collapse

Author Topic: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails  (Read 3479 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #50 on: January 11, 2018, 11:44:27 PM »
That is a good question Sitka, and I agree with your take on it I don't see where we have different opinions on this.  We need to respect the rule of law, those ruled by it and especially those administering the law. 




I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 11146
  • Location: The valley
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #51 on: January 12, 2018, 05:20:33 AM »
As long as those that administer the law don't go above or beyond the law or have their own interpretation of the law.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42082
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #52 on: January 12, 2018, 07:15:58 AM »

Offline M_ray

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 3802
  • Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #53 on: January 12, 2018, 08:03:03 AM »
Compareing to water rights is apples to oranges. It would be a fair comparison if the Bundys werenít paying for the grazing rights and one day they walked in and said now you pay??? The Bundy family paid grazing rights from the 40ís to the 90ís and then stopped paying while thousands of other ranchers still pay. Try not paying your taxes for 20 years and then pull a gun on them when they knock on your door to collect, I donít think that would work out in your favor.

Yes there may have been mistakes made that resulted in his release. I wouldnít be ready to award him with an innocent commendation letís call it what it is, getting off on a technicality. Sorry I canít support law breakers.
I would happen to guess the reasoning for the fees in the 40s-70s was quite different than the 90s and today.

I would happen to guess there arnt all that many folks on here with extensive property right, and contract law.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Sounds like you are suggesting that when feeís increase we all should just stop paying them and hold a gun to their head when they come to collect?  :dunno: this is a strange logic, sorry but they are crooks and deadbeats. What makes them better than all others that paid their bills?
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...


MB

Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!

Offline idahohuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2347
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #54 on: January 12, 2018, 08:57:32 AM »
For the folks saying this was all about the government pushing them off the land...why does the government owe anyone entitlement forever to use public resources as they see fit?  Times change.  With various environmental laws put in place over the years there are a whole bunch of things you can't do anymore, and while these laws are far from perfect, they do ensure protection of our public resources.  Fact is private use of public lands needs to be closely regulated or we won't have much for public lands or resources with the 300 million plus people who live in this country. If an agency following the law determines grazing is not a compatible land use (as was the case here)...get your cows off the public lands. 

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #55 on: January 12, 2018, 09:03:22 AM »
For the folks saying this was all about the government pushing them off the land...why does the government owe anyone entitlement forever to use public resources as they see fit?  Times change.  With various environmental laws put in place over the years there are a whole bunch of things you can't do anymore, and while these laws are far from perfect, they do ensure protection of our public resources.  Fact is private use of public lands needs to be closely regulated or we won't have much for public lands or resources with the 300 million plus people who live in this country. If an agency following the law determines grazing is not a compatible land use (as was the case here)...get your cows off the public lands.

You'd rather see a sea of solar farms than a few cows?  Or you'd rather see an open pit uranium mine?

Hey I'm all for public benefit projects but I'm not convinced that a bunch of solar farms has a public benefit when it's shown that they are a poor investment.  I think it was more about kick backs and personal benefit for Harry Reid and the mobsters in Vegas.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-reid-solar/u-s-senator-reid-son-combine-for-china-firms-desert-plant-idUSBRE87U06D20120831
I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Offline idahohuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2347
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #56 on: January 12, 2018, 10:24:26 AM »
For the folks saying this was all about the government pushing them off the land...why does the government owe anyone entitlement forever to use public resources as they see fit?  Times change.  With various environmental laws put in place over the years there are a whole bunch of things you can't do anymore, and while these laws are far from perfect, they do ensure protection of our public resources.  Fact is private use of public lands needs to be closely regulated or we won't have much for public lands or resources with the 300 million plus people who live in this country. If an agency following the law determines grazing is not a compatible land use (as was the case here)...get your cows off the public lands.

You'd rather see a sea of solar farms than a few cows?  Or you'd rather see an open pit uranium mine?

Hey I'm all for public benefit projects but I'm not convinced that a bunch of solar farms has a public benefit when it's shown that they are a poor investment.  I think it was more about kick backs and personal benefit for Harry Reid and the mobsters in Vegas.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-reid-solar/u-s-senator-reid-son-combine-for-china-firms-desert-plant-idUSBRE87U06D20120831
Any use of federal lands should be subject to review and compliance with existing federal law...cows, solar farms, mines etc.

The article you cite does not indicate the solar farm would be on federal lands...which is a key point.  Many Bundy supporters have conflated what actually went on (illegal use of federal lands by a private citizen) with any use of any lands.  If Clark County wants to sell 9,000 acres to a Chinese firm of crooked Hillary's bla bla bla...that's not applicable to Bundy. The people of Clark County can weigh in on how their county manages its lands. 

Are there any reputable sources indicating BLM was going to allow private development (solar farms, Uranium mines, etc?) on the federal land Bundy's cows were trespassing?   

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline cavemann

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 190
  • Location: Washington
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #57 on: January 12, 2018, 10:31:40 AM »
I'll say this..  Isn't this were it starts??  Bundy's actions, right or wrong were directed at getting a message out.  As of today we are still talking about it and I for one have learned a ton about public lands, federal vs public, uranium, water rights, grazing rights, management and why foreign investors would be tied to some swath of land in the middle of no where.  They got the conversation going..  We can continue to debate how that all went down or focus on paying more attention to what is happening..  Like someone already mentioned, water rights in our state.  It has made me start to pay more attention and point people in the direction of reading and seeing it as well..  Awareness is much more important than persuasion.

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #58 on: January 12, 2018, 11:06:09 AM »
For the folks saying this was all about the government pushing them off the land...why does the government owe anyone entitlement forever to use public resources as they see fit?  Times change.  With various environmental laws put in place over the years there are a whole bunch of things you can't do anymore, and while these laws are far from perfect, they do ensure protection of our public resources.  Fact is private use of public lands needs to be closely regulated or we won't have much for public lands or resources with the 300 million plus people who live in this country. If an agency following the law determines grazing is not a compatible land use (as was the case here)...get your cows off the public lands.

You'd rather see a sea of solar farms than a few cows?  Or you'd rather see an open pit uranium mine?

Hey I'm all for public benefit projects but I'm not convinced that a bunch of solar farms has a public benefit when it's shown that they are a poor investment.  I think it was more about kick backs and personal benefit for Harry Reid and the mobsters in Vegas.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-reid-solar/u-s-senator-reid-son-combine-for-china-firms-desert-plant-idUSBRE87U06D20120831
Any use of federal lands should be subject to review and compliance with existing federal law...cows, solar farms, mines etc.

The article you cite does not indicate the solar farm would be on federal lands...which is a key point.  Many Bundy supporters have conflated what actually went on (illegal use of federal lands by a private citizen) with any use of any lands.  If Clark County wants to sell 9,000 acres to a Chinese firm of crooked Hillary's bla bla bla...that's not applicable to Bundy. The people of Clark County can weigh in on how their county manages its lands. 

Are there any reputable sources indicating BLM was going to allow private development (solar farms, Uranium mines, etc?) on the federal land Bundy's cows were trespassing?

You can go to off topics, click on any of the bundy threads there and find all the "proof" you want  :chuckle:     lotta proof there!

I'm not getting into the weeds here, if there was a conspiracy to drive the bundy's off the range they're not going to document their fraud, it's all speculation and what you want to believe.

I know you don't like cows on public lands, we've went round and round and round on that.  I'm not going to change your mind, and you aren't going to change mine on that.   

I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 17409
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #59 on: January 12, 2018, 11:36:54 AM »
I think KF& Sitkas statements are on point.

Should people quit paying fees rent what have you because they disagree? No.  It should be obvious to many that many agencies have been weaponized  for political purposes. It's not an R vs D thing it's a control issue.

Perhaps I've done a poor job at explaining myself. The reason WHY I think this case is important and interesting from a law/contract/property rights issue is because of the lenght of time the Bundy family has been ranching that land.  Think of the kinds of issues we discuss on here about tribal rights. They highlight the kinds of problems  that are incured with a right or contract between 2 parties that do not end or have some kind of sunset clause in them. There arnt that many businesses that have out lasted the increases in regulation. The Bundies are one of a few.

This issue with the Bundies, right or wrong, has the potential to open a big can of worms. It is why I think the ESA has been used as a weapon so often, and I also belive it could be part of the reason why shady/ illegal stuff has been done.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline farmin4u_98948

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 990
  • Location: Cliffdell
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #60 on: January 12, 2018, 08:06:10 PM »
SUMMARY. Where is the middle ground. This is where the story should go but it never does. Bundyís Are at one extreme which at one time was the norm. The federal government has moved the line way way to the opposite side. Will it come to a common center.  Of course not. The rules are made where one size fits all and we know that never works. At least the Bundys pushed back.
Just because you believe something is true doesn't mean that it is true!

Offline HUNTINCOUPLE

  • Lost Somewhere on the Praire of Klickitat Co. Chasing The Elusive BENCHLEG DEERS.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 6653
  • Location: Lyle WA, 98635
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #61 on: January 12, 2018, 08:12:48 PM »
SUMMARY. Where is the middle ground. This is where the story should go but it never does. Bundyís Are at one extreme which at one time was the norm. The federal government has moved the line way way to the opposite side. Will it come to a common center.  Of course not. The rules are made where one size fits all and we know that never works. At least the Bundys pushed back.

 :yeah:
Slap some bacon on a biscut and lets go, were burrnin daylight!

Most peoples health is a decision not a condition?

Kill your television!  ICEMAN SAID TO!

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #62 on: January 12, 2018, 08:24:21 PM »
the Mueller thing has really tainted congressional investigations, but this is a good purpose for that.   I wouldn't mind seeing a real investigation by congress through a joint committee, get to the bottom of this.  Might as well wait for a stiff wind, and pee in it  :(
I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Offline M_ray

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 3802
  • Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #63 on: January 13, 2018, 12:03:58 PM »
I think KF& Sitkas statements are on point.

Should people quit paying fees rent what have you because they disagree? No.  It should be obvious to many that many agencies have been weaponized  for political purposes. It's not an R vs D thing it's a control issue.

Perhaps I've done a poor job at explaining myself. The reason WHY I think this case is important and interesting from a law/contract/property rights issue is because of the lenght of time the Bundy family has been ranching that land.  Think of the kinds of issues we discuss on here about tribal rights. They highlight the kinds of problems  that are incured with a right or contract between 2 parties that do not end or have some kind of sunset clause in them. There arnt that many businesses that have out lasted the increases in regulation. The Bundies are one of a few.

This issue with the Bundies, right or wrong, has the potential to open a big can of worms. It is why I think the ESA has been used as a weapon so often, and I also belive it could be part of the reason why shady/ illegal stuff has been done.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

No you are being heard and its still a strange logic that my mind just cannot comprehend. I have been paying my tax's for 40 years, a number similar to that of which the Bundy family paid the proper fee to graze. I cannot just decide to stop paying based on the amount of time I have paid in.  If we decide to stop paying or bills or tax's we face late charges and increased fee's and or possible jail time. This is no different for the Bundy's, they stopped paying and that is simply called "Theft of services" which is a felony above a certain dollar amount. This doesn't even touch on the armed occupation that terrorized innocent workers at the wildlife facility in Ore that only adds to the crimes. Your argument would hold more weight had they not been paying the fee originally but to the contrary they stopped paying while others still paid their share for the same service.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...


MB

Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #64 on: January 13, 2018, 12:19:12 PM »
What if the government regulated you out of a job, but demanded the same taxes still be paid. 

A closer analogy would be if the government kept piling on regulation after regulation crippling your old family business yet the same taxes must be paid even though you can no longer stay in the black.  To loose this business is to loose a family legacy dating back generations.
I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 17409
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #65 on: January 13, 2018, 12:55:21 PM »
Some one with a ranching background may be able to clarify.
My understanding that the first iterations for the "fee" was not rent. It was mined collected to help develop the range land with water sources and such.

Belive it or not I appear to side with the Bundies because I would have loved to see discussion property rights.

Some questions I have not heard addressed that are the core of my issue.
Do you have to pay "rent" if you already have the right? If it's not rent what is it? When you pay $ you do so in consideration of some one else doing some thing.

I haven't done exhausted research on the issue which is why I would have liked the discussion to have revolved around it. It has not, and I've state my opinions why.

It's quite possible my writing skills have failed to express my understanding of the lifecycle of contracts, and the nature of property rights. Especially how they are different today because for 99% of us they have been reset several times. I Belive the Bundies may have been the 1%.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline M_ray

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 3802
  • Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #66 on: January 13, 2018, 05:52:41 PM »
Some one with a ranching background may be able to clarify.
My understanding that the first iterations for the "fee" was not rent. It was mined collected to help develop the range land with water sources and such.

Belive it or not I appear to side with the Bundies because I would have loved to see discussion property rights.

Some questions I have not heard addressed that are the core of my issue.
Do you have to pay "rent" if you already have the right? If it's not rent what is it? When you pay $ you do so in consideration of some one else doing some thing.

I haven't done exhausted research on the issue which is why I would have liked the discussion to have revolved around it. It has not, and I've state my opinions why.

It's quite possible my writing skills have failed to express my understanding of the lifecycle of contracts, and the nature of property rights. Especially how they are different today because for 99% of us they have been reset several times. I Belive the Bundies may have been the 1%.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The grazing fee is just that ...  a fee to graze your cattle a fee to compensate for the damage and food eaten and loss of the resource that is owned by you and me. He has the right to access those lands if he chose to hike or bird watch or take pictures but that same right doesn't transfer to each head of cattle.  Think of it this way ...  they are basically running business for profit and not paying into the system for their share of the added damage the cattle create and the reduction of the resource.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...


MB

Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!

Offline KFhunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13408
  • Location: The Wedge
  • My posts do not reflect an official opinion of HW
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #67 on: January 13, 2018, 07:00:25 PM »
Quote
The grazing fee is just that ...  a fee to graze your cattle a fee to compensate for the damage and food eaten and loss of the resource that is owned by you and me.
they are basically running business for profit and not paying into the system for their share of the added damage the cattle create and the reduction of the resource.

That's not true at all, if it were the grazing fee's would be a lot higher.  The fee is to offset infrastructure work that goes along with having cattle.  The fee's are to do projects like putting in additional water sources, fencing off stream beds to prevent erosion or fencing out critical habitat like wet land areas.  All of these things benefit wildlife as a whole, in dry areas putting in a water tank helps out everything from antelope to elk, you name it.  Even frogs, snakes and birds as the water can create a tiny wetland oasis.  The grazing contracts today have property improvement projects right in the contract, have you read any?  I have.

Responsible grazing can and does improve land but you never hear about that, probably never see it either.  People just buy into the tired old line of over grazing and welfare ranching.  I see a lot of misinformed hunters on here buying into the same tired old lines.  If overgrazing is happening then ask the BLM, DNR, USFWS responsible for that particular area whats up.  There are ranchers who've been running the same property for generations and some of them perhaps get a little lax on making sure the cattle don't sit in one spot too long, the BLM or whomever needs to make sure that isn't happening too. 

Some of the best deer hunting is in cattle grazed leases, the fall grasses will green up and there'll be a new growth for the deer, then in the winter months they'll paw trough it.  Cattle make nice trails through the brush allowing the rabbits, deer and other critters better access instead of just having a jungle of old rot that doesn't renew without a massive fire..cattle also reduce fire loads.  So in don't know where you get your information but perhaps you could study up on it.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2018, 07:06:05 PM by KFhunter »
I should be out hunting lions, thanks WDFW

Online Boss .300 winmag

  • Best Biggie Blogger
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9330
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • DAN-O CAN'T TAKE BIGGIE PICS
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #68 on: January 13, 2018, 07:29:59 PM »
Quote
The grazing fee is just that ...  a fee to graze your cattle a fee to compensate for the damage and food eaten and loss of the resource that is owned by you and me.
they are basically running business for profit and not paying into the system for their share of the added damage the cattle create and the reduction of the resource.

That's not true at all, if it were the grazing fee's would be a lot higher.  The fee is to offset infrastructure work that goes along with having cattle.  The fee's are to do projects like putting in additional water sources, fencing off stream beds to prevent erosion or fencing out critical habitat like wet land areas.  All of these things benefit wildlife as a whole, in dry areas putting in a water tank helps out everything from antelope to elk, you name it.  Even frogs, snakes and birds as the water can create a tiny wetland oasis.  The grazing contracts today have property improvement projects right in the contract, have you read any?  I have.

Responsible grazing can and does improve land but you never hear about that, probably never see it either.  People just buy into the tired old line of over grazing and welfare ranching.  I see a lot of misinformed hunters on here buying into the same tired old lines.  If overgrazing is happening then ask the BLM, DNR, USFWS responsible for that particular area whats up.  There are ranchers who've been running the same property for generations and some of them perhaps get a little lax on making sure the cattle don't sit in one spot too long, the BLM or whomever needs to make sure that isn't happening too. 

Some of the best deer hunting is in cattle grazed leases, the fall grasses will green up and there'll be a new growth for the deer, then in the winter months they'll paw trough it.  Cattle make nice trails through the brush allowing the rabbits, deer and other critters better access instead of just having a jungle of old rot that doesn't renew without a massive fire..cattle also reduce fire loads.  So in don't know where you get your information but perhaps you could study up on it.

 :yeah:

Iíve been in areas that were a total waste land due to lack of water, but the rancher had installed a trough for water supplied from a spring, thus water was stored for all types of fauna, instead of just running down hill and evaporating into thin air where nothing could benefit from it.  :tup:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.


Keep Calm And Duc On!

Offline idahohuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2347
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #69 on: January 13, 2018, 08:45:18 PM »
Some one with a ranching background may be able to clarify.
My understanding that the first iterations for the "fee" was not rent. It was mined collected to help develop the range land with water sources and such.

Belive it or not I appear to side with the Bundies because I would have loved to see discussion property rights.

Some questions I have not heard addressed that are the core of my issue.
Do you have to pay "rent" if you already have the right? If it's not rent what is it? When you pay $ you do so in consideration of some one else doing some thing.

I haven't done exhausted research on the issue which is why I would have liked the discussion to have revolved around it. It has not, and I've state my opinions why.

It's quite possible my writing skills have failed to express my understanding of the lifecycle of contracts, and the nature of property rights. Especially how they are different today because for 99% of us they have been reset several times. I Belive the Bundies may have been the 1%.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
You keep stating the Bundy's have rights on public land that simply never existed.  This is why they owe millions and have numerous court orders against them. 

There is no big property rights implication here.  It is extremely simple: his cow were trespassing, he was told to get them off the land since he didn't want to pay for a new grazing permit, and he refused to do so. 

He's probably really fortunate the land he was trespassing on was the federal governments...if it was another private landowner this clown of a family would probably be laying in some shallow graves in the Nevada desert somewhere. 

There are no legally recognized inherited grazing rights, preemptive rights, special rights, or grandfathered public-domain land-use rights held by the Bundy family or Bundy's ancestors. Bundy lost his special-rights arguments in the United States v. Bundy cases. Bundy had only base property and normal AUM grazing-allotment permits, like the permits of thousands of other ranchers throughout the western United States. The court found that Bundy and his father actually first began grazing their cattle on the Bunkerville Allotment in 1954 and used it for several years. They paid for cattle grazing again from 1973 until 1993, when Bundy paid the last fees for his final grazing application for the period from December 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993. On January 24, 1994, the Bureau of Land Management delivered a Proposed Decision Order to Remove and Demand for Payment to Bundy by placing it on the dashboard of Bundy's vehicle while he was in the vehicle. BLM officials allege that Bundy became agitated, descended from his truck and accused the BLM of harassing him. He then returned to his truck, threw the proposed order out of the window and drove away. One of Bundy's sons then picked up the document, tore it to pieces and threw it on the ground. On February 17, 1994, the BLM issued a final decision canceling Bundy's range-grazing permit. Bundy subsequently informed the BLM in several administrative notices that he intended to graze cattle "pursuant to my vested grazing rights". Bundy failed to demonstrate the existence of any such special rights when given an opportunity to do so in court.

And here is the actual court order spelling this all out.
https://www.scribd.com/document/218116757/1998-U-S-Dist-LEXIS-23835
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline bigtex

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 8112
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #70 on: January 13, 2018, 10:08:38 PM »
Some one with a ranching background may be able to clarify.
My understanding that the first iterations for the "fee" was not rent. It was mined collected to help develop the range land with water sources and such.

Belive it or not I appear to side with the Bundies because I would have loved to see discussion property rights.

Some questions I have not heard addressed that are the core of my issue.
Do you have to pay "rent" if you already have the right? If it's not rent what is it? When you pay $ you do so in consideration of some one else doing some thing.

I haven't done exhausted research on the issue which is why I would have liked the discussion to have revolved around it. It has not, and I've state my opinions why.

It's quite possible my writing skills have failed to express my understanding of the lifecycle of contracts, and the nature of property rights. Especially how they are different today because for 99% of us they have been reset several times. I Belive the Bundies may have been the 1%.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
You keep stating the Bundy's have rights on public land that simply never existed.  This is why they owe millions and have numerous court orders against them. 

There is no big property rights implication here.  It is extremely simple: his cow were trespassing, he was told to get them off the land since he didn't want to pay for a new grazing permit, and he refused to do so. 

He's probably really fortunate the land he was trespassing on was the federal governments...if it was another private landowner this clown of a family would probably be laying in some shallow graves in the Nevada desert somewhere. 

There are no legally recognized inherited grazing rights, preemptive rights, special rights, or grandfathered public-domain land-use rights held by the Bundy family or Bundy's ancestors. Bundy lost his special-rights arguments in the United States v. Bundy cases. Bundy had only base property and normal AUM grazing-allotment permits, like the permits of thousands of other ranchers throughout the western United States. The court found that Bundy and his father actually first began grazing their cattle on the Bunkerville Allotment in 1954 and used it for several years. They paid for cattle grazing again from 1973 until 1993, when Bundy paid the last fees for his final grazing application for the period from December 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993. On January 24, 1994, the Bureau of Land Management delivered a Proposed Decision Order to Remove and Demand for Payment to Bundy by placing it on the dashboard of Bundy's vehicle while he was in the vehicle. BLM officials allege that Bundy became agitated, descended from his truck and accused the BLM of harassing him. He then returned to his truck, threw the proposed order out of the window and drove away. One of Bundy's sons then picked up the document, tore it to pieces and threw it on the ground. On February 17, 1994, the BLM issued a final decision canceling Bundy's range-grazing permit. Bundy subsequently informed the BLM in several administrative notices that he intended to graze cattle "pursuant to my vested grazing rights". Bundy failed to demonstrate the existence of any such special rights when given an opportunity to do so in court.

And here is the actual court order spelling this all out.
https://www.scribd.com/document/218116757/1998-U-S-Dist-LEXIS-23835
:yeah:

Bundy keeps saying their relatives grazed on the land so they should be able to. Well should I go back to the family farm my gramps had in the 20s and take up stake? Most of you would probably laugh and say no, well it's the same thing for Bundy.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk


Offline farmin4u_98948

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 990
  • Location: Cliffdell
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #71 on: January 13, 2018, 10:25:11 PM »
Soooooooo.  When the Bundys act outside of the rules set forth by the Federal Government they are wrong.  But.  When Natives act n accordance itís their federal laws. Treaty Laws. They are wrong too.   Consistency  fellow HW members. And no. Itís not apples and oranges.    :stirthepot:  there are huge similarities.   Do I have any experience in this.  Yes. Working with my uncle in south central Oregon. Watching the fed government take over State land. Understanding that the Bundys war was against the feds. Not the State.  Look carefully. The states are locked in a loosing struggle with the feds.   Lots more I could say.  The Bundys are a pawn in States vs Feds.  Sorry. RATTLE AND RANT.
Just because you believe something is true doesn't mean that it is true!

Offline idahohuntr

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2347
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #72 on: January 13, 2018, 11:03:47 PM »
Soooooooo.  When the Bundys act outside of the rules set forth by the Federal Government they are wrong.  But.  When Natives act n accordance itís their federal laws. Treaty Laws. They are wrong too.   Consistency  fellow HW members. And no. Itís not apples and oranges.    :stirthepot:  there are huge similarities.   Do I have any experience in this.  Yes. Working with my uncle in south central Oregon. Watching the fed government take over State land. Understanding that the Bundys war was against the feds. Not the State.  Look carefully. The states are locked in a loosing struggle with the feds.   Lots more I could say.  The Bundys are a pawn in States vs Feds.  Sorry. RATTLE AND RANT.
Your mention of treaties has no bearing on this case.  Many tribes in the Northwest have treaties with the United States...in exchange for land they reserved many rights including fishing and hunting.

The Bundys do not have any treaty with the US...sorry, but it is apples and oranges.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline NW SURVEYOR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 295
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
  • Groups: RMEF NRA
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #73 on: January 14, 2018, 06:05:59 AM »
Farming 4U states that the "Feds" are taking over "State" land in Oregon.
As a surveyor in WA, OR and ID I seriously doubt this is indeed fact.

As for Bundy, all this clown had to do was pay his grazing fees like any other responsible rancher and things would have been fine.
No, this idiot wants sell the ides that some sort of "Prescriptive Right" has ripened which is not the case.
There is no provision for Adverse Possession or Prescriptive Right against the sovereign AKA, The United States Government.
This is how the BLM, FS and the US Government protects "Our" land from the likes of Mr. Bundy.

I can see the day when Bundy would put up "No Trespassing" signs on land that he does not own.
Imagine suing an area for 20 years and then posting it as your own.
This is stealing from the rest of the people in the country.

Bundy has used the land for free, refused to pay his bill and cost the taxpayers of this country millions of dollars with his BS.
He is not a hero, he is a thief and no better than someone ripping of the government by collecting welfare while able to work.
The whole families a joke.

Online h20hunter

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 16218
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: The Bundy Trial: When Justice Fails
« Reply #74 on: January 14, 2018, 07:18:05 AM »
Yyyyyyyuuup!
Yes, my FJ is pink, I'm all about Team Jacob, beer is not for the horses nor is whiskey for the men, they are both for me.

 

* Recent Topics

FS: Sitka Gradient Jacket size 3xl by Sneaky
[Today at 05:39:02 PM]


Custom cut lumber by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 05:38:54 PM]


Good Story by Watimberghost
[Today at 05:37:52 PM]


Shot out my 243 by Biggerhammer
[Today at 05:37:39 PM]


Beetle clean a skull service/WTB by rsrubalcaba
[Today at 05:35:33 PM]


For Sale Springfield XDS 9mm + extras by Sneaky
[Today at 05:29:42 PM]


FS: half case of black cloud 12ga ammunition by Sneaky
[Today at 05:28:23 PM]


Landscapes (pics) by scotsman
[Today at 05:20:28 PM]


Keegan Wilder fundraiser auction #16 .22 mag ammo from Ghost Hunter by jackelope
[Today at 05:20:12 PM]


Idaho Archery Elk in Pioneer Zone by buglebuster
[Today at 05:11:07 PM]


White's Boots by jackelope
[Today at 05:07:13 PM]


FS Browning BAR 300 Win. Mag. w/Leupold Scope and extras by elkoholic1
[Today at 04:58:27 PM]


Reliable bow string brand by elkoholic1
[Today at 04:55:43 PM]


Scouting a new trapline by Bigjon
[Today at 04:43:59 PM]


FS / FT: Savage Lady Hunter .243 w/ leupold 3-9 scope by bobcat
[Today at 04:42:23 PM]


wtb, USED CEDAR FENCE BOARDS by Harleysboss
[Today at 04:37:50 PM]


Training/Field Collar Recommendations by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 04:36:08 PM]


Bacon cure? by NRA4LIFE
[Today at 04:33:45 PM]


.17 HMR, Thoughts? by b23
[Today at 04:11:04 PM]


Fly fishing set up by AlbinoRhino
[Today at 04:01:31 PM]