Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access
Central Firearms Offender Registry Legislation Passed 4/17 Update now a Database
csaaphill:
probably should be faught against although most sponsors are republicans. however i see the good intentions on this bill still wondering if it's too far reaching.
bigtex:
I assume most people will have issues with the bill because of RCW 77.15.460 - loaded firearm in a motor vehicle, especially since it is a pretty common hunting violation. However as the bill is written it is up to the court to decide if the offender will need to register on this registry. It is not the same as sex crimes where a conviction means automatic registry requirement.
Mudman:
Cannot support this labeling registry/sex offender type leg. Cant leos already find this info readily? Arent background checks incorporated with this info? I say H-- no to this. Its redundant and a waste of $. Too much power for judges, what if its a liberal judge?
JimmyHoffa:
--- Quote from: bigtex on February 07, 2013, 04:52:32 PM ---I assume most people will have issues with the bill because of RCW 77.15.460 - loaded firearm in a motor vehicle, especially since it is a pretty common hunting violation.
--- End quote ---
Mostly because that RCW can so easily be actual honest mistakes. The others on that list show (imo) some intent to break laws.
Mudman:
Nobody has answered my question? Leos, dont you have this info at your fingertips already? Isnt it included in background checks? If yes then what does this leg. acoomplish?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version