Big Game Hunting > Bow Hunting

bow tests thus far

<< < (9/13) > >>

Hoytstaffshooter83:
weight measurement meaning? the 32 weighs 3.9 and the 35 4.1

Hoytstaffshooter83:

--- Quote from: Jason on February 14, 2009, 06:48:03 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hoytstaffshooter83 on February 14, 2009, 05:42:21 PM --- I shot the reezen 6.5 today after we put the new dampner on it, good god it is the biggest POS I have ever shot.. the thing had so much hand shock it almost fell out of my hand.. I was blown away......

--- End quote ---

 LOL.. have you shot the Martin firecat yet?, that thing has some good hand shock to it.

--- End quote ---


I have that was one of the bows in the test, it also has plenty of hand shock and is loud, but no where near the shock of the reezen... martin has not impressed me at all, the only decent bow is the warthog, I shot about 30 arrows through my buddys, its very fast, but as with all bows to get that the cams are crazy, and the backwall is not that great.......

funkster:

--- Quote from: Hoytstaffshooter83 on February 14, 2009, 07:54:55 PM ---weight measurement meaning? the 32 weighs 3.9 and the 35 4.1

--- End quote ---

Yes, what it weighs. Thanks but I was not talking about the catalog weight. I was talking about a bow setup with sight,quiver and stabilizer!

Hoytstaffshooter83:
OK mine with everything weighs just over 6. and its the 35

funkster:
Hoyt,thanks! I currently shoot with a stabilizer and I am thinking of not using one next season to shave weight, can you give me some pro's and con's if that would be a good idea or not. I have always used some type of stabilizer, I think that is how my dad setup my first bow and I just always went with one.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version