Big Game Hunting > Deer Hunting
Which situation would you prefer and why?
Angus:
I voted for 6 in 10 years, that's about what my current success rate is but they are a long ways from 160".
CarbonHunter:
6 - 160” buck in tens years would be an unbelievable feat to accomplish. And 1 elk feeds my family for a year so deer are just icing on the cake. If I weren’t an elk hunter I may think of it differently.
muleyslayer:
I am currently happy with deer that are old or 160” plus, but it’s definitely a progression. Currently the six 160” to 180” bucks in 10 years would make me happy. I’d rather focus on “filling the freezer” with elk and whitetail. There was definitely a time when any legal mule deer was the goal.
Boss .300 winmag:
Should have shot this one, because the one I got last year was tougher than boiled shoot owl.🤯
Plus I wouldn’t have had to pack it out.🤣
Doublelunger:
220 is a buck of many many lifetimes. No brainer for me.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version