| Big Game Hunting > Out Of State Hunting |
| Montana Cutting Deer Licenses |
| << < (2/12) > >> |
| bustedoldman:
Most residents always blame nonresidents for the issues whether it be low animal numbers, trespassing, trash, off roading, poaching. I see residents saying they are willing to pay higher tag costs just to eliminate nonresidents. Why is it so hard for game departments to cut antlerless tags (both res and nonres) when the declines start to happen? Or a number of other issues that seem easily resolved with common sense tactics? It's hard to feel sorry for the economic loss when it turns into this. |
| MADMAX:
One of the few places left with welcome hunters signs too bad |
| hughjorgan:
I’m sure they’ll just raise tag prices again to make up for lost license sales |
| Threewolves:
Strange, they would cut non res tags. Their system is built off the backs of non res hunters, according to Randy Newburg. If overcrowding is the issue, why don't they do like Washington does: make resident hunters choose between weapon type, gun, bow or muzzleloader, THEN come back and charge residents more money to hunt all three methods. Instead of making residents choose to hunt either the west or east side of the state, they can make they also make them choose north and south too. Sounds like an eerily familiar method to disperse hunters in an attempt to avoid overcrowding, yet it is also a money maker! Sent from my SM-A426U using Tapatalk Oh, non residents, too . |
| Pathfinder101:
--- Quote from: hughjorgan on December 05, 2025, 06:13:46 AM ---I’m sure they’ll just raise tag prices again to make up for lost license sales --- End quote --- :yeah: |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |