collapse
Double U Hunting Supply Headin West Hunt Consulting

Author Topic: Poll - skinny public land access  (Read 2246 times)

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 3353
Poll - skinny public land access
« on: March 22, 2018, 01:11:33 PM »
In the past, I've felt comfortable hunting up to 200 yards or so from a boundary when I am using On X and know exactly where the boundary is.  This situation is a bit different, I found a potential new honey hole in a unit that has difficult access.  I happened to notice that a very small sliver of public land intersects a county road and one could potentially park on public and walk a narrow public corridor to a much larger piece of contiguous public land to hunt.  The parking and access corridor are the only concern, once you get in there you are hunting a very large piece of contiguous public land.

So, the question is how narrow of a corridor would you park and walk through without worrying about trespassing?  Post a number in yards below.  Assume you have On X and the phone app and no other issues other than you want to be sure you are parking and walking on public 100% of the time.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42388
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2018, 01:17:55 PM »
I do it without onx. its where a corner piece of state intersects a county road.  I know the fence corner is state and it is accessible from the easement of the county road.   

I also do it with a duck photography spot.   Wildlife section is about 20 feet wide. About 100 yards in it widens to a much bigger piece of land
My website.....DDK Photography
http://ddkphotography.pixels.com

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 34977
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2018, 01:21:41 PM »
I would think you'd need at least 30 feet but even then there's no guarantee the GPS and/or the parcel lines on your map are accurate enough to ensure you're not trespassing. But I'd probably still do it because if it's not obvious where the boundaries are how would they even prove you weren't on the strip of public?

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2663
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2018, 01:24:07 PM »
Sounds exactly like a spot I hunt! Theres like a 5 foot section that gets you into a mountainside of state land, without huntonx you would never find it!
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline idaho guy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 832
  • Location: hayden
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2018, 01:30:28 PM »
Ten yards but I would probably do it with a yard or two of public.  :chuckle: As long as you have good evidence(onx maps etc) of public land and its not marked in any way I would go for it!

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 18656
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Wake me when you need me.
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2018, 01:35:41 PM »
I would have at it with one yard.

Trespass only occurs if you don't leave when asked. If you have any kind of credible evidence it would make it pretty hard for a Leo to charge you with trespass. 2c

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

The Truth is like Poetry, and most people hate Poetry

Offline npaull

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 936
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2018, 01:40:02 PM »
 :yeah:

It's either public, or it's not. If it's public, you're fine.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 3353
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2018, 01:45:24 PM »
All right, I guess I am being a wimp.  I have plenty of room to park and hike so I'll check it out.  I just hope there isn't a cliff I can't get around halfway up the corridor, it's only about 200 yards until it opens up so I should be able to get through.

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1001
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2018, 03:18:50 PM »
How wide is your boot?  Timberland has to be conspicuously posted against trespassing, or the owner has to personally communicate to you that it is closed, or fenced.   
But don't be surprised if the "no trespassing" signs slop onto public land.

Offline Stein

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 3353
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2018, 03:21:45 PM »
Yeah, I have seen plenty of fake or wrong trespassing signs.  I was really surprised to see the shape and location of this slot.  Iím now going to look for more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline syoungs

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1628
  • Location: tri cities, WA
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2018, 03:26:39 PM »
Im pretty comfortable with most situations being 10 yds wide or so. if the area is marked off in any fashion (fenceline or something) a few feet and im doing it.

in Wyoming this year we had a spot roughly 20' long, along the side of a road, where we could access 400 acres. saw lots of trucks pass it up, made the onx system worth every penny.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17337
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2018, 03:29:09 PM »
Turn tracking on with the GPS. It will record where you walk. If the map shows you were on public ground the entire way you would have a solid defense if challenged.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline cougforester

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 377
  • Location: Tacoma, WA
  • Groups: DU, RMEF
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2018, 03:52:10 PM »
Turn tracking on with the GPS. It will record where you walk. If the map shows you were on public ground the entire way you would have a solid defense if challenged.

I did this during last fall when I was hunting south of Spokane. An adjacent landowner to the parcel I had permission on thought he saw me walking around his fields, but I knew this could be an issue so I had my tracks on the entire time. He apologized, wished me good luck and we went our separate ways.

Offline Shawn Ryan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 608
  • Location: Battle Ground, WA
  • Snoozing in elk country.
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2018, 04:05:46 PM »

Trespass only occurs if you don't leave when asked. If you have any kind of credible evidence it would make it pretty hard for a Leo to charge you with trespass. 2c

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

That's not great legal advice; no offense meant.

Agree that using the tracking on your GPS will likely persuade an LEO not to move forward with a citation, but if a landowner wants to bring an action, the GPS will be good evidence, but not determinative.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 17337
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA
Re: Poll - skinny public land access
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2018, 04:29:30 PM »
While not definitive, use of a GPS with current maps and tracking on shows a concerted effort to be legal
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 

* Recent Topics

Brown bear hunting in Kamchatka by cazadormad
[Today at 05:44:46 AM]


new 257 caliber bullet by jasnt
[Today at 05:14:04 AM]


Wolves tree DNR worker in Okanogan county by bigtex
[Today at 04:33:52 AM]


Is this okay? by BB11b
[Today at 03:08:08 AM]


Elk Hunt Focus/Resolve? by JWEBB
[Today at 12:19:11 AM]


Reloading for accuracy/consistency help by JeffRaines
[Yesterday at 11:52:17 PM]


Anyone know what this is? by AWS
[Yesterday at 11:40:15 PM]


WTB Quality 15x56 or bigger Knockers by redi
[Yesterday at 11:22:19 PM]


new to the forum:) by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 11:18:14 PM]


Your classic ride (car or bike) by runamuk
[Yesterday at 10:31:15 PM]


Huntwa bear id test by Oh Mah
[Yesterday at 10:17:54 PM]


WTB: AR500 STEEL TARGETS -WTB by TRD1911
[Yesterday at 09:54:22 PM]


Mudflow cow tag by Brandobando
[Yesterday at 09:12:41 PM]


eyes in the woods by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 09:00:10 PM]


WTS 2007 Baja 90 quad $450 by JWEBB
[Yesterday at 08:59:53 PM]


Dog Food by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 08:58:37 PM]


WTB reloading equipment by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 08:46:41 PM]


Fall Road Trip Plans; Both Short & Long? by Backstrap
[Yesterday at 08:45:34 PM]


Candidates by Lucky1
[Yesterday at 08:26:48 PM]


Big bows by Ricon650
[Yesterday at 08:18:42 PM]