Equipment & Gear > Scopes and Optics

MOA or MRAD, & Why?

<< < (2/4) > >>

pickardjw:
I switched from MOA to MILS and have been liking it. Dialing 3.2 is harder to mess up than 14.25. And no one is shooting the difference in precision of 0.1 MIL adjustments vs 0.25 MOA adjustments so that isn't a factor.

I use wind brackets but don't use quick drop. Rifle is too fast for it and I'm getting a solution from my rangefinder anyway.

I was MIL curious but never fully grasped why others preferred it until I listened to this.

Antlershed:
The only “MRAD is easier” argument I’ve heard is that it’s easier to do calculations on the fly. I use a Sig 8k rangefinder that’s giving me my adjustments, so I’m not trying to solve complex math equations on the fly.  :chuckle: I’ve always shot MOA scopes, so that’s what I continue to use. It’s easy for me to see 4.86 MOA from the Sig and decide if I want to dial 4.75 or 5. 🤷🏻‍♂️

JakeLand:
Look into the leupold CDS scopes once they’re set and your turret is made it’s easy simple and accurate

TeacherMan:

--- Quote from: JakeLand on December 12, 2025, 05:31:46 PM ---Look into the leupold CDS scopes once they’re set and your turret is made it’s easy simple and accurate

--- End quote ---

I have, they are close but dont have the dial out distance I’m wanting.

EnglishSetter:

--- Quote from: TeacherMan on December 12, 2025, 08:44:20 PM ---
--- Quote from: JakeLand on December 12, 2025, 05:31:46 PM ---Look into the leupold CDS scopes once they’re set and your turret is made it’s easy simple and accurate

--- End quote ---

I have, they are close but dont have the dial out distance I’m wanting.

--- End quote ---

45 MOA isn't enough??? They have 1, 2 & 3 turn CDS dial available.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page