Equipment & Gear > Guns and Ammo
Ruger hawkeye??
<< < (2/3) > >>
high country:
I'd pay $100 for a stock, and if you own a ruger pre hawkeye you prolly bought a stock......or throw your puppy in the microwave because the factory stock pisses you off so bad.
actionshooter:
 I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:
high country:

--- Quote from: actionshooter on January 20, 2008, 08:09:44 AM --- I was talking about the wood stocks on the M77 being nicer. Not the Zytel canoe paddles the call a synthetic stocks.  :chuckle:

--- End quote ---

so was I ;). the m77 wood stock is easily the worst ever, right behind the birch savage. could they have made it any chunkier? I think not. the hawkeye is way more slim and efficient then the m77......they throw in a better finish and trigger for the cost of the stock.....good deal.
mossback91:
I was looking at the all weather model.
mossback91:
Have any of you shot one? or do any of you own one?
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page

Go to full version