300 WSM VS. 7mm Rem Mag

[Curly]

17 years ago I had a similar choice. I was debating whether to go with a 7mm Rem mag or 300 win mag. I ended up getting the 300 win mag.  I have no regrets. I think it was a good choice. Since that time I have added several more chamberings to the collection (264 wm, 7-08, 280 Rem, 250 Savage) but still have not gotten a rifle in 7mm mag.

Anyway, good luck in your decision. I think I would lean toward the wsm too.

[CaNINE]

In the right rifle, with the right load, both the 7RM and 300WSM are very accurate cartridges.  At one time, the 300WSM held the world record for 1,000 yard benchrest precision shooting (not sure if that is still the case).  I have a 300WSM that shoots 168 VLD's at 3100 all the way up to 210 VLD's at 2900.  The 7RM is also very versatile with the ability to run 140 grain up to 180 grain projectiles.  If I had to choose only one I would go with the 300WSM simply due to its inherent accuracy and heavier bullet capabilities.     

[Humptulips]

I have both. Used a 7MM in a Savage for years. I think I got it in "73 and loved it. Killed many deer and elk with it. Then a few years back I got a chance to buy  a 300 WSM in a Browning from a friend at a good price. I had handled the rifle and liked it but not as much as when I started hunting with it. 7MM stays home now. The 300 is lighter but kicks less. Lighter is a big thing with me. I would say the 7MM has a little more punch but the 300 kills everything just as dead.
Both are great calibers but I am going to give the edge to the 300 WSM.