collapse
Quality Hunts for over 30 Years Be a more successful hunter!

Author Topic: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer  (Read 14443 times)

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42140
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2009, 09:12:17 AM »
I figure 25-26 on the frame.  They must be counting that stupid kicker.  There is NO WAY he is 29 inches.   I wonder how he would measure up with Boone?

Offline Slider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2585
    • www.albinovest.com
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2009, 09:41:21 AM »
not going to see a typical much bigger than that in any book

Yea what Phool said!!! The reason he may look small is because he is not wide. And because it is a front view and you really can't see the depth of his forks. He is a Giant Typical!!!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42140
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2009, 09:47:23 AM »
I don't think that angle gives you the full appreciation of what his g4s look like.  They are absolutely INCREDIBLE.  I also think with that score, his mains are probably longer that what the picture shows.

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 9729
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2009, 09:53:32 AM »
I see what you mean.  The picture is deceiving because of the angle and the ears.  He only looks about as wide as his ears though (even if they were propped up), but the text says he is 29" wide not counting the cheater. 
I guess 226" is outlandish for a typical.  Lots of higher scoring deer out there, but all non-typicals.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42140
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2009, 09:57:23 AM »
I still think its  :liar: that its 29 (without the cheater).  If he is, better show Charlie this guys cape as he has record book EARS.  The money I have left after Obama has had his hands in my pockets is that its 26.

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 9729
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2009, 10:01:57 AM »
If he is, better show Charlie this guys cape as he has record book EARS.
:yeah:
...Maybe a new SCI Category...?
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 36694
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: WSB RMGA NRA RMEF BHA
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2009, 10:29:21 AM »
I figure 25-26 on the frame.  They must be counting that stupid kicker.  There is NO WAY he is 29 inches.   I wonder how he would measure up with Boone?

209 and change unofficial
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 42140
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2009, 10:35:50 AM »
I certainyl could buy that with those forks. I figured a hair or two over 200.  I'm trying to see if he has 2 eyeguards or not. 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 26274
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2009, 12:34:25 PM »
Quote
I guess 226" is outlandish for a typical.  Lots of higher scoring deer out there, but all non-typicals.

Exactly!!

 and 29" has to be including the cheater, love those G4's though.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Bigshooter

  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 5518
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2009, 12:41:02 PM »
The same picture is on the cover of Muley Heaven Two, I believe.  He looks big on the cover but in the video he looks huge.
"Thou shalt not speak ill of any Republican."

Obama lied and US Healthcare died!

"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Slider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2585
    • www.albinovest.com
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2009, 02:29:02 PM »
The difference between Boone and Crockett and S.C.I. is basically B.C. scoring system tries to make a PERFECT rack out of the animals antler's while it's being scored. S.C.I. doesn't.

Basically, the difference between SCI scoring and B&C scoring, is that SCI does not deduct for horns or antlers not being symmetrical.

Where this hurts the score is the case where a point or tine exists on one one side, but the corresponding point either didn't grow as long or was broken on the other side. Under the B&C scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, then the difference in their length would be subtracted from the sub-total. Under the SCI scoring, the lengths of both of these points would be entered, and there would not be any deductions.

For Typical entries, under B&C, lengths of non-typical points are entered, then subtracted. Under SCI scoring, lengths of non-typical points are only entered in the supplemental information section and are not included in the total score. Basically, under both systems, only typical measurements are counted for the total score.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2009, 10:34:38 PM by Slider »

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 9729
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2009, 03:09:46 PM »
Quote
I guess 226" is outlandish for a typical.  Lots of higher scoring deer out there, but all non-typicals.

Exactly!!

 and 29" has to be including the cheater, love those G4's though.

Text says that the spread is 29" NOT including the cheater.  Doesn't look right to me either. 
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline jjhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1547
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2009, 04:52:34 PM »
I can think of two typical frames off the top of my head that would dwarf this buck.  The bigfoot buck (40" frame buck shot by Dennis Winch) has a 238" ish typical frame.  The Mundy buck has the largest typical frame ever at 246" - it nets 238"!  No comparison.  Some of the largest typical frames are hidden in B&C under the non-typical category.   This buck is supposed to net 209" - I doubt it.  There are a bunch of deer that beat it either way.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Off-Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 26274
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2009, 08:18:15 PM »
Where did you guys get the 209 score from, I dont see any reference to it on the page. If that thing grosses 226" I don't see 17" of deductions either. Not that it matters but I prefer the SCI scoring myself, if the buck grows it I think it should be counted, as far as B&C goes I pay little attention to the net, I go by gross :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 36694
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: WSB RMGA NRA RMEF BHA
Re: Pending New SCI World Record Mule Deer
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2009, 08:26:32 PM »
he's a mossback buck too...
mossbacks site says he is 236 gross 226 net.
scroll down to the bottom.
http://mossback.com/Home/html/2008_bucks.html

i just read where one of the other guys posted earlier in the thread he was 209 net.  :dunno: jjhunter maybe?
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

 

* Recent Topics

Please delete by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 09:33:14 AM]


Newbie reloading question by Jolten
[Today at 09:11:37 AM]


WTS 28 gauge Stevens model 550/555 by cem3434
[Today at 09:11:26 AM]


Bigshooter and Trapperguy22 NE WA Turkey Hunt 2018 by Bigshooter
[Today at 09:06:42 AM]


exposed to elements by Skyvalhunter
[Today at 09:03:05 AM]


Bad Outfitters and what did you do? by Hoythunter
[Today at 09:01:33 AM]


ladder test results, advice needed by lokidog
[Today at 08:59:42 AM]


Blues bull by Skyvalhunter
[Today at 08:55:48 AM]


Rock Shoot-Moses Lake by Machias
[Today at 08:39:49 AM]


WTS Vortex Vultures,Diamondbacks,Winston 8 wt, Lamson Remix by coyote_out
[Today at 08:38:18 AM]


Dont try this sturgeon fishing. by dc
[Today at 08:32:29 AM]


50 cal Knight Bighorn by jackelope
[Today at 08:24:25 AM]


WTS Savage weather warrior 7mm/Nikon Prostaff 5 by spoonman
[Today at 08:14:09 AM]


Turkey season 2018 by scotrobe
[Today at 08:10:43 AM]


Who wanted the 22/250 brass and ammo? by h20hunter
[Today at 08:05:20 AM]


FS/FT: Bear Recurve Bows by Goose Noose
[Today at 07:58:54 AM]


When should you consider “all hope is lost?” by SCRUBS
[Today at 07:47:27 AM]


Dont Educate Em by ctwiggs1
[Today at 07:13:07 AM]


No more animals, can't draw a tag and the world is ending by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:41:09 AM]


Alaska in October by asmith
[Today at 03:31:45 AM]