collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Why not the Taurus? (44)  (Read 10457 times)

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Why not the Taurus? (44)
« on: November 10, 2014, 09:15:42 AM »
I have held and cycled the action on the Taurus lightweight 44's... they fit my hand great. I am looking for and needing a packable, 4 inch 44 mag for backpacking and archery hunting. I like/love the 629 and the new 69... but they are in the neighboorhood of 3-5 hundred dollars more.

This gun will NOT be shot a lot... it will be packed on my hip belt and stuffed under the front seat... it'll get a few hundred rounds through it over the next 5 years... Is there anything to be scared of?

Just curious, cause armslist has one local here... its the Ti lite...
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline elkinrutdrivemenuts

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2014, 09:18:20 AM »
I had the Taurus Raging bull 44.  The barrel blew in half in my hands.  Thats why not!
I got a brand new pistol as a replacement, and the cylinder play was so sloppy, I was afraid to even shoot it.  Maybe I got 2 lemons, but I wont own another.

Offline wildmanoutdoors

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2014, 09:32:22 AM »
I had an M44 and the cylinder would lock up and or come out of timing. There servive was great, but at what cost.

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2014, 09:40:00 AM »
That sucks... I guess you get what you pay for?? Any positive feedback guys? The gun I'm looking at is the 444 Ti ultra lite... The guy has a smith and it and is selling it... wonder why??? :dunno: :chuckle:
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline johnnyaustin44

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1124
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2014, 09:48:44 AM »
I have the m44 and gave had zero issues with it at all. Shoots great and cycles well. I'd get another.

Offline Blacklab

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 8135
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2014, 09:55:01 AM »
Not the 44 mag. But I had a 357 mag cia 2 1/2. With not many rounds maybe 20 the wheel fell out  :yike: :bash: Fixed it and sold it won't own another Taurus. My bro in-law has a 6in tracker 357 mag within about the same amount of rounds 20. The front site fell off. He fixed it and is looking into selling it. Life time warranty they need it. Both these happened first time out. Buyer beware  :twocents:
Hey! I'm not a complete idiot I have parts missing. Though sometimes I wonder.

If you want to make God laugh tell him your plans.

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2014, 10:02:47 AM »
That is completely unbelievable.... wow.
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline Hunt4ever

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 271
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2014, 10:08:11 AM »
ya I guess im blown away... ive owned the 6" raging bull and now I currently carry the snub 44 mag Taurus, my dad has the tracker, all my uncles own the snubbies and the long 44 mags and not one issue has ever come up with any of ours... Maybe we just are really lucky... or its just the ultra light part that is the issue?

Offline RatherBOutdoors

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: Gig Harbor
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2014, 11:17:11 AM »
I have the Taurus Raging Bull in .454 Casull with no issues.  A very accurate shooter.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2014, 12:24:24 PM »
I shoot a titanium .375 with a 6" barrel.  It's a great gun, would absolutely recommend it.

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2014, 12:39:38 PM »
Any model 444 owners out there???
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline Jason

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3562
  • Location: Kalama
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2014, 12:43:16 PM »
I have and shoot a 444 4" ultra light. Bought it for back packing.
I've put about 60rds of factory hornady 240gr XTPs and about 70rds of 240gr XTPs home loads.
Never had a problem other than the brass is a little tight ejecting from the cylinder after shooting my reloads but my buddies 329pd has the same issue with hot reloads.

I did replace the front sight with a custom fiber optic one than is taller, because my gun was shooting 1' high at 30yds with no more adjustment left in the rear sight.

Works great for what I bought it for, If i have the urge to target shoot or develop more loads then I just use my trusty old Blackhawk.

Offline 724wd

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2014, 03:00:56 AM »
shoot, I've got an old Rossi, which is supposed to be even worse than a taurus!  My gun (.357) is VERY accurate and i Love it!  if you can handle the gun to check for cylinder play and it seems tight, i wouldn't have ANY problem buying it!

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2014, 04:11:42 AM »
I had a buddy who had a .357 Taurus revolver. The gun would fire a few rounds and heat up and expand. The hammer wouldn't contact the next round in the cylinder  :yike: After some cool off time it would shoot again.

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2014, 08:18:34 AM »
I am going to see if the guy will let me shoot a few rounds out of it... if not, I will at least handle it. I honestly am not going to shoot this gun much... but still... its gotta be there when I need it... while playing i'll just shoot 44 sp. out of it... or light handloads... but I will be loading it with heavy casts for backpacking in bear country....
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for people to hunt with. by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:21:22 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by Humptulips
[Today at 01:13:50 PM]


Primer 157 vs 209 by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:30:27 AM]


Evergreen youth livestock show and sale by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:06:58 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by ThunderRolls
[Today at 10:14:52 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by elkaholic123
[Today at 08:39:45 AM]


Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed by Wood2Sawdust
[Today at 07:49:52 AM]


Upland Side by Side by OutHouse
[Today at 07:37:28 AM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:54:44 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:45:13 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by metlhead
[Yesterday at 07:43:57 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Yesterday at 06:45:11 PM]


Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 06:44:33 PM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 05:22:46 PM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 03:02:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:19:48 PM]


Dandy Bull by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 01:29:37 PM]


Tricer AD tripod by gee_unit360
[Yesterday at 12:40:45 PM]


How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:28:44 AM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 10:22:55 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal