collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications  (Read 10057 times)

Offline Abolt338

  • Volunteer Wild Animal Population Control Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 151
  • Location: Cashmere, WA / Los Angeles, CA
My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« on: August 07, 2008, 12:19:56 PM »
I thought that maybe some of you would be interested...

--- ---

Dear Director and Commission,

My name is Rylan Weythman.  I am a lifelong resident of Washington State - an avid hunter, fisherman, and outdoorsman. 

I am writing in regards to the shooting incident that took place this past week when a young bear hunter unfortunately took the life of an innocent hiker.  The news shocked me just as much as the rest of the state, and I am deeply sympathetic, both towards the family of the victim as well as the young hunter whose life will never be the same.

In spite of my emotions on this issue, however, I am concerned over the announcement of possible regulation changes - specifically those concerning the closure of public lands to hunters and the establishment of a minimum hunting age.

In times like these it is most important to avoid distraction and stay grounded when evaluating the effects of an incident.  Was this a tragic experience?  Of course.  Should it have been avoided?  Of course.  Does it necessitate changes to the above-mentioned regulations?  Absolutely not.

Public lands are just that:  Public.  When we restrict public lands to only certain forms of legal activity, we transform those lands into something that is no longer public but selective.  Who is to say that hunters and hikers should have different rights to equally public lands?  If we prevent hunters from accessing portions of public land to prevent interactions with hikers, are we not shifting from a fair and balanced division of use (something that public land by definition should entail)?  The same could be said if the roles were reversed. 

Hunters are constantly losing access to nature due to development, community-imposed no shooting zones, and increased regulation.  It would be a travesty, however, for regulators in Washington to allow further loss of access due to one very, very rare incident.  Hunting is too important to conservation efforts and our culture, and it is something that must be regulated with great care and consideration.

In regards to imposing a minimum age for hunters, I must ask the question, "On what grounds?"

Washington averages approximately ten hunting-related shooting accidents each year; a great majority of which involve the shooting of someone in the hunting party.  In fact, the incident I alluded to at the beginning of my letter was the first of its kind in the past twenty-five years.

Furthermore, if we look at the statistics, we see that of those ten accidents per year, children are involved in very few, if any.  So on what basis do we establish a minimum age for hunters?  Certainly it's not out of public concern over incident rates.  If that was the case, we would be better served to regulate the minimum age for riding a bike, playing on a public playground, or chewing gum - as these activities have significantly higher accident rates for American youth.

People will argue that shooting a firearm requires a great deal of responsibility and maturity.  I agree.  Anyone who has the power to take a life must exercise control over their weapon, their demeanor, and their decisions.  But these advocates will further argue that children under a certain age - the age varies with each opinion - are not capable of such control.  With this I disagree. 

If their argument is true, where are the accidents?  Where are the numbers?  Where are the news clippings?  The short-sighted few will point to the incident this past week as proof, but let us not forget that this hunter was a teenager and that this type of incident is rarer than being struck by lightening.

In light of this, setting a minimum age for hunters accomplishes nothing in the realm of public safety.  What it does do, however, is restrict parents from assessing their child's unique ability and maturity, and it prevents parents from introducing their children to an activity that has been passed down from generation to generation.  As a society, we are already losing our children to video games, gangs, and drugs.  Why would we want to deter them from participating in an activity that promotes health, responsibility, maturity, and self-reliance?

The more I read about last week's incident, the stronger I feel that this isn't about land use or sharing terrain, and it isn't about people being too young to hunt.  It's about a lack of supervision.

Instead of restricting hunters' access to public lands or instituting a minimum age for hunters, Washington State should simply require young hunters to hunt under direct supervision of an adult.  That way we encourage the role of mentoring and we reduce the already low risk that someone will get hurt in the field.

Sincerely,

Rylan Weythman
Cashmere, WA
There's no place like the middle of nowhere!!!

Offline KillBilly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 3667
  • Location: OLY, WA.
  • I kill therefore I Am
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2008, 12:37:24 PM »
Very well articulated.
Some people spend their entire life wondering if they made a difference. Marines don't have that problem.
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother.

Offline DeKuma

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2016
  • Location: Burlington, WA
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2008, 12:38:14 PM »
Well executed Rylan.  You obviously took time in wordsmithing your response without emotion and it shows.
- Scott

Offline Ellensburg

  • Official Cynergy Club Member
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1539
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2008, 12:38:46 PM »
If u are under the age of 16 aren't u already required to have an adult (18+) with u?

Offline Ridgerunner

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 4917
  • Location: Enumclaw
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2008, 12:45:10 PM »
GREAT Email.  This is exactly the stuff they need to get.   :IBCOOL:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2008, 12:48:03 PM »
You have to be 14+ to hunt w/out adult supervision.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline huntingnut

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 732
  • Location: Yakima
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2008, 12:48:22 PM »
Well said! The only think I see differently is, maybe they shouldn't limit it to youth hunters, but included first time hunters of any age. Some one in there twenties or thirties that has no prior hunting or gun experience could be just as dangerous. Make them hunt with an experienced hunter for a couple of years to learn safety in the field and not just out of a book. Just my  :twocents:

Offline cabin308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 294
  • Location: Spokane Valley
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2008, 12:56:56 PM »
Very well done, Rylan.  Thank you.    :tup: :tup:

Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2008, 12:58:35 PM »
I sounded off to the director. Sure hope they think about this before they do something drastic.

Offline tlbradford

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3518
  • Location: Veradale
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #9 on: August 07, 2008, 02:27:33 PM »
When did the requirement for being age 14 kick in?  Great letter, we all need to take the time to write something like that.
Dreams are forever on the mind, realization in the hands.

Offline Abolt338

  • Volunteer Wild Animal Population Control Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 151
  • Location: Cashmere, WA / Los Angeles, CA
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2008, 02:37:14 PM »
I submitted it to the editor of the Seattle Times as well (along with the author of the story).  Maybe it'll get some attention, maybe it won't.

RW
There's no place like the middle of nowhere!!!

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #11 on: August 07, 2008, 02:39:00 PM »
If you did not know there is a page at the http://nra-ila.org where you can email all kinds of media and legislators. I just found it last night. You have to be a member and log in to use it.

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #12 on: August 07, 2008, 02:41:39 PM »
By the way. My read on it is that they will change the opening date or even close some seasons which happen with rifles before October in order to reduce conflict with hikers. Get ready people. Letters to Koenig is not going to be all we need.

Online rainshadow1

  • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3258
  • Location: Selah, WA - Sequim, WA
  • Custom Calls and Knives
    • http://www.facebook.com/pages/RainShadow-Game-Calls-Custom-Knives/133406026689512?ref=hl
    • RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #13 on: August 07, 2008, 03:06:36 PM »
It's easy to find your State reps and senators e-mails. I've already done that and sent a note.

Well done, A-Bolt.
- - Steve
View and Purchase/Order Custom Calls!
Cougar Hunters!!! Check out Calling Products and Call-In Stories!
View the Blade Gallery, & Purchase/Order a Custom Knife!
 www.rain-shadow.com

RainShadow Game Calls & Custom Knives on Facebook

Labrador Retrievers - https://rainshadowlabradors.com

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: My letter to WDFW regarding the shooting and its implications
« Reply #14 on: August 07, 2008, 03:07:08 PM »
Yes but with this form you can email them all and any media folks in your local area in one shot.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal