Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access
Oh No!
Aneoakleaf:
If that happens, this could be the push that moves us to Oregon :yike:
Ridgerunner:
of course its driven by $$$$$. They desperately need more of it. Programming that would be a nightmare I would think.
high country:
I guess I don't understand. if they gave 200 choices the guys the get drawn still only get the hunts that are available. if you put in for the shed and have 14 points and put a cow as a choice on your draw...and get a cow, that is your tough luck. I think it would get the big strappers out of the draw pool in a hurry.
am I seeing this wrong?
SkookumHntr:
yes your seeing it wrong. limiting your choices to say two hunts means you have to apply for the hunt you really want so your name isnt in the pot for say 8 other hunts, thus increasing draw odds.
bobcat:
Limiting choices wouldn't always increase odds. It would increase for some permits, and decrease odds for other permits. There would still be the same number of permits and the same number of applicants, so overall the odds would stay the same. That's the way I see it anyway.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version