collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Binoc Comparison  (Read 6942 times)

Offline oldschool

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 310
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2009, 04:26:49 PM »
 Thanks for all the input I'm like a kid in a candy store. :P

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2009, 10:54:30 PM »
HI I was wondering what warranty Zen Ray has on the 10x43 ED

From Zen Ray's sight.....................

The following products carry transferable limited lifetime warranty:

    * 2009 Model VISTA, MARINER, ZRS, and ZEN ED Binoculars
    * SEDONA Spotting Scope

Zen-Ray guarantees your product to be free of defects in materials and workmanship for the lifetime of the product. These warranties do not cover consumer caused damages such as misuse, abuse or repairs attempted by someone other than our authorized technicians.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Thefisherman83

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 814
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2009, 12:30:22 AM »
I got the 12x42 camo Monarch's in sept. for just under $300.  I believe they are still coming with a $50 mail in rebate(I lost mine  :bash:)
Hunting and Fishing are not matters of life or death... THEY ARE WAY MORE IMPORTANT!!!

"Nothing Makes a fish bigger than almost being caught."

Poles are for skiing, Rods are for fishing!
Team Loomis!

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2009, 04:39:29 AM »
for the wet side 8x42 leupold works great.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5076
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2009, 09:26:47 PM »
I would get anything less than 10 power, and at least a 40+mm objective.

Offline royalbull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 516
  • Location: ENUMCLAW
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2009, 09:25:08 AM »
I would put the $350 in the safe and keep saving

Offline HUNT

  • Site Sponsor
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1137
  • Location: Packard
Re: Binoc Comparison
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2009, 09:52:31 AM »
 :yeah:

You'll never regret it!
Rack'd Up Outdoors

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Great article on trapping and pets by redi
[Yesterday at 09:13:05 PM]


WSTA Winter Renezvous fur buying by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 07:55:26 PM]


1993 ford f250 OBS Dana 60 swap by Night goat
[Yesterday at 07:04:42 PM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by millerwheeler
[Yesterday at 06:27:08 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by SEWA509
[Yesterday at 04:08:05 PM]


Razor Clamming this weekend by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 01:49:51 PM]


Smith for a model 94 restoration by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 08:05:38 AM]


Cage Trapping Bobcats by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 07:22:07 AM]


Tree Stand Hunting Rocky Mountain Elk - The Book by Kingofthemountain83
[February 28, 2026, 09:53:03 PM]


European skull personalized wall state mounts by WapitiTalk1
[February 28, 2026, 09:16:29 PM]


Shoot or No Shot 2026, Episode #1 by blackveltbowhunter
[February 28, 2026, 08:59:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal