Big Game Hunting > Wolves
Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
LDennis24:
https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2024/07/12/why-washingtons-wolf-count-is-under-scrutiny/
HUNTIN4SIX:
Always have been since the start. We have/had the most biased group of Bio's and decision makers ever known. I have personally sat at behind close doors Region 1. Disrtict 1 meetings and witnessed it. All the way back when the Bio's were concealing den site location from the law enforcement who were responding to calls. Most of that agency is one deceptive chit show. I saw 24 years of it. I've attended employee "regional meetings" in Region 5,6 and 1. They were always brain washing and heavy petting events for the upper management. The buzz word at every one of them was "constituents".
Total politics in play on this subject....
I remember before I was fired they claimed 206 wolves and 33 packs. Do the math at 4-6 viable pups per female and tell me their not snow balling the public. Their deception even worse on cats.... Ask the deer and elk bio out of colville why she has predator track tats up and down her arms.
jackelope:
Is it expected that they would know exactly how many wolves are in WA?
They always seem to say “at least”
jstone:
Stop believing all that they say
Feathernfurr:
I mean I read this as fish and wildlife saying the numbers are high, and the commission/private groups saying WDFW is lying and that they’re lower. So who are we mad at here, the commission and wolf groups, or the agency? I know you all know better but I feel like we see a lot of discourse here that doesn’t acknowledge the separation of the commission that controls the laws and regs from the agency that does the biology and enforcement, which regularly disagree with one another.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version