Equipment & Gear > Scopes and Optics

Scope for .300 Win Mag

Pages: << < (8/10) > >>

JDHasty:


--- Quote from: BLRman on February 05, 2016, 08:32:33 PM ---
--- Quote from: JDHasty on February 05, 2016, 08:14:19 PM ---
--- Quote from: BLRman on February 05, 2016, 07:58:18 PM ---Lap your rings, a little blue lock tite, and tighten to specs and you will be fine.  What kind of ranges are you wanting to shoot?  Can't go wrong with Zeiss, NF, Leupold, Sightron, or any other top shelf glass in my opinion.  Comes down to what features and specs you want.

--- End quote ---

Blue locktite betw the rings and scope?  That may be a good thing for me now that my can of Scotch Coat is all dried up and I can no longer find it for sale.  I had to send the Burris 3-9 Signature on my big game rifle back this year.  It is a relatively heavy scope in a very light 300 Wby McMillan stocked Mod 70 that has never been adjusted for POI in 30 years and once I attempted to tweek it slightly this year was all over the place.  I don't know that it will move when re mounted, but if blue locktite betw the rings and scope tube offers a near guarantee - why not?

Normally I don't even consider scopes moving because I only shoot one scoped big game rifle, my 1886 45/70 carbine and my mod 71 both have Lyman peeps that never move.  On Varmint rifles there is no significant recoil.   

--- End quote ---
Haha!  I read back through that again and must have missed it, but no I don't put lock tite between the scope and rings.  Although it could actually work now that I think about it :chuckle:

--- End quote ---

I put the Scotch Coat on "just because" and at that juncture I had just bought the rifle.  When I get it back I will remount it, hopefully permanently, like I did the first time.  That rifle never has changed zero, but it was always a half inch left and this year I decided, for whatever reason, to center the crosshairs up. It is a good for a half-inch every year when I shoot a few before big game season.  When I get it back, I will zero it an inch and a half high right above my aiming point and I suspect it would never need adjustment so long as Nosler keeps making 200 gr Partitions.   

rem700300:

I have a NXS 5.5-22x56 on my 300 Winchester magnum.Do I love the scope? Yes. But what I have found out is that it is way more scope than I really need.Its a lot of gun and scope to take to the top of the mountain every day.The last 2 years in Montana I've ended up taking my deer at 200 yards or less. I've also learned by just shooting my rifles more that most of my hunting situations just don't need that magnification.I hope to someday be able to use its full potential.Dont skimp on rings and bases.I used all Nightforce bases and rings.I ended up buying a Tikka in 270wsm before the Washington deer season this last year and put a 3-9x40 Leupold that I had laying around and shot my buck at 380 yards and didn't feel under scoped.Just my 2 cents.Im not saying don't buy one I've just learned that so far I have not needed it. Maybe someday.

yorketransport:


--- Quote from: slm9s on February 05, 2016, 03:39:53 PM ---If you're not familiar, do a little research on the Sightron SIII.  A few years ago, after owning my first couple Sightrons I sold my 6 or 7 Nightforces and replaced them with SIIIs.  IMO you get 97% of the performance for ~50% of the cost.  Excellent glass, excellent tracking, and a GREAT value.  I'm a big fan of the LRMOA reticle.   :twocents:

--- End quote ---
:yeah: The SIII is an excellent scope worth significantly more than they sell for. I have 3 of them and the glass is every bit as good as the NF NXS, VX-3 and Mk 4 scopes I have. The only issue I have with them is that the clicks on the scope don't have as much resistance as some of the NF and Leupold scopes I have. If you carry your rifle in a pack the turrets may rotate while it's in the pack.

CAMPMEAT:


--- Quote from: BLRman on February 05, 2016, 09:25:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: CAMPMEAT on February 05, 2016, 09:18:26 PM ---You don't need a $1000 + scope on your gun. Buy a Vortex Diamondback. That's all you need. I really don't understand why guys say you need these expensive scopes for a gun you're going to shoot a few times a year.

I'm putting a Vortex PST on my custom 6.5 Creedmoor and that was only $700.

--- End quote ---
  My Vortex Viper had a full on failure on me this year.

--- End quote ---


What happened to your scope ?

Karl Blanchard:


--- Quote from: CAMPMEAT on February 06, 2016, 07:17:02 AM ---
--- Quote from: BLRman on February 05, 2016, 09:25:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: CAMPMEAT on February 05, 2016, 09:18:26 PM ---You don't need a $1000 + scope on your gun. Buy a Vortex Diamondback. That's all you need. I really don't understand why guys say you need these expensive scopes for a gun you're going to shoot a few times a year.

I'm putting a Vortex PST on my custom 6.5 Creedmoor and that was only $700.

--- End quote ---
  My Vortex Viper had a full on failure on me this year.

--- End quote ---


What happened to your scope ?

--- End quote ---
the reticle came loose or something and would spend when I adjusted my power ring. I no longer had crosshairs I had an X  :chuckle: for me personally, hunting is a pass fail test there's no second chances so the vortex is getting the boot and I'm climbing up the ladder hopefully.

Pages: << < (8/10) > >>

Go to full version