collapse
GET THE MOST OUT OF YOUR GPS MAP Guided Moose And Black Bear Hunts

Author Topic: cougar population  (Read 2514 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 26261
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: cougar population
« Reply #15 on: December 26, 2017, 05:31:40 PM »
When did WDFW come out against any additional harvest methods?  I think if HSUS and PAWS were supportive we could get some hound pursuit back, the state (WDFW) is not the problem in that regard.

 I-655 is not under the control of HSUS and PAWS. It was voted on and passed by "the people" of Washington (King, Snohomish Counties).

 To get hound hunting back will require A LOT more than their support. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Limhangerslayer

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 721
  • Location: Dryside
Re: cougar population
« Reply #16 on: December 26, 2017, 05:49:22 PM »
Only 40% of CMAs that have quotas ever reach quota. I have proposed and have significant support for additional harvest methods to be allowed.
WDFW has came out against any additional harvest methods.
Are they really supportive of predator harvest? It doesn't seem so.

It might of came out wrong.  Most of the good units on the eastside do get filled.  Mainly because the quotas are ridiculously low.  I hunt on a ranch a lot here by my house that every year we are seeing more and more cats every year.  They just added the April season to make people feel warm and fuzzy but it doesn't do jack when a lot of the units close by the end of early season

Offline Calvin Rayborn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 941
  • Location: Columbia Basin
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, Amateur Trapshooting Association - Member
Re: cougar population
« Reply #17 on: December 26, 2017, 08:00:06 PM »
Enough to watch your back!

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4249
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: cougar population
« Reply #18 on: December 26, 2017, 10:24:35 PM »
Only 40% of CMAs that have quotas ever reach quota. I have proposed and have significant support for additional harvest methods to be allowed.
WDFW has came out against any additional harvest methods.
Are they really supportive of predator harvest? It doesn't seem so.

It might of came out wrong.  Most of the good units on the eastside do get filled.  Mainly because the quotas are ridiculously low.  I hunt on a ranch a lot here by my house that every year we are seeing more and more cats every year.  They just added the April season to make people feel warm and fuzzy but it doesn't do jack when a lot of the units close by the end of early season
I have no disagreement with anything you said. From looking at the stats on cougar kills it looks to me like areas that have snow, accessibility and have opener landscapes tend to have their quotas filled.
That doesn't mean there are less cougar elsewhere. It means boot hunting is not effective in 60% of the State. Why not let another user group have a try at those unharvested quotas? A season could be crafted to not take away from other user groups so it is hard to understand why the Department will not support it.
Well, I can guess. In a meeting when I was giving my sales pitch, afterwards I heard this comment " We'll see what the Humane Society thinks of it". Somehow I knew I was sunk when I heard that. 
Bruce Vandervort

Offline Blacktail Sniper

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4661
  • Location: Rochester, Washington
  • Kill'em all...let the gravy sort'em out!!!
Re: cougar population
« Reply #19 on: December 27, 2017, 12:56:46 AM »
When did WDFW come out against any additional harvest methods?  I think if HSUS and PAWS were supportive we could get some hound pursuit back, the state (WDFW) is not the problem in that regard.

 I-655 is not under the control of HSUS and PAWS. It was voted on and passed by "the people" of Washington (King, Snohomish Counties).

 To get hound hunting back will require A LOT more than their support. :twocents:

Never going to happen!

In 1996, nine counties out of the 39 in the state voted for keeping hounds & baiting, that means, in addition to the ones mentioned above, there were 28 other counties, statewide that voted to take hounds and baiting away.

https://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=&c=&c2=&t=&t2=&p=&p2=655&y=

Can click on the circled link in the picture to see the breakdown by county for those interested
It is better to be consistently incorrect than inconsistently correct...

Sarcasm: The ability to insult stupid people without them realizing it. 

My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity...

Sarcasm makes smart people laugh and stupid people mad.

Offline jasnt

  • Predator hunter
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 4341
  • Location: deer park
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: cougar population
« Reply #20 on: December 27, 2017, 11:37:17 AM »
Only 40% of CMAs that have quotas ever reach quota. I have proposed and have significant support for additional harvest methods to be allowed.
WDFW has came out against any additional harvest methods.
Are they really supportive of predator harvest? It doesn't seem so.

It might of came out wrong.  Most of the good units on the eastside do get filled.  Mainly because the quotas are ridiculously low.  I hunt on a ranch a lot here by my house that every year we are seeing more and more cats every year.  They just added the April season to make people feel warm and fuzzy but it doesn't do jack when a lot of the units close by the end of early season
I have no disagreement with anything you said. From looking at the stats on cougar kills it looks to me like areas that have snow, accessibility and have opener landscapes tend to have their quotas filled.
That doesn't mean there are less cougar elsewhere. It means boot hunting is not effective in 60% of the State. Why not let another user group have a try at those unharvested quotas? A season could be crafted to not take away from other user groups so it is hard to understand why the Department will not support it.
Well, I can guess. In a meeting when I was giving my sales pitch, afterwards I heard this comment " We'll see what the Humane Society thinks of it". Somehow I knew I was sunk when I heard that. 
that last part makes me sick!
🐾
Round ct. 262
"... we cannot change the fact that people will act in a certain way. We cannot change the inevitable. The only thing we can do is play on the one string we have, and that is our attitude. I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% of how I react to it. And so it is with you... we are in charge of our Attitudes."
Charles R. Swindoll

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17606
  • Location: Dayton or somewhere in the Blues.
  • "I'm bored play with me"
Re: cougar population
« Reply #21 on: December 27, 2017, 02:30:59 PM »
HSUS will NEVER support hunting their entire mission is to take all animal use and ownership out of the hands of humans.  They are very anti people. PAWS is not much better.

They will always work against hunting.

Sent from a deserted island

benchleg

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 18214
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: cougar population
« Reply #22 on: December 27, 2017, 03:44:20 PM »
Only 40% of CMAs that have quotas ever reach quota. I have proposed and have significant support for additional harvest methods to be allowed.
WDFW has came out against any additional harvest methods.
Are they really supportive of predator harvest? It doesn't seem so.

It might of came out wrong.  Most of the good units on the eastside do get filled.  Mainly because the quotas are ridiculously low.  I hunt on a ranch a lot here by my house that every year we are seeing more and more cats every year.  They just added the April season to make people feel warm and fuzzy but it doesn't do jack when a lot of the units close by the end of early season
I have no disagreement with anything you said. From looking at the stats on cougar kills it looks to me like areas that have snow, accessibility and have opener landscapes tend to have their quotas filled.
That doesn't mean there are less cougar elsewhere. It means boot hunting is not effective in 60% of the State. Why not let another user group have a try at those unharvested quotas? A season could be crafted to not take away from other user groups so it is hard to understand why the Department will not support it.
Well, I can guess. In a meeting when I was giving my sales pitch, afterwards I heard this comment " We'll see what the Humane Society thinks of it". Somehow I knew I was sunk when I heard that.
Do you think you could get one in a cage trap? Would you think it's like trapping a bobcat?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4249
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: cougar population
« Reply #23 on: December 27, 2017, 05:46:12 PM »
Only 40% of CMAs that have quotas ever reach quota. I have proposed and have significant support for additional harvest methods to be allowed.
WDFW has came out against any additional harvest methods.
Are they really supportive of predator harvest? It doesn't seem so.

It might of came out wrong.  Most of the good units on the eastside do get filled.  Mainly because the quotas are ridiculously low.  I hunt on a ranch a lot here by my house that every year we are seeing more and more cats every year.  They just added the April season to make people feel warm and fuzzy but it doesn't do jack when a lot of the units close by the end of early season
I have no disagreement with anything you said. From looking at the stats on cougar kills it looks to me like areas that have snow, accessibility and have opener landscapes tend to have their quotas filled.
That doesn't mean there are less cougar elsewhere. It means boot hunting is not effective in 60% of the State. Why not let another user group have a try at those unharvested quotas? A season could be crafted to not take away from other user groups so it is hard to understand why the Department will not support it.
Well, I can guess. In a meeting when I was giving my sales pitch, afterwards I heard this comment " We'll see what the Humane Society thinks of it". Somehow I knew I was sunk when I heard that.
Do you think you could get one in a cage trap? Would you think it's like trapping a bobcat?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
It is common to have them go in bobcat cages and steal the bait. All we need to trap them is the OK to do it and some bigger cages.
One member had a picture of a small one he caught in a bobcat cage 15x15x36. I don't know how the door managed to close.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline time2hunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 1039
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: cougar population
« Reply #24 on: December 27, 2017, 06:04:27 PM »
Easy and cheap to build.
http://www.livetraps.com/live-traps/cougar-traps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Local 3482

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 4249
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: cougar population
« Reply #25 on: December 27, 2017, 06:32:49 PM »
Easy and cheap to build.
http://www.livetraps.com/live-traps/cougar-traps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It would not take that big of a trap.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 26261
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: cougar population
« Reply #26 on: December 27, 2017, 07:37:35 PM »
When did WDFW come out against any additional harvest methods?  I think if HSUS and PAWS were supportive we could get some hound pursuit back, the state (WDFW) is not the problem in that regard.

 I-655 is not under the control of HSUS and PAWS. It was voted on and passed by "the people" of Washington (King, Snohomish Counties).

 To get hound hunting back will require A LOT more than their support. :twocents:

Never going to happen!

In 1996, nine counties out of the 39 in the state voted for keeping hounds & baiting, that means, in addition to the ones mentioned above, there were 28 other counties, statewide that voted to take hounds and baiting away.

https://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/results_report.aspx?e=&c=&c2=&t=&t2=&p=&p2=655&y=

Can click on the circled link in the picture to see the breakdown by county for those interested

 My point exactly. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline lewy

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2084
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA NRA
Re: cougar population
« Reply #27 on: December 27, 2017, 08:22:17 PM »
I heard that there's a chance that we'll be cage trapping lions in the near future. I personally haven't been able to get off of lion sign this fall/winter regardless of where I've been. Also was involved in calling and killing a really big Tom this winter, there is to many around :twocents:
Go hawks

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1156
  • Location: Bremerton, WA
  • Hunt anywhere, anytime!
Re: cougar population
« Reply #28 on: December 27, 2017, 10:33:47 PM »
reading that list, it looks like every single county voted to ban it. Am I reading it wrong?

Offline hhack

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Seattle
Re: cougar population
« Reply #29 on: December 27, 2017, 11:04:16 PM »
If toms have such a massive range according to the state why canít we at least transfer quota from one gmu to the other. States gonna do it with halibut this year why not cougars.

 

* Recent Topics

Slick bag? by X-Force
[Today at 11:20:35 PM]


WTB 12ga over under by 762Armo
[Today at 11:18:57 PM]


New Mexico draw by Brushbuster
[Today at 11:07:20 PM]


Anyone prepare deer rawhide? by lokidog
[Today at 11:05:58 PM]


Multi-season points question by fishnfur
[Today at 10:44:50 PM]


3rd Annual Salmon For Soldiers by castie2504
[Today at 10:17:20 PM]


Archery Success by Rainier10
[Today at 09:55:05 PM]


Funding For Wolves by KFhunter
[Today at 09:36:24 PM]


338 375 ruger build by Goshawk
[Today at 09:18:18 PM]


Steamboat Rock State Park Fishing by RB
[Today at 09:04:53 PM]


2014 F150 Fuel Filter Replacement by elksnout
[Today at 09:04:31 PM]


Turkey season 2018 by northwesthunter84
[Today at 08:57:58 PM]


Electronic Muffs by northwesthunter84
[Today at 08:57:09 PM]


Hogue 700 long action stocks by Snakeriver
[Today at 08:50:34 PM]


209 powder by buck n rut
[Today at 08:37:10 PM]


A true dream season 2017 by Muleyslyr
[Today at 08:36:54 PM]


Fathead - Updated by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 08:28:43 PM]


Permit submittal by ctwiggs1
[Today at 08:27:54 PM]


Out of the points game by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 08:18:47 PM]


2018 Lunker Bass Roundup! by Timberstalker
[Today at 08:18:09 PM]