavemann

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 1076
  • Location: Washington
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2017, 05:44:08 PM »
I'll wait to see what the outcome is, but I'm not holding my breath for a positive one.  Everyone collectively agrees the WDFW is worthy of plenty of criticism and takes it fair share of jabs.  I agree they should and they have more than made their own beds.  It is stuff like this that also feeds into the narrative against the tribes.  I'm tired of the vale of secrecy and sovereignty they hide behind.  If they are going to accept partnerships with WDFW on NOA application and co-management of shared resources they need to show some transparency and good faith to the general public.  The explanation of the treaty's and Boldt decision is tiresome also.  Things adapt, change and require adjustment.  All most of us are asking of the tribes is to be a little more forthcoming and transparent if they also want us to not assume the worst and be frustrated.  If they don't care about the frustrations and public image it shows, by all means carry on.  But to continue to decry any of us who are frustrated with the secret meetings and lack of transparency on harvest numbers, is hypocritical and insulting.  If you want a conversation, HAVE ONE IN PUBLIC!!!!

Offline hunthard

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 532
  • Location: western wa
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2017, 12:02:24 AM »
I think they don't want a conversation.

Online steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1602
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: Salmon fishing/Not likley
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2017, 12:25:41 AM »
Listen to the 710am Outdoor line podcast from last Saturday.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by xXLojackXx
[Today at 10:13:39 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by Machias
[Today at 09:19:44 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Walked a cougar down by 2MANY
[Today at 08:56:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:22:11 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal