Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access
WDFW seeking comment on proposed rules for public conduct on wildlife lands
bobcat:
Somebody call a lawyer. :dunno:
boneaddict:
Thats probably who wrote this stuff. Write it so it can be interpretted any way they like.
Ray:
Let me put it in this perspective. If I can seemingly convince one or two other hunters here on my interpretations of the definitions and proposal then imagine what a lawyer\prosecutor wanting a big bonus for his next BMW could do to a judge or group of jurors who don't hunt.
boneaddict:
I've thought of that many times. In fact, when they first closed Robinson many years back, I was pissed because I used to chase Turkeys and snakes in there and now I had to wait until the snakes were fired up and the Turkey season was aobut over. I got over that, but the whole state shut down. WHATEVER.
Dman:
I have been involved with the drafting of policy in the past, wife also manages a law firm. By legal definition, "controlled" would include rights to which WDFW claims governance of including -hunting closures in the NF. If that is not the WDFW's intention, then they do need to clarify what lands are affected, because as you stated, the door has been left open with that regard.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version