Packing out quarters. What order?

Big Game Hunting > Elk Hunting

<< < (6/9) > >>

bobcat:

--- Quote from: boneaddict on August 19, 2007, 06:08:47 AM ---Basically I think the gist of the law is to keep some *censored* from running around with a set of spike antlers, shooting cows and claiming they belong to the antlers back at the truck. Though a pain in the ass, it seem pretty reasonable to me.

--- End quote ---

But the law doesn't prevent that, if my interpretation of the law is correct.

Curly:
Bob, maybe your interpretation is incorrect.

Here is what Provider quoted: "Evidence of sex means: Male- head with antlers or horns attached or penis or testes naturally attached (naturally to the carcass) to at least one quarter of the carcass or to the largest portion of meat."

I bolded what I think the key to the wording is. Naturally to the carcass.........does that mean that the head can't be removed?

boneaddict:

--- Quote ---But the law doesn't prevent that, if my interpretation of the law is correct.
--- End quote ---

That surprises you?
Wheres the lawyer?
Now I'm confused and will have to go back and read all of your posts....
I get the testicle thing if there is NO head.
If there is a whole head, brains, sunken eyeballs and such with antlers attached, NO testicles neccessary.
If there is a set of antlers, sawed off, because I don't want to carry the damn head out, or I want to travel back home to NM and I don't want to be in trouble with CWD etc,
Do I need the testicles on or not???

billythekidrock:

--- Quote from: Curly on August 19, 2007, 07:35:05 AM ---Bob, maybe your interpretation is incorrect.

Here is what Provider quoted: "Evidence of sex means: Male- head with antlers or horns attached or penis or testes naturally attached (naturally to the carcass) to at least one quarter of the carcass or to the largest portion of meat."

I bolded what I think the key to the wording is. Naturally to the carcass.........does that mean that the head can't be removed?

--- End quote ---

That is what I understood it to be, either the nuts attached to a hind quarter or the rack/head attached to a front quarter or half.

bobcat:
I am only saying it doesn't prevent that from happening because somebody could have a spike elk head (with antlers attached) and that could be used to go along with a cow elk to make it look legal. Your interpretation of the law is the same as mine. (I think) I interpret the law to mean if you have the head, you don't need testicles. It's one, or the other, not both.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version