Free: Contests & Raffles.
My definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future. Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates. While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.Lets stop the exaggerated bs. Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should. Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.
Quote from: idahohuntr on June 03, 2016, 12:46:12 PMMy definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future. Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates. While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.Lets stop the exaggerated bs. Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should. Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country. Perfect, so I don't believe there is anybody on this site that truly believes wolves will "end hunting" , however there is no doubt that wolves will result in shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions, reduced harvest numbers and reduce success rates.
And, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"? We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent.
Quote from: Curly on June 03, 2016, 01:25:24 PMAnd, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"? We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent. They are being managed, SSS!
A forty per cent reduction in opportunities for hunters is now " reasonable"? And sportsmen should just shut up?Quote from: idahohuntr on June 03, 2016, 12:46:12 PMMy definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future. Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates. While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.Lets stop the exaggerated bs. Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should. Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.
Wolf management in this state? Now thats wishful thinking.
Quote from: huntnphool on June 03, 2016, 01:32:04 PMQuote from: Curly on June 03, 2016, 01:25:24 PMAnd, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"? We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent. They are being managed, SSS!I get it, breaking the law is cool if it's not a 400" bull or a 190" buck... Wow
You feverishly run your yap about other poaching
Like always you've got lots of other threads to give your 2 cents on, congrats??