Equipment & Gear > Scopes and Optics

Rifle scope choices??

<< < (3/12) > >>

pickardjw:

--- Quote from: Mtnwalker on March 08, 2024, 08:45:12 AM ---Those guys are doing everbody a favor with that testing. They've already got scope mfg's reaching out to them to test products before release now, hopefully some other big names will be forced to step up their reliability as a result

--- End quote ---

Agreed, the Maven RS1.2 story is a good testament. I do think too many take is as gospel and don't test their own systems, but that seems to be changing. There are other variable within the system beyond just the scope being able to maintain its zero.

I know my system shifts based on having to rezero it a couple times but I haven't seen any major shifts, just an MOA or two. That's why I want to do some more controlled testing to see if it's the scope or rings.

I'll be considering the NF SHV 4-14x50 FFP or Trijicon Tenmile HX 3-18x44 FFP if I do need to replace it. Maybe the Maven RS1.2 if I can convince myself that 10x max power is enough. I need to practice a lot more to get comfortable shooting longer distances at lower power.

Crunchy:

--- Quote from: jjhunter on March 08, 2024, 08:25:52 AM ---I got to 100% NF.  I like the NX8….but still prefer the NXS with the MOAR reticle.  I wish you could get it in the 4-32x in F2….it that was the case, it would be the only scope I owned.

The standard, “old school” heavy reticle MOAR.

--- End quote ---

fairly certain they offer the 4-32 in F2

Karl Blanchard:

--- Quote from: pickardjw on March 08, 2024, 09:01:49 AM ---
--- Quote from: Mtnwalker on March 08, 2024, 08:45:12 AM ---Those guys are doing everbody a favor with that testing. They've already got scope mfg's reaching out to them to test products before release now, hopefully some other big names will be forced to step up their reliability as a result

--- End quote ---

Agreed, the Maven RS1.2 story is a good testament. I do think too many take is as gospel and don't test their own systems, but that seems to be changing. There are other variable within the system beyond just the scope being able to maintain its zero.

I know my system shifts based on having to rezero it a couple times but I haven't seen any major shifts, just an MOA or two. That's why I want to do some more controlled testing to see if it's the scope or rings.

I'll be considering the NF SHV 4-14x50 FFP or Trijicon Tenmile HX 3-18x44 FFP if I do need to replace it. Maybe the Maven RS1.2 if I can convince myself that 10x max power is enough. I need to practice a lot more to get comfortable shooting longer distances at lower power.

--- End quote ---
the new maven is quite literally trijicon 10 mile guts with a bit better reticle. My opinion on reticles is just learn the one you have and it's not really a big deal.

I don't think you'll have an issue with 10x personally.  My .223 trainer has a fixed 10x and there's no issue spanking plates out to 805 yards (farthest plate My range has). Too much magnification, especially in a SFP can definitely be a hindrance in hunting applications. Especially when hunting solo where spotting impacts is so important :twocents:

My vote is always NF first.

Sakko300wsm:

--- Quote from: Crunchy on March 08, 2024, 09:12:25 AM ---
--- Quote from: jjhunter on March 08, 2024, 08:25:52 AM ---I got to 100% NF.  I like the NX8….but still prefer the NXS with the MOAR reticle.  I wish you could get it in the 4-32x in F2….it that was the case, it would be the only scope I owned.

The standard, “old school” heavy reticle MOAR.

--- End quote ---



fairly certain they offer the 4-32 in F2

--- End quote ---


My NX8 I just got yesterday is a 4-32x50 with MOAR reticle in F2

Alchase:
I think all three would be very capable, for me it would come down to perceived clearness of glass, and which reticle I prefer. I have really gotten spoiled by my Firedots.
Can't see me going back to a non-illuminated scope for hunting, though I Might reconsider if the build was for a long range paper shooter.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version