Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access

WDFW seeking comment on proposed rules for public conduct on wildlife lands

<< < (5/11) > >>

billythekidrock:
Maybe I am wrong Bob. When I read, "department-owned or controlled public lands" I am worried about the word "controlled". The fact that F&W controls hunting, does that mean they can control the CF, which is managed by DNR?

Maybe I am over reacting?

bobcat:
No, I guarantee you the WDFW has no control over what happens on DNR lands, other than possibly those lands they lease from the DNR. That's probably what the word "controlled" is in there for...they do have some lands leased from the DNR for wildlife habitat and/or recreational purposes.

Dman:
 Any public lands within the State are subject to State regulation, including DNR and NF lands. As you know the State already set's the hunting season's for DNR/NF lands. 

bobcat:
This is not about hunting seasons. If you read the proposals, you'll see this:  "department-owned or controlled public lands, waters, or access areas."  From this it is obvious that none of these proposals are referring to National Forest lands, or any state lands (such as DNR) not owned or "controlled" (leased) by the WDFW. I just read through all the proposals and they all seem very reasonable to me. And again, these are only regulating the use of WDFW lands.

Ray:
To me the word controlled in that statement means that any land that will be regulated by the WDFW means they are in control of it; and that these regulations would all be the law according to that.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page