collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Selkirks?  (Read 8385 times)

Offline Timber

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 414
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2009, 08:45:52 PM »
This is a pic of a bull right before he was shot by my buddy. He was 43" wide. Looks to be about the same width as the bull posted.
Logged

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 39068
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2009, 12:06:46 AM »
I would say 40-44 ish, but better horns than the bull posted by timber....no offense, just an opinion on the pic of the first bull.....pass him, there are much better bulls...
Logged
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50686
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2009, 01:40:29 PM »
I'd also way in at 43ish. 
Logged

Offline GoldTip

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4588
  • Location: Spokane, WA
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2009, 04:22:37 PM »
He's a pretty good looking bull, but there are better bulls in that unit.
Logged
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
If I ageed with you, then we'd both be wrong.
You are never to old to learn something stupid.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50686
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2009, 04:24:33 PM »
By the way its pouring in the desert so I think your fire worries are a mute point
Logged

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 668
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Selkirks?
« Reply #20 on: August 16, 2009, 08:27:06 PM »
 :yeah: I'd listen to that guy. I don't know him but from what I've seen on here he knows his s___. By the way I was guessing 38"  before reading further, but I'm no moose guy.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by Carwash
[Today at 09:24:00 PM]
Discretion !!! by Carwash
[Today at 09:15:42 PM]
WA wolf population increases 17%. by fowl smacker
[Today at 08:20:26 PM]
Rokon by d_wilson
[Today at 07:56:43 PM]
2026 turkey season! by mboyle0828
[Today at 03:23:35 PM]
Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by hughjorgan
[Today at 02:56:08 PM]
Big game season proposals by hunter399
[Today at 02:23:13 PM]
Laser engraving service in western washington by Goshawk
[Today at 09:35:51 AM]
Solar Generator by CP
[Today at 08:04:30 AM]
You Bear Slayers by bowman
[Today at 07:24:11 AM]
Turkey Fan/beard Plaques by fire*guy
[Today at 07:13:53 AM]
Spring Idaho by bearpaw
[Today at 06:06:31 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal