| Big Game Hunting > Wolves |
| Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal |
| << < (2/7) > >> |
| HUNTIN4SIX:
Agree with the last two posts. After one of my cows got attacked by a wolf and 200+ elk ran through all my fences in the last year, I will never call WDFW again. Any problem with just get handled accordingly. Their chit show is costing us thousands..... |
| brokentrail:
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed. One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan. I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job. Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law. I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job. |
| nwwanderer:
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock. Major cluster |
| Humptulips:
--- Quote from: brokentrail on October 19, 2025, 11:06:32 AM ---I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed. One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan. I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job. Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law. I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job. --- End quote --- It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene. |
| brokentrail:
--- Quote from: Humptulips on October 19, 2025, 01:10:22 PM --- --- Quote from: brokentrail on October 19, 2025, 11:06:32 AM ---I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed. One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan. I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job. Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law. I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job. --- End quote --- It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene. --- End quote --- Yea, I don't doubt that at all, I just wish that wasn't the case. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |