Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access

Gregoire Taking Wildlife Plate Revenue?

<< < (11/11)

Special T:
Big Tex  "I know the area you are talking about and that is actually owned by King County DNR, not the State DNR. They are two different agencies..."
Does this make a difference in your mind? if so how?

bigtex:

--- Quote from: Special T on February 17, 2010, 04:26:16 PM ---Big Tex  "I know the area you are talking about and that is actually owned by King County DNR, not the State DNR. They are two different agencies..."
Does this make a difference in your mind? if so how?

--- End quote ---

Well one is funded by the state, the other is not
WDFW is potentially going to be moving under the state agency, not the county agency
A lot of King Co DNR's program is on noxious weed control, not so much state DNR with the exception of spartina

Special T:
I guess I'm just easily frustrated because often times one Gov agency plays you against the other and then tell you their hands are tied when one of them has a hand in your problem.  I personally don't have a problem with trying to controll noxious weeds and such, i actually think its a good idea, I just hate how they use their different tools to TAX us a little extra under some ruse..

buckman:
MAKE YOUR VOTE COUNT;  :twocents:

mulehunter:
Every Year Increase People population, Make thing HARDEST to Deal with what they believe on their SIDE and what they THINK as IDIOT!! How can 6 Million alone in Washington to AGREE on ONE THING! NEVER WILL MAKE ANYONE HAPPY!

ITS GETTING WORST!

Mulehunter  :(

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version