collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 4-point rule 117/121  (Read 96339 times)

Offline hambone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 594
  • Location: spokane valley
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #105 on: July 17, 2013, 10:17:33 PM »
I seen some big bucks  in 49 help drag a buck up to a ridge that was huge hope the 4 point rule helps the herd

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4878
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #106 on: July 18, 2013, 07:54:43 AM »
http://www.whitetailinstitute.com/info/news/jul03/2.html

It looks like Charles J. Alsheimer agrees with you PA.
I asked my friend to respond to the idea of no exemptions for first time hunters or youth hunters when it comes to antler restrictions. He said.  “I think it's ridiculous to place such rules on kids. Kids are processing a lot of rules when it comes to hunting…. safety, taking good shots, ethics, etc. Overloading them with all this, then requiring that they be able to make a snap decision regarding the size of a buck’s antlers width is a bit much. They cannot handle it. If you place too many rules on youngsters, they’ll quit.  Kids want to be successful. There have been many studies done that show that kids who are not successful drop out of the endeavor./b]
Good Article Our young generation is a fast food generation. I've worked w/youth at church, apprentice lineman and my own kids. This one statement says it all. Thanks for posting.

Offline Hunt4ever

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 271
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #107 on: July 18, 2013, 08:07:50 AM »
http://www.whitetailinstitute.com/info/news/jul03/2.html

It looks like Charles J. Alsheimer agrees with you PA.
I asked my friend to respond to the idea of no exemptions for first time hunters or youth hunters when it comes to antler restrictions. He said.  “I think it's ridiculous to place such rules on kids. Kids are processing a lot of rules when it comes to hunting…. safety, taking good shots, ethics, etc. Overloading them with all this, then requiring that they be able to make a snap decision regarding the size of a buck’s antlers width is a bit much. They cannot handle it. If you place too many rules on youngsters, they’ll quit.  Kids want to be successful. There have been many studies done that show that kids who are not successful drop out of the endeavor./b]
Good Article Our young generation is a fast food generation. I've worked w/youth at church, apprentice lineman and my own kids. This one statement says it all. Thanks for posting.


I shot my first deer at 8 y/o and my dad made me pass up at least 5 spike to fork bucks just to get rid of the fever a little and teach me to be selective and make smart shots... I never lost interest... There are antler restrictions of many kinds in this state and others and the idea to start the kids off shooting any moving target because they dont have to follow the rules, then cut them loose a few years down the road and just expect there age to change there judgment (I see some fork muleys hitting the ground in there future).... I love the restriction

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50514
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #108 on: July 18, 2013, 10:31:35 AM »
I really disagree PA, and that's OK.    I really don't buy into the Give every Kid an A attitude.  Failure brings success.  I have a hard time swallowing the Entitlement generations antics.   If its too much for them to be able to discern between a legal deer and a not legal deer, then maybe they shouldn't be standing behind a high powered rifle, willing to take a life. :dunno:

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9011
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #109 on: July 18, 2013, 10:46:43 AM »
I wonder if anyone thinks that kids should be allowed to any bull in 3 pt minimum westside elk units.  Or any bull in eastern washington? 

Hunting for spike elk is difficult right?  Should the elk herd be threatened further so kids can kill one?  Is this much different than the proposed changes for youth hunter for the whitetail in 117/121?

I'm not trying to  :stirthepot: I pose these questions because I don't see a big difference here.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8106
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #110 on: July 18, 2013, 10:51:27 AM »
 :yeah:
I grew up hunting mule deer and didn't expect to be able to shoot a spike or forky because I was a child. I didn't have a sense of entitlement like that. I hunted for legal bucks unless I drew a doe tag then I hunted.for does. The children can already shoot a doe during.the Whitetail youth seasons...

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #111 on: July 18, 2013, 10:56:53 AM »
I really disagree PA, and that's OK.    I really don't buy into the Give every Kid an A attitude.  Failure brings success.  I have a hard time swallowing the Entitlement generations antics.   If its too much for them to be able to discern between a legal deer and a not legal deer, then maybe they shouldn't be standing behind a high powered rifle, willing to take a life. :dunno:

 :tup:
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4878
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #112 on: July 18, 2013, 12:04:59 PM »
to each there own. Just my  :twocents: I have a lot of experience w/first timer hunters, I know that there are different schools of thought on this, but what I do know is that a solid rest and shot placement is very important for the young hunter, just the wt. of the gun makes off hand shots impossible. By the time, not always, when you figure out it's a legal buck it's too late for a shot. Some not so carefull adults taking kids out will let them take a risky shot, then the kids freaks out over a wounded deer. I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion. 

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9011
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #113 on: July 18, 2013, 02:23:03 PM »
I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion.

There should be cow tags for where there are no cows?  Is that how you meant it?  :dunno:

I too was thinking it was nice to have a relatively less flammatory conversation about a "Hot Topic"  :tup:
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4878
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #114 on: July 18, 2013, 03:12:30 PM »
I also think there should be cow tags for youth in the North west corner where there are no cow. BTW, it's nice to have civil discussion.

There should be cow tags for where there are no cows?  Is that how you meant it?  :dunno:

I too was thinking it was nice to have a relatively less flammatory conversation about a "Hot Topic"  :tup:
OOPs that would be no cow tags at all. :sry:

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8106
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #115 on: July 18, 2013, 03:14:05 PM »
I understood what was meant.  :chuckle:
I would also be on board with that!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50514
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #116 on: July 18, 2013, 03:28:07 PM »
I'd rather get the population higher first.  I only like antlerless hunts when the population needs to be thinned out for health reasons, damage control or carrying capacity.   I very much disagree with antlerless hunts just for opportunity.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12860
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #117 on: July 18, 2013, 03:29:46 PM »
I'd rather get the population higher first.  I only like antlerless hunts when the population needs to be thinned out for health reasons, damage control or carrying capacity.   I very much disagree with antlerless hunts just for opportunity.

:yeah:

sent from my typewriter

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8706
  • Location: NCW
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #118 on: July 18, 2013, 04:15:02 PM »
I'd go statewide all species(deer).......but thats just me.   :chuckle:

Me too........and that doesn't include eye guards!

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9011
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: 4-point rule 117/121
« Reply #119 on: July 18, 2013, 04:28:04 PM »
I'd go statewide all species(deer).......but thats just me.   :chuckle:

Me too........and that doesn't include eye guards!

You've never hunted blacktail have you?
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

328/329 reports by chukarchaser
[Today at 06:36:57 AM]


Late huckelberry bull by BrockWeilep
[Today at 05:22:54 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Buckhunter28
[Today at 04:09:51 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by str8meat
[Yesterday at 11:35:51 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by Wolfdog2314
[Yesterday at 10:33:59 PM]


Unit 130/ 139 by JCBrown
[Yesterday at 10:23:16 PM]


My first Bobcat by BelongsOutside
[Yesterday at 10:06:04 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by MikeC
[Yesterday at 08:59:03 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Rob Allen
[Yesterday at 08:46:49 PM]


My first blacktail! by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:41:08 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 07:34:44 PM]


Montana Elk Partner?? by redi
[Yesterday at 07:28:35 PM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by Rat44
[Yesterday at 06:59:16 PM]


Flank steak on the Rec Teq by brew
[Yesterday at 06:46:02 PM]


Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 06:45:25 PM]


Turkey Summer Sausage by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 05:57:02 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by chukarchaser
[Yesterday at 05:51:34 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Yesterday at 05:08:18 PM]


Well, it could be worse... by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 04:04:39 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:38:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal