Big Game Hunting > Wolves
New Wolf Numbers
X-Force:
I don’t see how there is all this negativity when we haven’t seen the report yet. Minimum populations are just that minimum. The actual population is probably substantially higher... But it’s not the job of biologists to give you assumed or possible populations.
The $400k wdfw is spending on a conflict manager could really pay dividends in wolf documentation and monitoring.
Ridgeratt:
I am surprised that they would recognize the Togo pack since it is that close to Canada. They used to be transient packs and didn't count. Looks like the Leadpoint pack is just east of Onion Creek.
wolfbait:
--- Quote from: X-Force on March 17, 2018, 08:14:32 AM ---I don’t see how there is all this negativity when we haven’t seen the report yet. Minimum populations are just that minimum. The actual population is probably substantially higher... But it’s not the job of biologists to give you assumed or possible populations.
The $400k wdfw is spending on a conflict manager could really pay dividends in wolf documentation and monitoring.
--- End quote ---
Biologist down play the impact on game herds, refuse to confirm wolf predation on livestock and have a lot of input on wolf recovery, much of the disinformation on wolves comes from biologists.
According to fitkin the lookout pack was the only pack in the Okanogan for several years, even though he knew of other packs in the Okanogan.
The $$$ payed to the "conflict manager" is a waste of money. The whole wolf introduction into WA is a waste of $, unless you work for WDFW or the fake environmentalists concerning wolves.
WAcoyotehunter:
--- Quote from: wolfbait on March 17, 2018, 02:28:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: X-Force on March 17, 2018, 08:14:32 AM ---I don’t see how there is all this negativity when we haven’t seen the report yet. Minimum populations are just that minimum. The actual population is probably substantially higher... But it’s not the job of biologists to give you assumed or possible populations.
The $400k wdfw is spending on a conflict manager could really pay dividends in wolf documentation and monitoring.
--- End quote ---
Biologist down play the impact on game herds, refuse to confirm wolf predation on livestock and have a lot of input on wolf recovery, much of the disinformation on wolves comes from biologists.
According to fitkin the lookout pack was the only pack in the Okanogan for several years, even though he knew of other packs in the Okanogan.
The $$$ payed to the "conflict manager" is a waste of money. The whole wolf introduction into WA is a waste of $, unless you work for WDFW or the fake environmentalists concerning wolves.
--- End quote ---
Once again, wolves were not introduced into WA.
bigmacc:
--- Quote from: WAcoyotehunter on March 17, 2018, 07:46:16 PM ---
--- Quote from: wolfbait on March 17, 2018, 02:28:37 PM ---
--- Quote from: X-Force on March 17, 2018, 08:14:32 AM ---I don’t see how there is all this negativity when we haven’t seen the report yet. Minimum populations are just that minimum. The actual population is probably substantially higher... But it’s not the job of biologists to give you assumed or possible populations.
The $400k wdfw is spending on a conflict manager could really pay dividends in wolf documentation and monitoring.
--- End quote ---
Biologist down play the impact on game herds, refuse to confirm wolf predation on livestock and have a lot of input on wolf recovery, much of the disinformation on wolves comes from biologists.
According to fitkin the lookout pack was the only pack in the Okanogan for several years, even though he knew of other packs in the Okanogan.
The $$$ payed to the "conflict manager" is a waste of money. The whole wolf introduction into WA is a waste of $, unless you work for WDFW or the fake environmentalists concerning wolves.
--- End quote ---
Once again, wolves were not introduced into WA.
--- End quote ---
With all do respect WAcoyotehunter, no one really knows for sure, but one thing that is for sure, they are here and are being well taken care of, something just isn't right......as always, my :twocents:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version