collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Winter blackmouth  (Read 6320 times)

Offline Skillet

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+42)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 5624
  • Location: Sitka, AK
Re: Winter blackmouth
« Reply #30 on: January 18, 2018, 02:48:44 PM »
Not surprising, and that mentality is not limited to WA.  The AK troll fleet got shut down right before the second king opener as an emergency conservation measure for the Taku and Chilkat rivers.  We left 31000+ treaty kings in the water to completely eliminate any chance of impacting the non-treaty kings from those rivers.

The net result of that draconian conservation measure?  An estimated 160 additional kings hit the gravel in those two rivers.  That's a helluva sacrifice to make for 160 fish.

The Canadians, upon hearing how many treaty kings AK was sacrificing to ensure escapement, quickly followed suit and also put their fleet on the beach...

 :lol4:

I crack myself up.  No, of course the Canadians didn't do that... They said "Thank you, dummies" and shifted a bunch of effort from inside waters  to outside waters to intercept this bonanza of fish we didn't take on their way south...

Why do I tell this story?
It will happen to the sport guys in Puget Sound, too.  Those Stilliguamish kings don't know boundaries, and I have no reason to believe they don't roam the entire Salish Sea at some point during their lives. I believe Canadian fisheries biology is years behind our own, and they seem to just react to whatever their neighbors are doing. So I anticipate the king fishing is going to be pretty darn good just north of the US / Canadian border for the next ten years... Courtesy of the Washington sport anglers.
KABOOM Count - 1

"The ocean is calling, and I must go."

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5380
Re: Winter blackmouth
« Reply #31 on: January 18, 2018, 02:56:19 PM »
It may end up cutting harvest to the north as well.  I know they are implementing a max exploitation rate.  It's obviously higher than the southern US rate but, in theory anyway, should also reduce harvest up north.  Perhaps AK and Canada should be up in arms over the deal brokered between the tribes, WA and NOAA?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:31:08 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:43:51 PM]


Walked a cougar down by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:31:53 PM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]


WTS Suppressors I Can Get by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:30:33 PM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by Longfield1
[Yesterday at 03:27:51 PM]


Straight on by kentrek
[Yesterday at 03:04:53 PM]


2024-2026 Hunting Season Proposals by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal