Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Equipment & Gear
»
Guns and Ammo
»
Why not the Taurus? (44)
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Why not the Taurus? (44) (Read 10457 times)
Hornseeker
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3097
Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
on:
November 10, 2014, 09:15:42 AM »
I have held and cycled the action on the Taurus lightweight 44's... they fit my hand great. I am looking for and needing a packable, 4 inch 44 mag for backpacking and archery hunting. I like/love the 629 and the new 69... but they are in the neighboorhood of 3-5 hundred dollars more.
This gun will NOT be shot a lot... it will be packed on my hip belt and stuffed under the front seat... it'll get a few hundred rounds through it over the next 5 years... Is there anything to be scared of?
Just curious, cause armslist has one local here... its the Ti lite...
Logged
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"
Advertise Here
elkinrutdrivemenuts
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2285
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #1 on:
November 10, 2014, 09:18:20 AM »
I had the Taurus Raging bull 44. The barrel blew in half in my hands. Thats why not!
I got a brand new pistol as a replacement, and the cylinder play was so sloppy, I was afraid to even shoot it. Maybe I got 2 lemons, but I wont own another.
Logged
wildmanoutdoors
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2459
Location: Port Orchard
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #2 on:
November 10, 2014, 09:32:22 AM »
I had an M44 and the cylinder would lock up and or come out of timing. There servive was great, but at what cost.
Logged
Hornseeker
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3097
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #3 on:
November 10, 2014, 09:40:00 AM »
That sucks... I guess you get what you pay for?? Any positive feedback guys? The gun I'm looking at is the 444 Ti ultra lite... The guy has a smith and it and is selling it... wonder why???
Logged
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"
johnnyaustin44
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1124
Location: Arlington
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #4 on:
November 10, 2014, 09:48:44 AM »
I have the m44 and gave had zero issues with it at all. Shoots great and cycles well. I'd get another.
Logged
Blacklab
Site Sponsor
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8135
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #5 on:
November 10, 2014, 09:55:01 AM »
Not the 44 mag. But I had a 357 mag cia 2 1/2. With not many rounds maybe 20 the wheel fell out
Fixed it and sold it won't own another Taurus. My bro in-law has a 6in tracker 357 mag within about the same amount of rounds 20. The front site fell off. He fixed it and is looking into selling it. Life time warranty they need it. Both these happened first time out. Buyer beware
Logged
Hey! I'm not a complete idiot I have parts missing. Though sometimes I wonder.
If you want to make God laugh tell him your plans.
Hornseeker
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3097
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #6 on:
November 10, 2014, 10:02:47 AM »
That is completely unbelievable.... wow.
Logged
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"
Hunt4ever
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Scout
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #7 on:
November 10, 2014, 10:08:11 AM »
ya I guess im blown away... ive owned the 6" raging bull and now I currently carry the snub 44 mag Taurus, my dad has the tracker, all my uncles own the snubbies and the long 44 mags and not one issue has ever come up with any of ours... Maybe we just are really lucky... or its just the ultra light part that is the issue?
Logged
RatherBOutdoors
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 44
Location: Gig Harbor
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #8 on:
November 10, 2014, 11:17:11 AM »
I have the Taurus Raging Bull in .454 Casull with no issues. A very accurate shooter.
Logged
WAcoyotehunter
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4457
Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #9 on:
November 10, 2014, 12:24:24 PM »
I shoot a titanium .375 with a 6" barrel. It's a great gun, would absolutely recommend it.
Logged
Hornseeker
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3097
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #10 on:
November 10, 2014, 12:39:38 PM »
Any model 444 owners out there???
Logged
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"
Jason
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+4
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3562
Location: Kalama
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #11 on:
November 10, 2014, 12:43:16 PM »
I have and shoot a 444 4" ultra light. Bought it for back packing.
I've put about 60rds of factory hornady 240gr XTPs and about 70rds of 240gr XTPs home loads.
Never had a problem other than the brass is a little tight ejecting from the cylinder after shooting my reloads but my buddies 329pd has the same issue with hot reloads.
I did replace the front sight with a custom fiber optic one than is taller, because my gun was shooting 1' high at 30yds with no more adjustment left in the rear sight.
Works great for what I bought it for, If i have the urge to target shoot or develop more loads then I just use my trusty old Blackhawk.
Logged
724wd
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
+2
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3884
Location: Spokane
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #12 on:
November 11, 2014, 03:00:56 AM »
shoot, I've got an old Rossi, which is supposed to be even worse than a taurus! My gun (.357) is VERY accurate and i Love it! if you can handle the gun to check for cylinder play and it seems tight, i wouldn't have ANY problem buying it!
Logged
Bean Counter
Site Sponsor
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13624
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #13 on:
November 11, 2014, 04:11:42 AM »
I had a buddy who had a .357 Taurus revolver. The gun would fire a few rounds and heat up and expand. The hammer wouldn't contact the next round in the cylinder
After some cool off time it would shoot again.
Logged
Hornseeker
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3097
Re: Why not the Taurus? (44)
«
Reply #14 on:
November 11, 2014, 08:18:34 AM »
I am going to see if the guy will let me shoot a few rounds out of it... if not, I will at least handle it. I honestly am not going to shoot this gun much... but still... its gotta be there when I need it... while playing i'll just shoot 44 sp. out of it... or light handloads... but I will be loading it with heavy casts for backpacking in bear country....
Logged
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Equipment & Gear
»
Guns and Ammo
»
Why not the Taurus? (44)
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Looking for people to hunt with.
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Today
at 01:21:22 PM]
Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners
by
Humptulips
[
Today
at 01:13:50 PM]
Primer 157 vs 209
by
EnglishSetter
[
Today
at 11:30:27 AM]
Evergreen youth livestock show and sale
by
nwwanderer
[
Today
at 11:06:58 AM]
Selkirk bull moose.
by
ThunderRolls
[
Today
at 10:14:52 AM]
2025 Quality Chewuch Tag
by
elkaholic123
[
Today
at 08:39:45 AM]
Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed
by
Wood2Sawdust
[
Today
at 07:49:52 AM]
Upland Side by Side
by
OutHouse
[
Today
at 07:37:28 AM]
Tooth age on Quinault bull
by
nwwanderer
[
Today
at 06:54:44 AM]
Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation
by
JDArms1240
[
Yesterday
at 08:45:13 PM]
North Peninsula Salmon Fishing
by
metlhead
[
Yesterday
at 07:43:57 PM]
3 days for Kings
by
Stein
[
Yesterday
at 06:45:11 PM]
Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project
by
JDHasty
[
Yesterday
at 06:44:33 PM]
Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2?
by
WAcoueshunter
[
Yesterday
at 05:22:46 PM]
GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting
by
GeoSwan
[
Yesterday
at 03:02:21 PM]
2025 NWTF Jakes Day
by
wadu1
[
Yesterday
at 02:19:48 PM]
Dandy Bull
by
Buckhunter24
[
Yesterday
at 01:29:37 PM]
Tricer AD tripod
by
gee_unit360
[
Yesterday
at 12:40:45 PM]
How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's
by
jrebel
[
Yesterday
at 11:28:44 AM]
Ten Years, and still plugging along
by
JWBINX
[
Yesterday
at 10:22:55 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal